Literature DB >> 23681793

Value-based healthcare in Lynch syndrome.

Simone D Hennink1, Nandy Hofland, Jessica P Gopie, Corinne van der Kaa, Kimberley de Koning, Maartje Nielsen, Carli Tops, Hans Morreau, Wouter H de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Alexandra M J Langers, James C Hardwick, Katja N Gaarenstroom, Rob A Tollenaar, Roeland A Veenendaal, Aad Tibben, Juul Wijnen, Magdalena van Heck, Christi van Asperen, Anne J Roukema, Daan W Hommes, Frederik J Hes, Hans F A Vasen.   

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS), one of the most frequent forms of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC), is caused by a defect in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Carriers of MMR defects have a strongly increased risk of developing CRC and endometrial cancer. Over the last few years, value-based healthcare has been introduced as an approach to the cost-effective delivery of measurable patient value over complete cycles of care. This requires all involved stakeholders to formulate and validate 'patient value' for Lynch syndrome, as well as to identify targets and associated costs. The aim of this study was to develop a value-based care model for Lynch syndrome that can determine patient value and associated costs, and to design a coordinated care pathway from existing guidelines. All specialists in our hospital involved in the management of LS patients evaluated the care delivered to these patients at their department and formulated outcome measures relevant to patient value. Patients were then invited to complete a questionnaire that assessed the importance of these measures on a scale of 1-10. Six high-value outcomes were identified: (1) prevention of cancer or detection of early stage cancer (2) rapid results from MMR gene mutation testing (3) rapid investigation of the colon and uterus (4) no/little pain during colonoscopy and gynaecologic examination/biopsy (5) the offer of psychological help and (6) registration with the Dutch Lynch syndrome registry. A total of 38 (59 %) out of 62 patients completed the questionnaire. The relevance of all outcomes was confirmed by the patients and mean scores varied from 7.2 to 9.9. Patients underscored the relevance of both proper patient education and the efficiency of surveillance during their care cycle. Value-based care delivery for Lynch syndrome includes the implementation of six parameters related to prevention and early detection of cancer, a short cycle time and registration to ensure continuation of care. Estimated costs are <euro> 3320 for the first cycle of care (<euro> 3550 including gynaecologic surveillance) and approximately 720 per subsequent annual cycle (<euro> 950 including gynaecologic surveillance).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681793     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9655-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  12 in total

1.  Impact of colonoscopic screening in male and female Lynch syndrome carriers with an MSH2 mutation.

Authors:  S Stuckless; J S Green; M Morgenstern; C Kennedy; R C Green; M O Woods; W Fitzgerald; J Cox; P S Parfrey
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Ingrid van Kessel; Mieke G Kriege; Carli M J Tops; Juul Th Wijnen; Hans F A Vasen; Conny A van der Meer; Iris I H van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Surveillance for hereditary cancer: does the benefit outweigh the psychological burden?--A systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica P Gopie; Hans F A Vasen; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Screening reduces colorectal cancer rate in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; J P Mecklin; P Sistonen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  One to 2-year surveillance intervals reduce risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Hans F A Vasen; Mohamed Abdirahman; Richard Brohet; Alexandra M J Langers; Jan H Kleibeuker; Mariette van Kouwen; Jan Jacob Koornstra; Henk Boot; Annemieke Cats; Evelien Dekker; Silvia Sanduleanu; Jan-Werner Poley; James C H Hardwick; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong; T Gie Tan; Maarten A J M Jacobs; Faig Lall A Mohamed; Sijbrand Y de Boer; Paul C van de Meeberg; Marie-Louise Verhulst; Jan M Salemans; Nico van Bentem; B Dik Westerveld; Juda Vecht; Fokko M Nagengast
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Surveillance for endometrial cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Ralf Bützow; Arto Leminen; Pentti Lehtovirta; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Heikki J Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Efficacy of annual colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Engel; Nils Rahner; Karsten Schulmann; Elke Holinski-Feder; Timm O Goecke; Hans K Schackert; Matthias Kloor; Verena Steinke; Holger Vogelsang; Gabriela Möslein; Heike Görgens; Stefan Dechant; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Josef Rüschoff; Nicolaus Friedrichs; Reinhard Büttner; Markus Loeffler; Peter Propping; Wolff Schmiegel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P M Lynch; S J Lanspa; C L Snyder; J F Lynch; C R Boland
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts.

Authors:  Hans F A Vasen; Ignacio Blanco; Katja Aktan-Collan; Jessica P Gopie; Angel Alonso; Stefan Aretz; Inge Bernstein; Lucio Bertario; John Burn; Gabriel Capella; Chrystelle Colas; Christoph Engel; Ian M Frayling; Maurizio Genuardi; Karl Heinimann; Frederik J Hes; Shirley V Hodgson; John A Karagiannis; Fiona Lalloo; Annika Lindblom; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Pal Møller; Torben Myrhoj; Fokko M Nagengast; Yann Parc; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Julian R Sampson; Astrid Stormorken; Rolf H Sijmons; Sabine Tejpar; Huw J W Thomas; Nils Rahner; Juul T Wijnen; Heikki Juhani Järvinen; Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.