Literature DB >> 23676442

Measuring vaccine confidence: analysis of data obtained by a media surveillance system used to analyse public concerns about vaccines.

Heidi J Larson1, David M D Smith, Pauline Paterson, Melissa Cumming, Elisabeth Eckersberger, Clark C Freifeld, Isaac Ghinai, Caitlin Jarrett, Louisa Paushter, John S Brownstein, Lawrence C Madoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intensity, spread, and effects of public opinion about vaccines are growing as new modes of communication speed up information sharing, contributing to vaccine hesitancy, refusals, and disease outbreaks. We aimed to develop a new application of existing surveillance systems to detect and characterise early signs of vaccine issues. We also aimed to develop a typology of concerns and a way to assess the priority of each concern.
METHODS: Following preliminary research by The Vaccine Confidence Project, media reports (eg, online articles, blogs, government reports) were obtained using the HealthMap automated data collection system, adapted to monitor online reports about vaccines, vaccination programmes, and vaccine-preventable diseases. Any reports that did not meet the inclusion criteria--any reference to a human vaccine or vaccination campaign or programme that was accessible online--were removed from analysis. Reports were manually analysed for content and categorised by concerns, vaccine, disease, location, and source of report, and overall positive or negative sentiment towards vaccines. They were then given a priority level depending on the seriousness of the reported event and time of event occurrence. We used descriptive statistics to analyse the data collected during a period of 1 year, after refinements to the search terms and processes had been made.
FINDINGS: We analysed data from 10,380 reports (from 144 countries) obtained between May 1, 2011, and April 30, 2012. 7171 (69%) contained positive or neutral content and 3209 (31%) contained negative content. Of the negative reports, 1977 (24%) were associated with impacts on vaccine programmes and disease outbreaks; 1726 (21%) with beliefs, awareness, and perceptions; 1371 (16%) with vaccine safety; and 1336 (16%) with vaccine delivery programmes. We were able to disaggregate the data by country and vaccine type, and monitor evolution of events over time and location in specific regions where vaccine concerns were high.
INTERPRETATION: Real-time monitoring and analysis of vaccine concerns over time and location could help immunisation programmes to tailor more effective and timely strategies to address specific public concerns. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23676442     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70108-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  63 in total

Review 1.  Exposing concerns about vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Cobos Muñoz; Laura Monzón Llamas; Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Public trust and vaccine acceptance--international perspectives.

Authors:  Sachiko Ozawa; Meghan L Stack
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Negotiating vaccine acceptance in an era of reluctance.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Epidemiology of vaccine hesitancy in the United States.

Authors:  Mariam Siddiqui; Daniel A Salmon; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Adversomics: a new paradigm for vaccine safety and design.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitaker; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.217

6.  Enhancing the work of the Department of Health and Human Services national vaccine program in global immunization: recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on September 12, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Public health: An injection of trust.

Authors:  Michael Eisenstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Citation Sentiment Analysis in Clinical Trial Papers.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Yaoyun Zhang; Yonghui Wu; Jingqi Wang; Xiao Dong; Hua Xu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 9.  To close the childhood immunization gap, we need a richer understanding of parents' decision-making.

Authors:  Paul Corben; Julie Leask
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Overcoming barriers in HPV vaccination and screening programs.

Authors:  Alex Vorsters; Marc Arbyn; Marc Baay; Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé; Sharon Hanley; Emilie Karafillakis; Pier Luigi Lopalco; Kevin G Pollock; Joanne Yarwood; Pierre Van Damme
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2017-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.