Literature DB >> 23678153

Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: results through 2 years of the GO-FORWARD study extension.

Edward C Keystone1, Mark C Genovese, Stephen Hall, Pedro C Miranda, Sang-Cheol Bae, William Palmer, Zhong Wu, Stephen Xu, Elizabeth C Hsia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the longterm efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy.
METHODS: We randomized 444 RA patients with inadequate response to MTX (3:3:2:2) to placebo + MTX (Group 1), golimumab 100 mg + placebo (Group 2), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 3), or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 4). Subcutaneous golimumab/placebo was injected every 4 weeks. Patients could escape early (Group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, Group 2 added MTX, Group 3 increased golimumab to 100 mg, Group 4 continued 100 mg) based on Week 16 swollen and tender joint counts. From Week 24, Group 1 patients received golimumab 50 mg + MTX. After the Week 52 database lock, patients in the longterm extension received golimumab 50-100 mg ± MTX. Coprimary endpoints [Week 14 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, Week 24 Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] and Week 52 findings have been published; 2-year findings (observed data by randomized group, no imputation) are presented.
RESULTS: Of 444 randomized patients, 392 continued from Week 52 (Group 1: n = 116, Group 2: n = 116, Group 3: n = 84, Group 4: n = 76). Clinical improvement was maintained through Week 104; ~75% and 72% of patients randomized to golimumab 50 mg + MTX and 100 mg + MTX achieved ACR20 response, respectively. The majority [88% (105/120)] of golimumab + MTX-treated patients with Week 24 HAQ-DI improvement ≥ 0.25 maintained improved physical function through Week 104. Group 1 patients with delayed golimumab treatment exhibited more Week 104 radiographic progression (mean change score = 1.15) than golimumab + MTX-randomized patients (0.52). Incidences of serious infections were 2.24, 4.77, 5.78/100 patient-years of followup for golimumab 50 mg + MTX, 100 mg + placebo, and 100 mg + MTX, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Clinical improvement was maintained and no new safety signals were identified with 2 years of golimumab + MTX. Golimumab efficacy and safety, including serious infections, will continue to be monitored through 5 years (Clinical Trial No. NCT00264550).

Entities:  

Keywords:  EFFICACY; LONGTERM; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SAFETY; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ANTAGONIST

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23678153     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  16 in total

Review 1.  Patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Orbai; Clifton O Bingham
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Biological drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the subcutaneous route: interpreting efficacy data to assess statistical equivalence.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Valeria Fadda; Dario Maratea; Sabrina Trippoli; Roberta Gatto; Mauro De Rosa; Claudio Marinai
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Quantitative tracking of inflammatory activity at the peak and trough plasma levels of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, via in vivo 18 F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Sanchita Raychaudhuri; Christine Abria; Zachary T Harmany; Charles M Smith; Smriti Kundu-Raychaudhuri; Siba P Raychaudhuri; Abhijit J Chaudhari
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 4.  Biologic monotherapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jacqueline Detert; Pascal Klaus
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor: analysis of malignancies across the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Eun Bong Lee; Irina V Kaplan; Kenneth Kwok; Jamie Geier; Birgitta Benda; Koshika Soma; Lisy Wang; Richard Riese
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Benefit-risk assessment of golimumab in the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Daniela Pugliese; Carla Felice; Rosario Landi; Alfredo Papa; Luisa Guidi; Alessandro Armuzzi
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2016-02-03

7.  Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor-methotrexate combination therapy versus triple therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Roy Fleischmann; Vanita Tongbram; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Derek H Tang; James Chung; David Collier; Shilpa Urs; Kerigo Ndirangu; George Wells; Janet Pope
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2017-01-03

8.  The Efficacy and Safety of Golimumab as Third- or Fourth-Line Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients with Refractory Crohn's Disease: A Case Series.

Authors:  Linda Russi; Michael Scharl; Gerhard Rogler; Luc Biedermann
Journal:  Inflamm Intest Dis       Date:  2017-10-19

Review 9.  Benefit and Risk of Tofacitinib in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on Herpes Zoster.

Authors:  Kunihiro Yamaoka
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.228

10.  Golimumab 3-year safety update: an analysis of pooled data from the long-term extensions of randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Jonathan Kay; Roy Fleischmann; Edward Keystone; Elizabeth C Hsia; Benjamin Hsu; Michael Mack; Neil Goldstein; Jürgen Braun; Arthur Kavanaugh
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.