BACKGROUND: Patient localization can improve workflow in outpatient settings, which might lead to lower costs. The existing wireless local area network (WLAN) architecture in many hospitals opens up the possibility of adopting real-time patient tracking systems for capturing and processing position data; once captured, these data can be linked with clinical patient data. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of a WLAN-based real-time patient localization system for tracking outpatients in our level I trauma center. METHODS: Outpatients from April to August 2009 were included in the study, which was performed in two different stages. In phase I, patient tracking was performed with the real-time location system, but acquired data were not displayed to the personnel. In phase II tracking, the acquired data were automatically collected and displayed. Total treatment time was the primary outcome parameter. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple linear regression, with the significance level set at 0.05. Covariates included sex, age, type of encounter, prioritization, treatment team, number of residents, and radiographic imaging. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: 1045 patients were included in our study (540 in phase I and 505 in phase 2). An overall improvement of efficiency, as determined by a significantly decreased total treatment time (23.7%) from phase I to phase II, was noted. Additionally, significantly lower treatment times were noted for phase II patients even when other factors were considered (increased numbers of residents, the addition of imaging diagnostics, and comparison among various localization zones). CONCLUSIONS: WLAN-based real-time patient localization systems can reduce process inefficiencies associated with manual patient identification and tracking.
BACKGROUND:Patient localization can improve workflow in outpatient settings, which might lead to lower costs. The existing wireless local area network (WLAN) architecture in many hospitals opens up the possibility of adopting real-time patient tracking systems for capturing and processing position data; once captured, these data can be linked with clinical patient data. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of a WLAN-based real-time patient localization system for tracking outpatients in our level I trauma center. METHODS: Outpatients from April to August 2009 were included in the study, which was performed in two different stages. In phase I, patient tracking was performed with the real-time location system, but acquired data were not displayed to the personnel. In phase II tracking, the acquired data were automatically collected and displayed. Total treatment time was the primary outcome parameter. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple linear regression, with the significance level set at 0.05. Covariates included sex, age, type of encounter, prioritization, treatment team, number of residents, and radiographic imaging. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: 1045 patients were included in our study (540 in phase I and 505 in phase 2). An overall improvement of efficiency, as determined by a significantly decreased total treatment time (23.7%) from phase I to phase II, was noted. Additionally, significantly lower treatment times were noted for phase II patients even when other factors were considered (increased numbers of residents, the addition of imaging diagnostics, and comparison among various localization zones). CONCLUSIONS: WLAN-based real-time patient localization systems can reduce process inefficiencies associated with manual patient identification and tracking.
Entities:
Keywords:
Real time location system; WLAN; hospital; patient tracking
Authors: Truls Ostbye; David F Lobach; Dianne Cheesborough; Ann Marie M Lee; Katrina M Krause; Vic Hasselblad; Darryl Bright Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Paul Nagy; Ivan George; Wendy Bernstein; Jesus Caban; Rosemary Klein; Reuben Mezrich; Adrian Park Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Timo Stübig; Christian Zeckey; William Min; Musa Citak; Christian Krettek; Tobias Hüfner; Ralph Gaulke Journal: Technol Health Care Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.285