AIM: We hypothesised that patients treated for breast cancer would benefit from targeted therapeutic action delivered by general practitioners on the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team based in primary care. METHODS: Patients scheduled for follow-up visits at a hospital surgical clinic were invited to complete a self-administered care needs assessment and be interviewed by a breast care nurse. Members of the multidisciplinary team discussed the audio-recorded interviews within 2 weeks. The team made recommendations for each patient, which were presented to the general practitioner as a suggested 'care plan'. Health status information was collected via the Short Form 36 and Anxiety and Depression data via the Hospital anxiety and Depression Scale at recruitment and 3 months later. RESULTS: Among the 74 women who were invited to participate, 21 were recruited over a 6-month period (28%), 19 of whom completed the study (90%). The mean age was 55 years (range 38-61 years) and the mean time in follow-up was 23 months (range 16-38 months). The team identified a median of three problems per patient (range 2-7) and made an average of two recommendations per patient for referral to an allied health professional (range 0-5). At 3 months, 17 women had attended their general practitioner, 11 of whom felt their condition had improved as a result of the intervention. There was no significant change in Short Form 36 or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care-based multidisciplinary review of treated breast cancer patients is feasible and, for most, results in benefit. However, only a minority of eligible patients participated in this pilot study and the logistics of organising the reviews warrants careful consideration.
AIM: We hypothesised that patients treated for breast cancer would benefit from targeted therapeutic action delivered by general practitioners on the recommendations of a multidisciplinary team based in primary care. METHODS:Patients scheduled for follow-up visits at a hospital surgical clinic were invited to complete a self-administered care needs assessment and be interviewed by a breast care nurse. Members of the multidisciplinary team discussed the audio-recorded interviews within 2 weeks. The team made recommendations for each patient, which were presented to the general practitioner as a suggested 'care plan'. Health status information was collected via the Short Form 36 and Anxiety and Depression data via the Hospital anxiety and Depression Scale at recruitment and 3 months later. RESULTS: Among the 74 women who were invited to participate, 21 were recruited over a 6-month period (28%), 19 of whom completed the study (90%). The mean age was 55 years (range 38-61 years) and the mean time in follow-up was 23 months (range 16-38 months). The team identified a median of three problems per patient (range 2-7) and made an average of two recommendations per patient for referral to an allied health professional (range 0-5). At 3 months, 17 women had attended their general practitioner, 11 of whom felt their condition had improved as a result of the intervention. There was no significant change in Short Form 36 or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care-based multidisciplinary review of treated breast cancerpatients is feasible and, for most, results in benefit. However, only a minority of eligible patients participated in this pilot study and the logistics of organising the reviews warrants careful consideration.
Authors: Sanneke Schepman; Johan Hansen; Iris D de Putter; Ronald S Batenburg; Dinny H de Bakker Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 5.120
Authors: Jennifer R Tomasone; Melissa C Brouwers; Marija Vukmirovic; Eva Grunfeld; Mary Ann O'Brien; Robin Urquhart; Melanie Walker; Fiona Webster; Margaret Fitch Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2016-09-06