| Literature DB >> 23675460 |
Wei Xin1, Zhiqin Lin, Xiaoying Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) has been related to the increased risk of future congestive heart failure (CHF) events. However, the overall quantitative estimate of predictive ability of OH for CHF has not been determined. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between OH and incident CHF.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23675460 PMCID: PMC3652866 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Search and selection of studies included in the meta-analysis.
Baseline characteristics of prospective cohort studies included in the meta-analysis of orthostatic hypotension and incident heart failure.
| Study | Country | Population | Baseline year | Ntotal | Male | Agerange | Meanage | BMI | HTN | DM | BaselineCAD | OH definition | OHprevalence |
| % | years | years | kg/m2 | % | % | % | % | ||||||
|
| the Netherlands | Community-living individuals | 1990∼1993 | 5064 | 38.4 | 55∼99 | 68.1 | 26.2 | 26.9 | 8.9 | 0 | SBP decline ≥20 mmHg or DBPdecline ≥10 mmHg from supineto standing (at 1, 2 or 3 minutes) | 17.8 |
|
| Sweden | Population-basedmiddle-agedindividuals | 1974∼1992 | 32669 | 68.2 | 26∼61 | 45.6 | 24.6 | 40.2 | 4.7 | 0.4 | SBP decline ≥20 mmHg or DBPdecline ≥10 mmHg from supineto standing (within 3 minutes) | 6.1 |
|
| China | Elderly individualswho underwenthealth screening | 2010 | 1174 | 95.6 | 65∼ | 81.1 | 25.1 | 72.3 | 41.2 | 7.8 | SBP decline ≥20 mmHg or DBPdecline ≥10 mmHg from supineto standing (within 3 minutes) | 25.6 |
|
| USA | Community-livingmiddle-agedindividuals | 1987∼1989 | 12363 | 45.3 | 45∼64 | 54.1 | 27.5 | 32.3 | 10.9 | 4.4 | SBP decline ≥20 mmHg or DBPdecline ≥10 mmHg from supineto standing (within 2 minutes) | 5.0 |
BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; CAD, coronary artery disease; OH, orthostatic hypotension; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
Congestive heart failure outcome definitions and follow up data in the prospective cohort studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Study | CHF outcome definition | N total | Follow-up | N cases | Person-yearfollow-up | Event rates | Adjusted factors | Studyquality |
| years | per 1000person-years | |||||||
|
| Documented CHF (coded asI-50 for ICD-10, validatedusing European Heart failureguidelines) from GP, CHFhospitalization/death | 5064 | 6.6 | 571 | 33422 | 17.1 | Age, sex, smoking, use ofantihypertensive medications,BMI, SBP, DBP, DM, TCand HDL-C | 9 |
|
| CHF hospitalization (coded as428 for ICD-9 or I-50 or I-11.0for ICD-10) documented bynational hospital dischargeregistry | 32669 | 24.0 | 1293 | 784056 | 1.7 | Age, sex, smoking, use ofantihypertensive medications,BMI, SBP, DBP, DM and TC | 9 |
|
| CHF hospitalization documentedby medical records anddischarge diagnosis byattending physicians | 1174 | 1.0 | 19 | 1174 | 16.2 | Age, sex, smoking, restingHR, BMI, SBP, DBP, DM,TC and prevalent CAD | 7 |
|
| CHF hospitalization/death(coded as 428 for ICD-9or I-50 for ICD-10)documented by hospitaldischarge registry or deathcertificate | 12363 | 17.5 | 1720 | 216353 | 8.0 | Age, sex, race, smoking, alcoholuse, educational level, restingHR, BMI, SBP, DM, HTN,LVH and prevalent CAD | 9 |
Quality of the included studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (range, 1∼9 stars). OH, orthostatic hypotension; CHF, congestive heart failure; GP, general practitioners; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, heart rate; CAD, coronary artery disease; HTN, hypertension; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
Figure 2Adjusted hazard ratio of congestive heart failure in subjects with orthostatic hypotension at baseline compared those without orthostatic hypotension.
CI, denotes confidence interval; the size of each square is proportional to the study’s weight (inverse of variance – IV).
Sensitivity analysis.
| Studies | p value for heterogeneity | I2 | Pooled HR and 95% CI | p value for overall effect |
|
| 0.07 | 57% | 1.30 [1.09, 1.55] | p = 0.004 |
|
| 0.17 | 44% | 1.39 [1.23, 1.57] | p<0.001 |
|
| 0.05 | 67% | 1.35 [1.19, 1.53] | p<0.001 |
|
| 0.04 | 70% | 1.30 [1.17, 1.45] | p<0.001 |
|
| 0.60 | 0% | 1.18 [1.03, 1.35] | p = 0.01 |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Adjusted hazard ratio of congestive heart failure in subjects with orthostatic hypotension at baseline compared those without orthostatic hypotension stratified by the age ranges (A) and gender (B) of the subjects.
CI, denotes confidence interval; the size of each square is proportional to the study’s weight (inverse of variance – IV).
Figure 4Adjusted hazard ratio of congestive heart failure in subjects with orthostatic hypotension at baseline compared those without orthostatic hypotension stratified by the comorbidities of hypertension (A) and diabetes mellitus (B) of the subjects.
CI, denotes confidence interval; the size of each square is proportional to the study’s weight (inverse of variance – IV).
Figure 5Funnel plots with trim and fill.
The black dots present the identified studies included in the meta-analysis; the empty dot presents the estimated missing study after adjustment for publication bias.