BACKGROUND: This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES) to measure fear of falling in cognitively impaired older people. Icon-FES uses pictures as visual cues to prompt responses. METHODS: A total of 50 community-dwelling older people with moderate cognitive impairment were assessed on Icon-FES, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and various physical and cognitive measures. RESULTS: Overall structure and measurement properties of Icon-FES, as evaluated with item response theory, were good. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97). Distribution was near normal, indicating absence of floor and ceiling effects. Icon-FES construct validity was supported by its relation with Falls Efficacy Scale-International (r = .68, p < .001) and its ability to discriminate between groups relating to fall risk factors (gender, balance, falls). Scores were not affected by different levels of cognitive functioning, as assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination and Trail Making Test. CONCLUSIONS: Icon-FES is the first measure of fear of falling that compensates for reduced abstract abilities by using pictures to match the verbal descriptions. This study supports its feasibility, reliability, and validity to assess fear of falling in people with moderate cognitive impairment or dementia living in the community. Compared with Falls Efficacy Scale-International, Icon-FES was better at identifying participants with higher fall risk and did not show a floor effect likely due to a greater range of physically challenging activities.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES) to measure fear of falling in cognitively impaired older people. Icon-FES uses pictures as visual cues to prompt responses. METHODS: A total of 50 community-dwelling older people with moderate cognitive impairment were assessed on Icon-FES, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and various physical and cognitive measures. RESULTS: Overall structure and measurement properties of Icon-FES, as evaluated with item response theory, were good. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97). Distribution was near normal, indicating absence of floor and ceiling effects. Icon-FES construct validity was supported by its relation with Falls Efficacy Scale-International (r = .68, p < .001) and its ability to discriminate between groups relating to fall risk factors (gender, balance, falls). Scores were not affected by different levels of cognitive functioning, as assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination and Trail Making Test. CONCLUSIONS: Icon-FES is the first measure of fear of falling that compensates for reduced abstract abilities by using pictures to match the verbal descriptions. This study supports its feasibility, reliability, and validity to assess fear of falling in people with moderate cognitive impairment or dementia living in the community. Compared with Falls Efficacy Scale-International, Icon-FES was better at identifying participants with higher fall risk and did not show a floor effect likely due to a greater range of physically challenging activities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alzheimer’s disease; Dementia; Falls; Fear of falling; Geriatric assessment
Authors: Michael Schwenk; Klaus Hauer; Tania Zieschang; Stefan Englert; Jane Mohler; Bijan Najafi Journal: Gerontology Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Jacqueline C T Close; Jacqueline Wesson; Catherine Sherrington; Keith D Hill; Sue Kurrle; Stephen R Lord; Henry Brodaty; Kirsten Howard; Laura N Gitlin; Sandra D O'Rourke; Lindy Clemson Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Susan W Hunter; Alison Divine; Humberto Omana; Walter Wittich; Keith D Hill; Andrew M Johnson; Jeffrey D Holmes Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: M Racey; M Markle-Reid; D Fitzpatrick-Lewis; M U Ali; H Gagne; S Hunter; J Ploeg; R Sztramko; L Harrison; R Lewis; M Jovkovic; D Sherifali Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Pazit Levinger; Anita M Y Goh; Jeremy Dunn; Josephine Katite; Ritu Paudel; Adrian Onofrio; Frances Batchelor; Maya G Panisset; Keith D Hill Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-03-22