| Literature DB >> 23680857 |
Silvia Tenorio-Salgado1, Raunel Tinoco, Rafael Vazquez-Duhalt, Jesus Caballero-Mellado, Ernesto Perez-Rueda.
Abstract
It has been documented that bacteria from the Burkholderia genera produce different kinds of compounds that inhibit plant pathogens, however in Burkholderia tropica, an endophytic diazotrophic and phosphate-solubilizing bacterium isolated from a wide diversity of plants, the capacity to produce antifungal compounds has not been evaluated. In order to expand our knowledge about Burkholderia tropica as a potential biological control agent, we analyzed 15 different strains of this bacterium to evaluate their capacities to inhibit the growth of four phytopathogenic fungi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum and Sclerotium rolffsi. Diverse analytical techniques, including plant root protection and dish plate growth assays and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy showed that the fungal growth inhibition was intimately associated with the volatile compounds produced by B. tropica and, in particular, two bacterial strains (MTo293 and TTe203) exhibited the highest radial mycelial growth inhibition. Morphological changes associated with these compounds, such as disruption of fungal hyphae, were identified by using photomicrographic analysis. By using gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy technique, 18 volatile compounds involved in the growth inhibition mechanism were identified, including α-pinene and limonene. In addition, we found a high proportion of bacterial strains that produced siderophores during growth with different carbon sources, such as alanine and glutamic acid; however, their roles in the antagonism mechanism remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Burkholderia tropica; antagonism; phytopathogenic fungi; volatile compound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23680857 PMCID: PMC3728194 DOI: 10.4161/bioe.23808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269

Figure 1. Antagonism assay of B. tropica strains against F. culmorum in PDA medium. The panels show the fungus without antagonist bacterial strains (A) or with four bacterial strains, MOc725, MXo436, MTo431 and MTo293 (B) (n = 3).
Table 1. Antagonistic effect of B. tropica against four fungi
| Strain | % Growth Inhibition of: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MXo436 | 74 ± 6.0 | 49 ± 1.5 | 41 ± 3.0 | 32 ± 3.4 |
| MXo437 | 74 ± 0.9 | 49 ± 4.0 | 41 ± 4.4 | 34 ± 5.0 |
| MCu812 | 74 ± 4.0 | 30 ± 7.0 | 47 ± 3.6 | 35 ± 7.0 |
| CBN724 | 67 ± 4.0 | 49 ± 3.0 | 47 ± 2.0 | 29 ± 4.6 |
| CBN516 | 67 ± 6.0 | 47 ± 5.0 | 44 ± 3.7 | 34 ± 5.1 |
| MOc3412 | 59 ± 5.0 | 35 ± 2.3 | 44 ± 1.0 | 29 ± 5.0 |
| MOc3413 | 69 ± 4.0 | 49 ± 6.0 | 47 ± 1.5 | 32 ± 4.0 |
| MOc235 | 69 ± 7.0 | 49 ± 4.2 | 44 ± 2.3 | 32 ± 4.0 |
| MOc725 | 72 ± 2.0 | 28 ± 7.1 | 47 ± 3.0 | 28 ± 5.8 |
| MTo16 | 62 ± 7.0 | 44 ± 2.0 | 56 ± 4.8 | 31 ± 5.0 |
| MTo293 | 72 ± 6.0 | 40 ± 6.0 | 65 ± 4.0 | 36 ± 3.0 |
| MTo431 | 69 ± 5.0 | 44 ± 4.0 | 41 ± 4.0 | 22 ± 5.0 |
| TTe203 | 74 ± 4.0 | 41 ± 2.1 | 49 ± 3.7 | 36 ± 0.9 |
| TTe219 | 64 ± 3.5 | 35 ± 0.9 | 44 ± 2.0 | 34 ± 1.0 |
| MMi786 | 72 ± 9.0 | 26 ± 4.5 | 44 ± 8.0 | 6 ± 0.5 |
| ** | 67 ± 7.0 | 63 ± 2.0 | 56 ± 5.1 | 11 ± 0.8 |
| ***CCE421 | 49 ± 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| *Fungus with no | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Values represent the percentage of growth inhibition of fungi, where zero indicates no inhibition. n = 3. ± represents standard deviations. *, the negative control was each fungus in the absence of the bacterial strain. B. cepacia and Burkholderia sp CCE421 were also included as controls.
Table 2. Effects of volatile compounds on fungal radial growth
| Growth inhibition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain | ||||
| MTo293 | 11 ± 1.5 | 32 ± 3.7 | 86 ± 4.5 | 71 ± 3.9 |
| MTo431 | 14 ± 1.5 | 19 ± 2.1 | 83 ± 1.3 | 63 ± 4.6 |
| MOc725 | 14 ± 1.1 | 41 ± 3.4 | 59 ± 2.3 | 74 ± 2.0 |
| CBN516 | 11 ± 0.5 | 38 ± 1.7 | 57 ± 0.9 | 28 ± 1.7 |
| TTe203 | 22 ± 3.7 | 54 ± 3.4 | 66 ± 2.0 | 86 ± 3.2 |
| * | 2 ± 0.1 | 5 ± 0.6 | 10 ± 0.7 | 9 ± 0.8 |
| ** | 16 ± 1.7 | 45 ± 0.5 | 42 ± 1.0 | 30 ± 1.5 |
| Fungus with not bacteria* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Negative controls, ** Positive control.

Figure 2. Growth inhibition of (A)S. rolffsi, (B)C. gloesporioides, (C)F. oxysporum and (D)F. culmorum by volatile compounds.

Figure 3. Antagonistic effect of strain MTo431 over the fungus F. oxyxporum when cocultivated with maize plant in Fahraeus nutritive solution. Bacterial strains inhibited the fungus growth and resulted in maize plant protection. Control experiments were performed by inoculating plants with only the fungus without bacteria.

Figure 4. Morphological changes in phytopathogenic fungi by diffusible and volatile compounds produced by B. tropica strain MTo431. (A)F. culmorum without bacteria. (B) Effects of the volatile compounds on morphology of the fungus F. culmorum. (C)F. oxysporum without strain MTo431. (D)F. oxysporum in the presence of MTo431. The black arrows indicate hyphal swelling and red arrows denote protoplasm aggregation. The scale bar represents 1 mm.
Table 3. Volatile compounds detected in B. tropica MTo431 strain. n = 3
| Number | Compound | Number | Compound |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acetic acid | 10 | Methylcyclohexane |
| 2 | Methyl hexadecanoate | 11 | Nonane |
| 3 | Dimethyl disulfide | 12 | Ethylbenzene |
| 4 | Isobutylether | 13 | p-Xylene |
| 5 | Toluene | 14 | Ethyl valerate |
| 6 | Tetrachloroethyene | 15 | Ocimene |
| 7 | 5-Cyano-1,2,3-thiadiazole | 16 | α-Pinene |
| 8 | Tricosene | 17 | D-Limonene |
| 9 | 3-Methoxybutyl-1-eno | 18 | L-Fenchona |