Literature DB >> 23681895

[How safe is sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy? A multicentre analysis of 388,404 endoscopies and analysis of data from prospective registries of complications managed by members of the Working Group of Leading Hospital Gastroenterologists (ALGK)].

A Behrens1, J Labenz, A Schuler, W Schröder, M Rünzi, R-U Steinmann, C-R de Mas, A Kreuzmayr, K Barth, M J Bahr, E Burmester, J F Erckenbrecht, T Frieling, F L Dumoulin, B Pfaffenbach, W Schepp, A Schneider, G Kleber, M Meiborg, S Böhm, C Dietrich, C F Dietrich, U Gottschalk, C Ell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal endoscopies are increasingly being carried out with sedation. All of the drugs used for sedation are associated with a certain risk of complications. Data currently available on sedation-associated morbidity and mortality rates are limited and in most cases have substantial methodological limitations. The aim of this study was to record severe sedation-associated complications in a large number of gastrointestinal endoscopies.
METHODS: Data on severe sedation-associated complications were collected on a multicentre basis from prospectively recorded registries of complications in the participating hospitals (median documentation period 27 months, range 9 - 129 months).
RESULTS: Data for 388,404 endoscopies from 15 departments were included in the study. Severe sedation-associated complications occurred in 57 patients (0.01 %). Forty-one percent of the complications and 50 % of all complications with a fatal outcome (10/20 patients) occurred during emergency endoscopies. In addition, it was found that 95 % of the complications and 100 % of all fatal complications affected patients in ASA class ≥ 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Including nearly 400,000 endoscopies, this study represents the largest prospective, multicenter record of the complications of sedation worldwide. The analysis shows that sedation is carried out safely in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The morbidity and mortality rates are much lower than previously reported in the literature in similar groups of patients. Risk factors for the occurrence of serious complications include emergency examinations and patients in ASA class ≥ 3. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681895     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  5 in total

1.  Unsedated versus sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: a questionnaire investigation in Wuhan, central China.

Authors:  Hong-Ling Wang; Fen Ye; Wen-Fei Liao; Bing Xia; Guo-Rong Zheng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats.

Authors:  Hendrikus Jm Pullens; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-16

Review 3.  Sedation in the Endoscopy Suite.

Authors:  Katherine B Hagan; Selvi Thirumurthi; Raju Gottumukkala; John Vargo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

4.  Room for Quality Improvement in Endoscopist-Directed Sedation: Results from the First Nationwide Survey in Korea.

Authors:  Chang Kyun Lee; Seok Ho Dong; Eun Sun Kim; Sung-Hoon Moon; Hong Jun Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Young Chul Yoo; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang Kil Lee; Jong Jin Hyun
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.519

5.  [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer-Indicators for quality in diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  Jens Hoeppner; Patrick Sven Plum; Heinz Buhr; Ines Gockel; Dietmar Lorenz; Michael Ghadimi; Christiane Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.