Literature DB >> 23677351

Does seed mass drive the differences in relative growth rate between growth forms?

Jennie Houghton1, Ken Thompson, Mark Rees.   

Abstract

The idea that herbaceous plants have higher relative growth rates (RGRs) compared with woody plants is fundamental to many of the most influential theories in plant ecology. This difference in growth rate is thought to reflect systematic variation in physiology, allocation and leaf construction. Previous studies documenting this effect have, however, ignored differences in seed mass. As woody species often have larger seeds and RGR is negatively correlated with seed mass, it is entirely possible the lower RGRs observed in woody species is a consequence of having larger seeds rather than different growth strategies. Using a synthesis of the published literature, we explored the relationship between RGR and growth form, accounting for the effects of seed mass and study-specific effects (e.g. duration of study and pot volume), using a mixed-effects model. The model showed that herbaceous species do indeed have higher RGRs than woody species, and that the difference was independent of seed mass, thus at all seed masses, herbaceous species on average grow faster than woody ones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  plant strategies; relative growth rate; seed mass

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23677351      PMCID: PMC3673064          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  6 in total

1.  Partitioning the components of relative growth rate: how important is plant size variation?

Authors:  Mark Rees; Colin P Osborne; F Ian Woodward; Stephen P Hulme; Lindsay A Turnbull; Samuel H Taylor
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Modulation of relative growth rate and its components by water stress in Mediterranean species with different growth forms.

Authors:  Jeroni Galmés; Josep Cifre; Hipólito Medrano; Jaume Flexas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species.

Authors:  Eva Grotkopp; Marcel Rejmánek; Thomas L Rost
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Carlo Remkes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Understanding seedling growth relationships through specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration: generalisations across growth forms and growth irradiance.

Authors:  Ian J Wright; Mark Westoby
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Plant growth rates and seed size: a re-evaluation.

Authors:  Lindsay A Turnbull; Christopher D Philipson; Drew W Purves; Rebecca L Atkinson; Jennifer Cunniff; Anne Goodenough; Yann Hautier; Jennie Houghton; Toby R Marthews; Colin P Osborne; Cloé Paul-Victor; Karen E Rose; Philippe Saner; Samuel H Taylor; F Ian Woodward; Andy Hector; Mark Rees
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.499

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do key dimensions of seed and seedling functional trait variation capture variation in recruitment probability?

Authors:  Julie E Larson; Roger L Sheley; Stuart P Hardegree; Paul S Doescher; Jeremy J James
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Prioritisation of native legume species for further evaluation as potential forage crops in water-limited agricultural systems in South Africa.

Authors:  Francuois L Müller; Lincoln M Raitt; Samson B M Chimphango; M Igshaan Samuels; Clement F Cupido; J Stephen Boatwright; Richard Knight; Marike Trytsman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Adaptation and constraint shape the evolution of growth patterns in passerine birds across the globe.

Authors:  Vladimír Remeš; Beata Matysioková; Jakub Vrána
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Why Be a Shrub? A Basic Model and Hypotheses for the Adaptive Values of a Common Growth Form.

Authors:  Frank Götmark; Elin Götmark; Anna M Jensen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.