Literature DB >> 23676574

Safety of multiple aeroallergen rush immunotherapy using a modified schedule.

Viviana M Temiño1, Pingsheng Wu, Janet Konig, John M Fahrenholz.   

Abstract

Rush immunotherapy (RIT) accelerates the build-up phase of traditional IT. The biggest potential benefit of using RIT is decreased time to symptomatic improvement. However, aeroallergen RIT carries an increased risk of systemic reaction (SR) compared with traditional IT. This study was designed to assess the safety of a modified 1-day multiple aeroallergen RIT protocol. A retrospective chart review was performed of 138 patients from an outpatient, university-based allergy practice who underwent RIT between November 2007 and February 2011. The RIT protocol consisted of eight injections over 5 hours, and stopped at one 10-fold dilution below the maintenance vial. All patients were premedicated on the same day of RIT with prednisone and histamine 1 and 2 receptor blockers. Primary end point observed was rate of SR. One hundred thirty-eight patients received a total of 2911 RIT injections. Thirty- eight patients (28%) had SRs. The SR rate per injection was 1.3%. Most of the reactions (82%) occurred after the last dose of the protocol. No patients with SR had severe anaphylaxis requiring emergency department support or hospitalization. The post-RIT SR rate was within the range seen with traditional IT. Well-controlled asthmatic patients were not at increased risk of SR compared with nonasthmatic patients. Modification of RIT to end at one 10-fold dilution below the maintenance vial for multiple aeroallergen RIT did not significantly decrease the SR rate compared with other protocols that end at the maintenance vial. Unlike hymenoptera RIT, aeroallergen RIT continues to be associated with a high risk of SR compared with traditional IT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23676574     DOI: 10.2500/aap.2013.34.3651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc        ISSN: 1088-5412            Impact factor:   2.587


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chinese Guideline on allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Yixiao Bao; Jianjun Chen; Lei Cheng; Yinshi Guo; Suling Hong; Weijia Kong; He Lai; Houyong Li; Huabin Li; Jing Li; Tianying Li; Xiaoping Lin; Shixi Liu; Zheng Liu; Hongfei Lou; Juan Meng; Qianhui Qiu; Kunling Shen; Wei Tang; Zezhang Tao; Chengshuo Wang; Xiangdong Wang; Qingyu Wei; Li Xiang; Hua Xie; Yu Xu; Gehua Zhang; Yuan Zhang; Yiwu Zheng; Yuxiang Zhi; Dehua Chen; Haiyu Hong; Quansheng Li; Lin Liu; Yifan Meng; Nan Wang; Yihui Wang; Yue Zhou; Luo Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Allergen Immunotherapy: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Marek Jutel; Anna Kosowska; Sylwia Smolinska
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.764

3.  Evaluation of safety and tolerability of a rush up-dosing allergen-specific immunotherapy with grass pollen, birch, hazel, and alder allergoid in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma.

Authors:  Giovanni Traina; Alberto Martelli; Salvatore Barberi; Amelia Licari; Gian Luigi Marseglia; Maria Angela Tosca; Giorgio Ciprandi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Clinical evaluation of rush immunotherapy using house dust mite allergen in Japanese asthmatics.

Authors:  Takahiro Uchida; Kazuyuki Nakagome; Hidetoshi Iemura; Erika Naito; Sachiko Miyauchi; Yoshitaka Uchida; Tomoyuki Soma; Makoto Nagata
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2021-07-19

5.  An accelerated dose escalation with a grass pollen allergoid is safe and well-tolerated: a randomized open label phase II trial.

Authors:  A M Chaker; B Al-Kadah; U Luther; U Neumann; M Wagenmann
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.871

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.