OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate patient perceptions of subcutaneous denosumab or oral alendronate in postmenopausal women with or at risk for osteoporosis and how these perceptions influence adherence. METHODS:Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomized to denosumab 60 mg every 6 months for 1 year (treatment period 1 [TP1]) followed by alendronate 70 mg once weekly for 1 year (treatment period 2 [TP2]), or vice versa. Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire data were collected at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months; a necessity-concerns differential (NCD) was calculated for each time point. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influences of baseline characteristics on nonadherence. RESULTS:Participants included 250 women (alendronate/denosumab, n = 124; denosumab/alendronate, n = 126). During TP1, the NCD at month 6 was higher with denosumab than with alendronate (P = 0.0076). In TP2, the NCD was higher for women switched to denosumab than for women switched to alendronate at 6 months (P = 0.0126) and 12 months (P = 0.4605). Denosumab was preferred to alendronate regardless of treatment sequence (P < 0.0001). Covariate analysis revealed that higher TP2 baseline necessity scores were associated with lower odds of nonadherence (P = 0.0055), whereas higher concerns about medication scores were associated with higher odds of nonadherence (P = 0.0247). Higher NCD scores were also associated with lower odds of nonadherence (P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred denosumab to alendronate while on treatment and had more positive perceptions of denosumab than alendronate. These perceptions were associated with better adherence.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate patient perceptions of subcutaneous denosumab or oral alendronate in postmenopausal women with or at risk for osteoporosis and how these perceptions influence adherence. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomized to denosumab 60 mg every 6 months for 1 year (treatment period 1 [TP1]) followed by alendronate 70 mg once weekly for 1 year (treatment period 2 [TP2]), or vice versa. Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire data were collected at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months; a necessity-concerns differential (NCD) was calculated for each time point. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influences of baseline characteristics on nonadherence. RESULTS:Participants included 250 women (alendronate/denosumab, n = 124; denosumab/alendronate, n = 126). During TP1, the NCD at month 6 was higher with denosumab than with alendronate (P = 0.0076). In TP2, the NCD was higher for women switched to denosumab than for women switched to alendronate at 6 months (P = 0.0126) and 12 months (P = 0.4605). Denosumab was preferred to alendronate regardless of treatment sequence (P < 0.0001). Covariate analysis revealed that higher TP2 baseline necessity scores were associated with lower odds of nonadherence (P = 0.0055), whereas higher concerns about medication scores were associated with higher odds of nonadherence (P = 0.0247). Higher NCD scores were also associated with lower odds of nonadherence (P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS:Participants preferred denosumab to alendronate while on treatment and had more positive perceptions of denosumab than alendronate. These perceptions were associated with better adherence.
Authors: Julie L Ellis; Christine R Kovach; Michael Fendrich; Oluwatoyin Olukotun; Vanessa K Baldwin; Weiming Ke; Barbara Nichols Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: S Migliaccio; D Francomano; E Romagnoli; C Marocco; R Fornari; G Resmini; A Buffa; G Di Pietro; S Corvaglia; F Gimigliano; A Moretti; A de Sire; N Malavolta; A Lenzi; E A Greco; G Iolascon Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: S L Silverman; E Siris; D L Kendler; D Belazi; J P Brown; D T Gold; E M Lewiecki; A Papaioannou; C Simonelli; I Ferreira; A Balasubramanian; P Dakin; P Ho; S Siddhanti; B Stolshek; C Recknor Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; Gwendolyn Ledford; Sara A Hoffman; Rowland W Chang; Kenzie A Cameron Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 2.362