Literature DB >> 23681499

Sacrococcygeal sinus angle: as a new anatomic landmark for the posterior approach of presacral lesions.

Metin Kaplan1, Sait Ozturk, Hakan Cakin, Bekir Akgun, Mehmet Ruhi Onur, Fatih Serhat Erol.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have discussed the importance of sacrococcygeal sinus angle (SSA), which is a new anatomical landmark in the surgery of presacral lesions. Because of its anatomical structure, the sacrum limits the surgical exposure like a compact barrier for the posterior surgical approach. The main aim of this paper is to explain the anatomical description and clinical importance of SSA in the surgery of presacral lesions.
METHODS: Three groups were designated, consisting of ten patients in each group, as early childhood (group 1), late childhood (group 2) and adulthood (group 3). Patients were selected randomly. The degree of SSA measurement was performed between the line tangent to the anterior margin of the first sacral vertebra and the line from the promontorium to the tip of the coccyx. The measurement of SSA was performed on patients' lumbosacral magnetic resonance images. When the SSA forms a triangle via a parallel line starting from the inferior tip of the sacrum and running parallel to the ground, the area of the triangle also covers the field of view of the presacral region. In addition, the sacral region needed to be resected for maximum exposure is also within this area.
RESULTS: The mean SSA was measured to be 53.9 ± 11.4° in group 1, 77.8 ± 11.2° in group 2 and 74.5 ± 12.5° in group 3. Intergroup comparisons revealed a significant difference between group 1 and the other two groups statistically. It was found that the SSA was 20° less in group 1 as compared to the other age groups (p = 0.0005). The area of a triangle is calculated using the sine area formula, and according to this formula the area of a triangle increases when the degree of the angle increases, thus comprising larger part of the sacrum. This condition requires more and wide sacral resection to obtain maximum exposure in the presacral zone.
CONCLUSIONS: We have observed that the SSA is significantly smaller during early childhood compared with the other age groups. This feature provides an anatomical superiority in this age group for the posterior approach in the surgical treatment of presacral masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681499      PMCID: PMC3906469          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2830-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric presacral masses.

Authors:  Murat Kocaoglu; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Endoscopic perineal approach to the presacral space: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Dorothée H Nieuwenhuis; Sergio J Bardaro; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  The posterior approach for low retrorectal tumors in adults.

Authors:  Nicolas Buchs; Sophia Taylor; Bruno Roche
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  [Retrorectal tumors: an assessment of the abdominal approach].

Authors:  P Guillem; O Ernst; M Herjean; J P Triboulet
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  2001-03

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of primary sacral tumors: complications associated with sacrectomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Cüneyt Hoscoskun; Priscilla Brastianos; Dündar Sabah
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Abdominosacral approach for retrorectal tumors.

Authors:  S A Localio; K Eng; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  [Presacral tumors. Analysis of 20 surgically treated patients].

Authors:  Enrique Canelles; José V Roig; Miriam Cantos; Juan García Armengol; Erica Barreiro; Francisco L Villalba; María Dolores Ruiz; Vicente Pla
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 1.653

9.  Endoscopic resection of a presacral schwannoma. Case report.

Authors:  Chih-Chuan Yang; Hung-Chang Chen; Chien-Min Chen
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-07

10.  Sacral window for the surgery of L5 neurofibroma: a technical note.

Authors:  Metin Kaplan; Mehmet Faik Ozveren
Journal:  Turk Neurosurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.