| Literature DB >> 23675252 |
Mamdouh M Shawki1, Mohammed A Elblbesy, Thanaa E Shalaby, Metwali A Qotb, Youssef S Youssef.
Abstract
The Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is an effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous solid tumors. Electric field is applied to tumor nodules to enhance the delivery/distribution of a non-permeable or poorly permeable chemotherapeutic agent into the tumor cells thereby increasing local concentration of anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using two types of electric fields in ECT, pulsed sine waves and direct current (DC) application in addition to intra-tumoral injection of bleomycin (BLM), a cytotoxic drug for treating Ehrlich tumor. The electric fields were delivered through six stainless steel needle electrodes inserted into the tumor. Tumor volume, tumor mass, percentage of fragmented DNA in the tumor tissue, relative spleen mass/total body mass, mortality rate, histological and ultrastructural examinations were investigated in each group. There were 40% complete response (CR) and 60% partial response (PR) in the group treated with DC as the electric field source of ECT, while 0% (CR) and only 25% (PR) were found in the group treated with pulsed sine wave ECT. We concluded that the utilization of low dose DC for ECT gives better results than the low voltage pulsed sine waves in treating Ehrlich tumor which may be due to the dual effects of electrochemical reactions evoked by DC application and the anti-cancer activity of BLM.Entities:
Keywords: bleomycin; direct current; electrochemotherapy; low electric field
Year: 2012 PMID: 23675252 PMCID: PMC3614857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1550-9702
Figure 1Six electrodes configuration used in this study.
Figure 2Quantitative measurements of the tumors against time (days) after treatment (a) tumor volume (b) tumor mass.
Figure 3(a) Relative spleen mass/total body weight r (m) against time (days) after treatment (b) percent of DNA fragmentation/0.1 g tumor mass against time (days) after treatment.
Figure 4“a-c” Tumor photos after 18 days of treatment (a) big volume for G0 (b) decrease in tumor volume for GI (c) no tumor mass can be detected for GIII. (d) The percent of dead mice against time (days) after treatment.
Figure 5“a-c”: Light micrographs (H&E, 400X) after 18 days of treatment: (a) active malignant nuclei for G0 tumor (b) some active nuclei and some necrotic area for GI tumor (c) complete necrotic area for GIII tumor. “d-f”:electron micrographs (10000X) after 18 days of treatment (d) for GI tumor: irregular nuclear membrane (INM), clumped chromatin (CC), ruptured cytoplasm (R C), degenerative organelles and many vacuoles (V) were found (e) for GIV tumor: some dead cells appeared with swollen cytoplasm, the mitochondria (M) were large, swollen and with degenerated cristae, diffused rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), fragmented nuclei (N) and prominent Golgi apparatus (G) (f) for GIII tumor: complete necrotic area.