OBJECTIVES: Using a mixed-method, participatory research approach, we investigated factors related to community health worker (CHW) community advocacy that affect social determinants of health. METHODS: We used cross-sectional survey data for 371 CHWs to assess demographics, training, work environment, and leadership qualities on civic, political, and organizational advocacy. We present advocacy stories to further articulate CHW activities. The data reported are from the recently completed National Community Health Workers Advocacy Study. RESULTS: CHWs are involved in advocacy that is community-focused, although advocacy differs by intrinsic leadership, experience, training, and work environment. We propose a framework to conceptualize, support, and evaluate CHW advocacy and the iterative processes they engage in. These processes create opportunities for community voice and action to affect social and structural conditions that are known to have wide-ranging health effects on communities. CONCLUSIONS: The framework presented may have utility for CHWs, their training programs, and their employers as well as funders and policymakers aiming to promote health equity.
OBJECTIVES: Using a mixed-method, participatory research approach, we investigated factors related to community health worker (CHW) community advocacy that affect social determinants of health. METHODS: We used cross-sectional survey data for 371 CHWs to assess demographics, training, work environment, and leadership qualities on civic, political, and organizational advocacy. We present advocacy stories to further articulate CHW activities. The data reported are from the recently completed National Community Health Workers Advocacy Study. RESULTS: CHWs are involved in advocacy that is community-focused, although advocacy differs by intrinsic leadership, experience, training, and work environment. We propose a framework to conceptualize, support, and evaluate CHW advocacy and the iterative processes they engage in. These processes create opportunities for community voice and action to affect social and structural conditions that are known to have wide-ranging health effects on communities. CONCLUSIONS: The framework presented may have utility for CHWs, their training programs, and their employers as well as funders and policymakers aiming to promote health equity.
Authors: Marie Wolff; Staci Young; Barbra Beck; Cheryl A Maurana; Margaret Murphy; James Holifield; Charles Aitch Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Mar-Apr
Authors: Lisa K Staten; Karen Y Gregory-Mercado; James Ranger-Moore; Julie C Will; Anna R Giuliano; Earl S Ford; James Marshall Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jennifer B Hunter; Jill Guernsey de Zapien; Mary Papenfuss; Maria Lourdes Fernandez; Joel Meister; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2004-08
Authors: Kimlin Tam Ashing; Aria M Miller; Eudora Mitchell; Virginia Martin; Kommah McDowell; Rhonda Santifer; June Smith; Shirley Brown; Camille Ragin; Agatha Carrington Journal: Breast Cancer Manag Date: 2014
Authors: A Feinberg; P M Lopez; K Wyka; N Islam; L Seidl; E Drackett; A Mata; J Pinzon; M R Baker; J Lopez; C Trinh-Shevrin; D Shelley; Z Bailey; K A Maybank; L E Thorpe Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Maia Ingram; Kevin Doubleday; Melanie L Bell; Abby Lohr; Lucy Murrieta; Maria Velasco; John Blackburn; Samantha Sabo; Jill Guernsey de Zapien; Scott C Carvajal Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David A Stupplebeen; Tetine L Sentell; Catherine M Pirkle; Bryan Juan; Alexis T Barnett-Sherrill; Joseph W Humphry; Sheryl R Yoshimura; Jasmin Kiernan; Claudia P Hartz; L Brooke Keliikoa Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2019-06