Literature DB >> 23677357

Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.

Jean-Noel A Argenson1, Guillaume Blanc, Jean-Manuel Aubaniac, Sebastien Parratte.   

Abstract

We previously evaluated the three to ten-year results of 160 consecutive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties that had been performed by two surgeons in 147 patients with use of the cemented metal-backed Miller-Galante prosthesis. The average age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was sixty-six years. The purpose of the present study was to report the updated results of this series after a mean duration of follow-up of twenty years. Sixty-two patients (seventy knees) were living, and seven had been lost to follow-up. Eleven knees had undergone conversion to total knee arthroplasty, three had had an addition of a patellofemoral prosthesis, and five had had polyethylene exchange. Ten knees had had revision since the three to ten-year evaluation. The reasons for revision included progression of osteoarthritis in twelve knees, aseptic loosening (which had been absent at the three to ten-year evaluation) in two knees, and polyethylene wear (which was treated with liner exchange at an average of twelve years) in five knees. The average clinical and functional Knee Society scores were 91 and 88 points, respectively, at the time of the latest follow-up. The average flexion was 127° (range, 80° to 145°). We concluded that modern cemented metal-backed unicompartmental implants, evaluated at a mean of twenty years of follow-up in patients with osteoarthritis that was limited to one tibiofemoral compartment of the knee, provided durable pain relief and long-term restoration of knee function without compromising future conversion to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23677357     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Alexandre Lunebourg; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Faster return to sport after robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  R Canetti; C Batailler; C Bankhead; P Neyret; E Servien; S Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a computer model-based evaluation.

Authors:  Joseph F Konopka; Andreas H Gomoll; Thomas S Thornhill; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Is isolated insert exchange a valuable choice for polyethylene wear in metal-backed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lunebourg; Sébastien Parratte; Alexandre Galland; François Lecuire; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Negrín; Gonzalo Ferrer; Magaly Iñiguez; Jaime Duboy; Manuel Saavedra; Nicolas Reyes Larraín; Nicolas Jabes; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 6.  Lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA): contemporary indications, surgical technique, and results.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Matthew P Abdel; Sébastien Parratte; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Native rotational knee kinematics is restored after lateral UKA but not after medial UKA.

Authors:  Keizo Wada; Daisuke Hamada; Tomoya Takasago; Akihiro Nitta; Tomohiro Goto; Ichiro Tonogai; Yoshihiro Tsuruo; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement.

Authors:  H Pandit; F Mancuso; C Jenkins; W F M Jackson; A J Price; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Outcomes of Bi-unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Medial and Lateral Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Michele Mercurio; Giorgio Gasparini; Filippo Familiari; Davide Castioni; Olimpio Galasso
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 1.033

10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anatole V Wiik; Victoria Manning; Robin K Strachan; Andrew A Amis; Justin Peter Cobb
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.