BACKGROUND: Liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) by Fibroscan is now widely used to assess liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Liver steatosis is a common lesion in chronic hepatitis C as in other chronic liver diseases, but its influence on LSE remains unclear. We aimed to precisely determine the influence of steatosis on LSE by using quantitative and precise morphometric measurements of liver histology. METHODS: 650 patients with chronic hepatitis C, liver biopsy, and LSE were included. Liver specimens were evaluated by optical analysis (Metavir F and A, steatosis grading) and by computerized morphometry to determine the area (%, reflecting quantity) and fractal dimension (FD, reflecting architecture) of liver fibrosis and steatosis. RESULTS: The relationships between LSE and liver histology were better described using morphometry. LSE median was independently linked to fibrosis (area or FD), steatosis (area or FD), activity (serum AST), and IQR/LSE median. Steatosis area ≥4.0 % induced a 50 % increase in LSE result in patients with fibrosis area <9 %. In patients with IQR/LSE median ≤0.30, the rate of F0/1 patients misclassified as F ≥ 2 by Fibroscan was, respectively for steatosis area <4.0 and ≥4.0 %: 12.6 vs 32.4 % (p = 0.003). Steatosis level did not influence LSE median when fibrosis area was ≥9 %, and consequently did not increase the rate of F ≤ 3 patients misclassified as cirrhotic. CONCLUSION: A precise evaluation of liver histology by computerized morphometry shows that liver stiffness measured by Fibroscan is linked to liver fibrosis, activity, and also steatosis. High level of steatosis induces misevaluation of liver fibrosis by Fibroscan.
BACKGROUND:Liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) by Fibroscan is now widely used to assess liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Liver steatosis is a common lesion in chronic hepatitis C as in other chronic liver diseases, but its influence on LSE remains unclear. We aimed to precisely determine the influence of steatosis on LSE by using quantitative and precise morphometric measurements of liver histology. METHODS: 650 patients with chronic hepatitis C, liver biopsy, and LSE were included. Liver specimens were evaluated by optical analysis (Metavir F and A, steatosis grading) and by computerized morphometry to determine the area (%, reflecting quantity) and fractal dimension (FD, reflecting architecture) of liver fibrosis and steatosis. RESULTS: The relationships between LSE and liver histology were better described using morphometry. LSE median was independently linked to fibrosis (area or FD), steatosis (area or FD), activity (serum AST), and IQR/LSE median. Steatosis area ≥4.0 % induced a 50 % increase in LSE result in patients with fibrosis area <9 %. In patients with IQR/LSE median ≤0.30, the rate of F0/1 patients misclassified as F ≥ 2 by Fibroscan was, respectively for steatosis area <4.0 and ≥4.0 %: 12.6 vs 32.4 % (p = 0.003). Steatosis level did not influence LSE median when fibrosis area was ≥9 %, and consequently did not increase the rate of F ≤ 3 patients misclassified as cirrhotic. CONCLUSION: A precise evaluation of liver histology by computerized morphometry shows that liver stiffness measured by Fibroscan is linked to liver fibrosis, activity, and also steatosis. High level of steatosis induces misevaluation of liver fibrosis by Fibroscan.
Authors: M Sasso; I Tengher-Barna; M Ziol; V Miette; C Fournier; L Sandrin; R Poupon; A-C Cardoso; P Marcellin; C Douvin; V de Ledinghen; J-C Trinchet; M Beaugrand Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Gunda Millonig; Stefanie Friedrich; Stefanie Adolf; Hamidreza Fonouni; Mohammad Golriz; Arianeb Mehrabi; Peter Stiefel; Gudrun Pöschl; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Karl Seitz; Sebastian Mueller Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Frédéric Moal; Daniel Chappard; Jianhua Wang; Eric Vuillemin; Sophie Michalak-Provost; Marie Christine Rousselet; Frédéric Oberti; Paul Calès Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Justin Stebbing; Lavanta Farouk; George Panos; Mike Anderson; Long R Jiao; Sundhiya Mandalia; Mark Bower; Brian Gazzard; Mark Nelson Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Anneloes E Bohte; Annikki de Niet; Louis Jansen; Shandra Bipat; Aart J Nederveen; Joanne Verheij; Valeska Terpstra; Ralph Sinkus; Karin M J van Nieuwkerk; Rob J de Knegt; Bert C Baak; Peter L M Jansen; Henk W Reesink; Jaap Stoker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Magdalena Ydreborg; Johan Westin; Karolina Rembeck; Magnus Lindh; Hans Norrgren; Anna Holmberg; Rune Wejstål; Gunnar Norkrans; Kristina Cardell; Ola Weiland; Martin Lagging Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rosa M S Sigrist; Joy Liau; Ahmed El Kaffas; Maria Cristina Chammas; Juergen K Willmann Journal: Theranostics Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 11.556