| Literature DB >> 23675161 |
Rajinder Singh Gujral1, Sk Manirul Haque, Prem Shanker.
Abstract
A simple and sensitive spectrophotometric method was developed for the determination of Oxacillin sodium. The method was based on charge transfer complexation reaction of the drug with iodine in methanol - dichloromethane medium. The absorbance was measured at 365 nm against the reagent blank. Under optimized experimental conditions, Beer's law is obeyed in the concentration ranges 2-8 μg/ml for Oxacillin Sodium. The method was validated for specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of quantitation, robustness and ruggedness. The LOD and LOQ value were 0.39 and 1.18 μg/ml respectively. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of Oxacillin sodium in Human Urine samples with good accuracy and precision.Entities:
Keywords: Oxacillin sodium; human urine; iodine; spectrophotometer; validation
Year: 2009 PMID: 23675161 PMCID: PMC3614802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1550-9702
Figure 1Structure of Oxacillin Sodium.
Figure 2Absorption spectra of (a) 5.66 × 10 −3 M Oxacillin sodium (50 μg/ml) in methanol (b) Blank Solution: 2.95 × 10 −1 M iodine in dichloromethane (c) Sample Solution: 2.95 × 10 −1 M iodine in dichloromethane + 1.81 × 10 −3 M Oxacillin sodium (50 μg/ml) in methanol.
Figure 3Plot of 1/D0 and [A0]/AAD for the proposed method.
Figure 4Jobs Plot for stoichiometric ratio between oxacillin sodium and Iodine (2.03 × 10 −3 M each).
Figure 5Effect of the volume of Iodine (0.05 %) on the absorbance; keeping constant 5.0 μg/ml Oxacillin sodium.
Figure 6Linearity and linear regression equation of the proposed method.
Summary of optical and regression characteristics of the proposed method
| Parameters | Oxacillin Sodium |
|---|---|
| Linear dynamic range (μg/ml) | 2.0–8.0 |
| Regression equation | Y = 7.05 × 10−2 |
| Sa | 6.55 × 10−4 |
| t Sa
| 1.46 × 10−3 |
| Sb | 1.41 × 10−5 |
| t Sb
| 3.13 × 10−5 |
| Correlation coefficient (r) | 0.9999 |
| LOD (μg/ml) | 3.90 × 10−1 |
| LOQ (μg/ml) | 1.18 |
| Variance (So 2) of calibration line | 1.04 × 10−6 |
With respect to Y = a + b X, where X is the concentration in μg/ml, Y is Absorbance;
Confidenceinterval of the intercept and slope at 95% confidence level and ten degrees of freedom (t=2.228).
Summary of accuracy and precision results of the proposed method in pure form
| Proposed methods | Amount (μg/ml)
| RSD % | REC. | SAE
| C.L. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taken | Found ± SD | |||||
| Intra day assay | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.002 | 0.119 | 99.990 | 1.1 × 10−3 | 3.0 × 10−3 |
| 5.00 | 4.999 ± 0.003 | 0.068 | 99.980 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 4.2 × 10−3 | |
| 8.00 | 7.999 ± 0.006 | 0.074 | 99.986 | 2.6 × 10−3 | 7.3 × 10−3 | |
| Inter day assay | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.003 | 0.162 | 99.990 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 4.2 × 10−3 |
| 5.00 | 4.997 ± 0.010 | 0.203 | 99.940 | 4.5 × 10−3 | 1.3× 10−2 | |
| 8.00 | 8.007 ± 0.014 | 0.175 | 100.085 | 6.3 × 10−3 | 1.7 × 10−2 | |
Mean for 5 independent analyses;
SAE, standard analytical error;
C.L., confidence limit at 95% confidence level and 4 degrees of freedom (t=2.776).
Summary of accuracy and precision results of the proposed method after adding excipients
| Excipients | Amount (μg/ml)
| RSD % | REC. | SAEb | C.L.c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taken | Found ± SDa | |||||
| Glucose | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.004 | 0.210 | 99.980 | 0.0019 | 0.0053 |
| Fructose | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.011 | 0.569 | 99.970 | 0.0051 | 0.0142 |
| Sucrose | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.014 | 0.691 | 99.949 | 0.0062 | 0.0172 |
| Cellulose | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.010 | 0.512 | 99.946 | 0.0046 | 0.0128 |
| Starch | 2.00 | 2.000 ± 0.005 | 0.232 | 100.02 | 0.0021 | 0.0058 |
| Lactose | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.017 | 0.851 | 99.949 | 0.0076 | 0.0211 |
| Magnesium Stearate | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.012 | 0.601 | 99.927 | 0.0054 | 0.0150 |
| Sodium Stearyl Fumarate | 2.00 | 1.999 ± 0.009 | 0.464 | 99.970 | 0.0042 | 0.0117 |
Summary of comparison results of the proposed method with reference method (13) at 95% confidence level
| Parameters | Proposed method | Reference method ( |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery (%) | 99.987 | 99.938 |
| RSD | 0.245 | 0.480 |
| t | 0.51 | |
| F | 2.85 | |
| θL | 0.985 | |
| θU | 1.008 | |
Application of the proposed method to the determination of Oxacillin sodium with spiked human urine samples
| Amount added (μg/ml) | Amount found (μg/ml) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 1.9412 | 97.06 |
| 3.0 | 2.9286 | 97.62 |
| 4.0 | 3.9257 | 98.14 |
| 5.0 | 4.9176 | 98.35 |
| 6.0 | 5.9093 | 98.49 |
| 8.0 | 7.8919 | 98.65 |
| 98.05 | ||
| RSD | 0.615 | |