Literature DB >> 23678865

Systematic review of the effects of telecare provided for a person with social care needs on outcomes for their informal carers.

Anna Davies1, Lorna Rixon, Stanton Newman.   

Abstract

Telecare devices have been put forward as a potentially effective intervention to benefit the well-being and functioning of informal carers of people with social care needs, and to reduce the negative effects of providing care to a family member or friend. Much of the evidence used to support this view is qualitative, and therefore does not provide good-quality evidence to answer questions about its effect on carer outcomes. This review aimed to document and evaluate the quantitative evidence base for the effect of telecare interventions on outcomes for informal carers. A systematic search was conducted between October 2009 and January 2010 to identify peer-reviewed and 'grey' intervention evaluations, using electronic databases and expert/interested party recommendations. Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria and a reliable screening process were applied to select papers for inclusion in the review, and a checklist was used to assess risk of bias for each evaluation. Of 1071 identified evaluations, seven fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, two were peer-reviewed, and the remainder were unpublished or internal reports. Included evaluations were heterogeneous; they had investigated diverse technologies and outcomes, using varied evaluation designs and measures. All included evaluations were rated as being of weak methodological quality, indicating risk of bias within the evidence base. The evidence tentatively indicated that telecare exerts a positive effect on carer stress and strain, but there is no evidence to indicate benefits on burden or quality of life. The evidence is conflicting about the effect of telecare on the amount of time carers spend on their caring duties, and on relationships between the carer, cared-for person and other family members. Additional good-quality evaluations are required to establish the effects of telecare on informal carer outcomes.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted-living; burden; informal carers; remote monitoring; telecare; well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23678865     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  9 in total

1.  Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.

Authors:  Rebecca Gathercole; Rosie Bradley; Emma Harper; Lucy Davies; Lynn Pank; Natalie Lam; Anna Davies; Emma Talbot; Emma Hooper; Rachel Winson; Bethany Scutt; Victoria Ordonez Montano; Samantha Nunn; Grace Lavelle; Matthew Lariviere; Shashivadan Hirani; Stefano Brini; Andrew Bateman; Peter Bentham; Alistair Burns; Barbara Dunk; Kirsty Forsyth; Chris Fox; Catherine Henderson; Martin Knapp; Iracema Leroi; Stanton Newman; John O'Brien; Fiona Poland; John Woolham; Richard Gray; Robert Howard
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The impact of assistive technology on burden and psychological well-being in informal caregivers of people with dementia (ATTILA Study).

Authors:  Anna Davies; Stefano Brini; Shashivadan Hirani; Rebecca Gathercole; Kirsty Forsyth; Catherine Henderson; Rosie Bradley; Lucy Davies; Barbara Dunk; Emma Harper; Natalie Lam; Lynn Pank; Iracema Leroi; John Woolham; Chris Fox; John O'Brien; Andrew Bateman; Fiona Poland; Pete Bentham; Alistar Burns; Richard Gray; Martin Knapp; Emma Talbot; Emma Hooper; Rachel Winson; Bethany Scutt; Victoria Ordonez; Samantha Nunn; Grace Lavelle; Robert Howard; Stanton Newman
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2020-10-07

3.  The everyday use of assistive technology by people with dementia and their family carers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Grant Gibson; Claire Dickinson; Katie Brittain; Louise Robinson
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  The possibilities of day surgery system development within the health policy in Slovakia.

Authors:  Vincent Šoltés; Beáta Gavurová
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2014-12-28

5.  Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Catherine Henderson; Martin Knapp; José-Luis Fernández; Jennifer Beecham; Shashivadan P Hirani; Michelle Beynon; Martin Cartwright; Lorna Rixon; Helen Doll; Peter Bower; Adam Steventon; Anne Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; James Barlow; Martin Bardsley; Stanton P Newman
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 6.  Effectiveness of Digital Technologies to Support Nursing Care: Results of a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kai Huter; Tobias Krick; Dominik Domhoff; Kathrin Seibert; Karin Wolf-Ostermann; Heinz Rothgang
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-09

7.  "It's no good but at least I've always got it round my neck": A postphenomenological analysis of reassurance in assistive technology use by older people.

Authors:  Jennifer Lynch; Gemma Hughes; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Joseph Wherton; Christine A'Court
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Informal Caregivers' Perceptions of Self-Efficacy and Subjective Well-Being When Using Telecare in the Home Environment: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Simona Hvalič-Touzery; Kaja Smole-Orehek; Vesna Dolničar
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23

9.  Acceptability Among Community Healthcare Nurses of Intelligent Wireless Sensor-system Technology for the Rapid Detection of Health Issues in Home-dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Christine Cohen; Thomas Kampel; Henk Verloo
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2017-04-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.