| Literature DB >> 23675076 |
Abstract
The proposed algorithm presents an application of 3D-SPIHT algorithm to color volumetric dicom medical images using 3D wavelet decomposition and a 3D spatial dependence tree. The wavelet decomposition is accomplished with biorthogonal 9/7 filters. 3D-SPIHT is the modern-day benchmark for three dimensional image compressions. The three-dimensional coding is based on the observation that the sequences of images are contiguous in the temporal axis and there is no motion between slices. Therefore, the 3D discrete wavelet transform can fully exploit the inter-slices correlations. The set partitioning techniques involve a progressive coding of the wavelet coefficients. The 3D-SPIHT is implemented and the Rate-distortion (Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) vs. bit rate) performances are presented for volumetric medical datasets by using biorthogonal 9/7. The results are compared with the previous results of JPEG 2000 standards. Results show that 3D-SPIHT method exploits the color space relationships as well as maintaining the full embeddedness required by color image sequences compression and gives better performance in terms of the PSNR and compression ratio than the JPEG 2000. The results suggest an effective practical implementation for PACS applications.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-SPIHT; JPEG 2000; PACS; biorthogonal; dicom; wavelet
Year: 2008 PMID: 23675076 PMCID: PMC3614689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1550-9702
Figure 1RGB color cube.
Figure 23D decomposition.
Figure 33D Dyadic Tree Structure.
Properties of Biorthogonal filters
| Biorthogonal | ||
| Bior | ||
| Nr = 1 | Nd = 1,3,5 | |
| Nr = 2 | Nd = 2,4,6,8 | |
| Nr = 3 | Nd = 1,3,5,7,9 | |
| Nr = 4 | Nd = 4 | |
| Nr = 5 | Nd = 5 | |
| Nr = 6 | Nd = 8 | |
| 2Nr+1 for rec., 2Nd+1 for dec. | ||
| yes | ||
r, reconstruction; d, decomposition.
Fig. 4aoriginal image
Fig. 4dcompression at 12.00 bpp
Fig. 5aoriginal image
Fig. 5dcompression at 12.00 bpp
Fig. 6aoriginal image
Fig. 6dcompression at 12.00 bpp
Fig. 7aoriginal image
Fig. 7dcompression at 12.00 bpp
RESULTS FOR CHEST IMAGE
| Figures | Rate in bpp | MSE | Cr | PSNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. | 1 | 80.7231 | 93.75 | 77.2596 |
| Fig. | 4 | 0.2980 | 75 | 101.5872 |
| Fig. | 12 | 1.42E-04 | 25 | 134.794 |
RESULTS FOR SKULL IMAGE
| Figures | Rate in bpp | MSE | Cr | PSNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. | 1 | 20.166 | 93.75 | 83.283 |
| Fig. | 4 | 0.005 | 75 | 119.312 |
| Fig. | 12 | 6.063E-09 | 25 | 178.503 |
RESULTS FOR SHOULDER IMAGE
| Figures | Rate in bpp | MSE | CR | PSNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. | 1 | 28.5680 | 93.75 | 81.7708 |
| Fig. | 4 | 0.0511 | 75 | 109.2454 |
| Fig. | 12 | 2.03E-05 | 25 | 143.245 |
RESULTS FOR WRIST IMAGE
| Figures | Rate in bpp | MSE | CR | PSNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fig. | 1 | 19.6206 | 93.75 | 83.4025 |
| Fig. | 4 | 0.05 | 75 | 109.340 |
| Fig. | 12 | 7.32E-09 | 37.5 | 177.684 |
Comparison of 3D DCT, 3D JPEG2000 and 3D SPIHT
| 3D DCT | 3D JPEG 2000 ( | 3D SPIHT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncompressed image size in MB | Compressed image size in MB | CR in % | Uncompressed image size in MB | Compressed image size in MB | CR in % | Uncompressed image size in MB | Compressed image size in MB | CR in % |
| 134.2 | 93.9 | 30 | 224 | 75.8 | 66 | 134.2 | 25.5 | 81 |
| 268.4 | 142.2 | 47 | 310 | 120 | 61 | 268.4 | 67.1 | 75 |
This tabulation reveals that the compression ratio and PSNR are better than JPEG 2000 compression (2).