Literature DB >> 23678034

Comparative analysis of oncological outcomes and quality of life after robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and lateral neck node metastases.

Jandee Lee1, In Soon Kwon, Eun Hee Bae, Woong Youn Chung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Robotic total thyroidectomy (TT) with modified radical neck dissection (MRND) using a gasless transaxillary approach has been reported safe and effective in patients with N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), with notable cosmetic benefits when compared with conventional open TT. We have compared oncological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in PTC patients undergoing robotic TT and MRND and those undergoing conventional open procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2010 and July 2011, 128 patients with PTC and lateral neck node metastases underwent TT with MRND, including 62 who underwent robotic and 66 who underwent open TT. We compared oncologic outcomes and safety as well as functional outcomes such as postoperative subjective voice and swallowing difficulties. We also evaluated neck pain, sensory changes, and cosmetic satisfaction after surgery using various QoL symptom scales. Neck and shoulder disability was assessed using arm abduction tests (AAT) and questions from the neck dissection impairment index (NDII).
RESULTS: Although the mean operating time was significantly longer in the robotic (mean, 271.8 ± 50.2 min) than in the open group (mean, 208.9 ± 56.3 min) (P < .0001), postoperative complication rates and oncologic outcomes, including the results of radioactive iodine scans and postoperative serum Tg concentrations, did not differ significantly. Subjective voice outcomes and postoperative AAT and neck dissection impairment index were also similar, but postoperative swallowing difficulties (P = .0041) and sensory changes (P < .0001) were significantly more frequent in the open than in the robotic group. In particular, mean cosmetic satisfaction score was significantly higher in the robotic than in the open group (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic TT with MRND yielded similar oncologic outcomes and safety as conventional open procedures, with similar recovery of neck and shoulder disability. However, the robot technique resulted in better QoL outcomes, including better cosmetic results and reductions in neck sensory changes and swallowing discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23678034     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-1583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Robotic Thyroidectomy with Open Thyroidectomy for Graves' Disease.

Authors:  Hyungju Kwon; Jin Wook Yi; Ra-Yeong Song; Young Jun Chai; Su-jin Kim; June Young Choi; Kyu Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Retroauricular endoscopic and robotic versus conventional neck dissection for oral cancer.

Authors:  Renan Bezerra Lira; Thiago Celestino Chulam; Genival Barbosa de Carvalho; Willem Hans Schreuder; Yoon Woo Koh; Eun Chang Choi; Luiz Paulo Kowalski
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-05-04

3.  A prospective 1-year comparative study of transaxillary total thyroidectomy regarding functional outcomes: Is it really promising?

Authors:  Doh Young Lee; Saehee Lim; Sung Hoon Kang; Kyoung Ho Oh; Jae-Gu Cho; Seung-Kuk Baek; Jeong-Soo Woo; Soon-Young Kwon; Kwang-Yoon Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  "Scarless" (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET) with ipsilateral levels II, III, and IV dissection via breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Haichao Yan; Yong Wang; Ping Wang; Qiuping Xie; Qunzi Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Gasless, transaxillary robotic neck dissection: the technique and evidence.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Min Jhi Kim; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-10

Review 6.  Safe implementation of retroauricular robotic and endoscopic neck surgery in South America.

Authors:  Renan Bezerra Lira; Thiago Celestino Chulam; Luiz Paulo Kowalski
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 7.  Gasless trans-axillary robotic thyroidectomy: the technique and evidence.

Authors:  Hassan A Alzahrani; Khuzema Mohsin; Daniah Bu Ali; Fadi Murad; Emad Kandil
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 8.  Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Hua Pan; Hong Zhou; Xiao-Xu Zhao; Hui Ding; Li Wei; Li Qin; Yun-Long Pan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transaxillary robotic modified radical neck dissection: a 5-year assessment of operative and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Min Jhi Kim; Jandee Lee; Seul Gi Lee; Jung Bum Choi; Tae Hyung Kim; Eun Jeong Ban; Cho Rok Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Young Suk Jo; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic thyroidectomy for cancer in the US: patterns of use and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Paul Speicher; John Pura; Michaela A Dinan; Shelby D Reed; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.