BACKGROUND: A large number of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients are treated with imatinib mesylate outside of clinical trials, which may not be representative of common clinical practice. The age of CML patients enrolled within controlled clinical studies is lower with respect to patients included in population-based registries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To describe the safety and tolerability of imatinib in very elderly CML patients in chronic phase, 211 chronic-phase CML patients aged >75 years were retrospectively analyzed using data collected from 31 institutions in Italy. RESULTS: The median age at imatinib start was 78.6 years [interquartile range (IR) 76.3-81.4], median time from diagnosis to imatinib start was 1.2 months (IR 0.5-3.7). The starting dose of imatinib was 400 mg/day in 144 patients (68.2 %), >400 mg/day in 4 patients (2.0 %), and <400 mg/day in 63 patients (29.8 %); overall, 94 patients (44.5 %) needed a dose reduction and 27 (12.7 %) discontinued imatinib for toxicity. Grade 3-4 hematologic and extrahematologic toxicities were observed in 40 (18.9 %) and 45 (21.3 %) patients, respectively. After a median observation of 29.8 months (IR 13.0-55.6), 203/211 patients had at least 6 months of observation on imatinib or discontinued before and were evaluable for response and outcome; of them, 183 patients (90.2 %) achieved a complete hematologic response (CHR). Among these 183 patients in CHR, 14 refused any other karyotypic or molecular evaluation, 24 achieved CHR only, and 145 (71.4 %) achieved a cytogenetic response (CyR) of any grade, which was complete (CCyR) in 129 (63.5 %). Among the 129 patients with CCyR, 95 (46.7 %) achieved a major molecular response (MMolR). By multivariate regression analysis, late chronic phase (p = 0.001) and grade 3-4 extrahematologic toxicity (p = 0.007) maintained a negative independent prognostic impact for CCyR, while late chronic phase (p = 0.026), grade 3-4 extrahematologic toxicity (p = 0.007), and lower initial dose of imatinib (p = 0.044) maintained a negative independent prognostic impact for MMolR. The 2-year and 4-year overall survival were 92.6 % (95 % CI 88.7-96.5) and 78.0 % (95 % CI 71.2-84.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this large cohort of patients show that no upper age limit should be applied for the administration of imatinib to patients with chronic-phase CML; the very elderly, including those with concomitant severe diseases, should be offered this treatment. The role of a reduced starting dose of imatinib warrants further studies.
BACKGROUND: A large number of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients are treated with imatinib mesylate outside of clinical trials, which may not be representative of common clinical practice. The age of CMLpatients enrolled within controlled clinical studies is lower with respect to patients included in population-based registries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To describe the safety and tolerability of imatinib in very elderly CMLpatients in chronic phase, 211 chronic-phase CMLpatients aged >75 years were retrospectively analyzed using data collected from 31 institutions in Italy. RESULTS: The median age at imatinib start was 78.6 years [interquartile range (IR) 76.3-81.4], median time from diagnosis to imatinib start was 1.2 months (IR 0.5-3.7). The starting dose of imatinib was 400 mg/day in 144 patients (68.2 %), >400 mg/day in 4 patients (2.0 %), and <400 mg/day in 63 patients (29.8 %); overall, 94 patients (44.5 %) needed a dose reduction and 27 (12.7 %) discontinued imatinib for toxicity. Grade 3-4 hematologic and extrahematologic toxicities were observed in 40 (18.9 %) and 45 (21.3 %) patients, respectively. After a median observation of 29.8 months (IR 13.0-55.6), 203/211 patients had at least 6 months of observation on imatinib or discontinued before and were evaluable for response and outcome; of them, 183 patients (90.2 %) achieved a complete hematologic response (CHR). Among these 183 patients in CHR, 14 refused any other karyotypic or molecular evaluation, 24 achieved CHR only, and 145 (71.4 %) achieved a cytogenetic response (CyR) of any grade, which was complete (CCyR) in 129 (63.5 %). Among the 129 patients with CCyR, 95 (46.7 %) achieved a major molecular response (MMolR). By multivariate regression analysis, late chronic phase (p = 0.001) and grade 3-4 extrahematologic toxicity (p = 0.007) maintained a negative independent prognostic impact for CCyR, while late chronic phase (p = 0.026), grade 3-4 extrahematologic toxicity (p = 0.007), and lower initial dose of imatinib (p = 0.044) maintained a negative independent prognostic impact for MMolR. The 2-year and 4-year overall survival were 92.6 % (95 % CI 88.7-96.5) and 78.0 % (95 % CI 71.2-84.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this large cohort of patients show that no upper age limit should be applied for the administration of imatinib to patients with chronic-phase CML; the very elderly, including those with concomitant severe diseases, should be offered this treatment. The role of a reduced starting dose of imatinib warrants further studies.
Authors: F Bonifazi; A De Vivo; G Rosti; M Tiribelli; D Russo; E Trabacchi; M Fiacchini; E Montefusco; M Baccarani Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: B J Druker; M Talpaz; D J Resta; B Peng; E Buchdunger; J M Ford; N B Lydon; H Kantarjian; R Capdeville; S Ohno-Jones; C L Sawyers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M C Müller; P Erben; G Saglio; E Gottardi; C G Nyvold; T Schenk; T Ernst; S Lauber; J Kruth; R Hehlmann; A Hochhaus Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Timothy Hughes; Michael Deininger; Andreas Hochhaus; Susan Branford; Jerald Radich; Jaspal Kaeda; Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Nicholas C P Cross; Brian J Druker; Jean Gabert; David Grimwade; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Jeffrey H Lipton; Janina Longtine; Giovanni Martinelli; Giuseppe Saglio; Simona Soverini; Wendy Stock; John M Goldman Journal: Blood Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Kadabur Nagendrappa Lokesh; Jitendra Kumar Pehalajani; Dassappa Loknatha; Linu Abraham Jacob; M C Suresh Babu; A H Rudresha; Lakkavalli Krishnappa Rajeev; S C Smitha; Khandare Pravin Ashok; D S Madhumathi Journal: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 0.900
Authors: Stuart L Goldberg; Jorge E Cortes; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Rüdiger Hehlmann; H Jean Khoury; Mauricette Michallet; Ron L Paquette; Bengt Simonsson; Teresa Zyczynski; Aimee Foreman; Elisabetta Abruzzese; David Andorsky; Aart Beeker; Pascale Cony-Makhoul; Richard Hansen; Elza Lomaia; Eduardo Olavarria; Michael J Mauro Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Mohammad Mohammadi; Yang Cao; Ingrid Glimelius; Matteo Bottai; Sandra Eloranta; Karin E Smedby Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 4.430