Literature DB >> 23680831

En bloc vertebral column derotation provides spinal derotation but no additional effect on thoracic rib hump correction as compared with no derotation in adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis with total pedicle screw instrumentation.

Mikko Mattila1, Tuomas Jalanko, Ilkka Helenius.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A comparative review of 2 cohorts with prospective data collection.
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and radiographical parameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing surgery, using total pedicle screw instrumentation with and without en bloc vertebral column derotation (DVR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: All pedicle screw instrumentations with or without DVR are an effective surgical method for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction. However, there are limited data comparing pedicle screw instrumentation alone with pedicle screws with DVR on clinical and radiographical outcomes.
METHODS: We followed 72 consecutive children and adolescents (14 males, mean age at surgery: 14.7 [range, 9.0-18.0] years; 6 juveniles, 66 adolescents) operated for a structural thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke 1-4, or 6) using all pedicle screw construct in a prospective manner for a minimum of 2 years. Of them, 24 had pedicle screw instrumentation with apical monoaxial screws without derotation (N-DVR) and 48 with en bloc DVR.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean (SD) main thoracic curve was 56° ± 9° and 57° ± 11° and was corrected to 16° ± 6° in both groups at 2-year follow-up (not significant). Thoracic rib hump averaged 12.3° ± 3.6° versus 14.2° ± 5.0° (P = 0.075) preoperatively and 7.2° ± 3.8° versus 8.3° ± 3.7° at 2-year follow-up in the N-DVR and in the DVR both groups, respectively (P = 0.30). Correction of spinal rotation in the main thoracic curve as assessed by the Upsani score was significantly better in the DVR group than in the N-DVR group at 6 months (P = 0.038) and 2-year follow-up (P = 0.039). Thoracic kyphosis reduced from a mean of 23° ± 18° to 20° ± 9° in the N-DVR group but remained unchanged in the DVR group (P = 0.11 between groups at 2-year follow-up).
CONCLUSION: En bloc DVR has a significant effect on radiographical spinal column derotation and may help prevent flattening of thoracic kyphosis, but this derotation is not reflected by better thoracic rib hump correction at 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23680831     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829a6d37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Preoperative pregabalin has no effect on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformities: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Linda Helenius; Antti Puhakka; Tuula Manner; Olli Pajulo; Ilkka Helenius
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Radiographic, clinical, and patients' assessment of segmental direct vertebral body derotation versus simple rod derotation in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective, comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Xiangyu Tang; Jing Zhao; Yonggang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Bilateral reconstructive costoplasty for razorback deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Eyal Behrbalk; Ofir Uri; Jonathan A Clamp; Marcus Rickert; Bronek Maximilian Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Vertebral coplanar alignment technique: a surgical option for correction of adult thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Shouyu He; Hongda Bao; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Feng Zhu; Hengcai Zhou; Xu Sun; Bin Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Preservation of Spine Motion in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Innovative Apical Fusion Technique: A 2-Year Follow-Up Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pooria Hosseini; Allen Carl; Michael Grevitt; Colin Nnadi; Martin Repko; Dennis G Crandall; Ufuk Aydinli; Ľuboš Rehák; Martin Zabka; Steven Seme; Behrooz A Akbarnia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

7.  Correction manoeuvres in the surgical treatment of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Alpaslan Senkoylu; Mehmet Cetinkaya
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

8.  The impact of direct vertebral rotation (DVR) on radiographic outcome in surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wiktor Urbanski; Michal J Wolanczyk; Wojciech Jurasz; Miroslaw Kulej; Piotr Morasiewicz; Szymon Lukasz Dragan; Marek Sasiadek; Szymon Feliks Dragan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Choice of Rods in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Clinical Implications of Biomechanical Properties? - A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Benny Dahl; Martin Gehrchen
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-06-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.