Bone resorption in incompletely impacted mandibular third molars and acute pericoronitis.

Acute pericoronitis (AP) arises frequently in incompletely impacted mandibular third molars, but it remains unknown whether bone resorption in aging is associated with acute inflammation of the third molar. We conducted an experiment to compare the ratio of bone resorption to root length in the distal surface of the second molar (A), the proximal surface (B), and distal surface (C) in mesio-angular, incompletely impacted third molars in 27 young and 58 older adults with AP and 77 young and 79 older adults without a history of AP. Bone resorption in A, B, and C in older adults with AP demonstrated a significantly higher ratio when compared to those without AP, whereas there was no difference between those with and without AP in young adults except for B in women. However, there were no differences between bone resorption in B with AP in young and older women, and between bone resorption in C with AP in young and older adults. These indicate that AP and bone resorption are associated with incompletely impacted mandibular third molars in older adults.

Introduction

Acute pericoronitis (AP) is frequently seen in incompletely impacted third molars, and leads to a marked increase in bone resorption, although considerable radiologic changes may occur without notable symptoms, involving inclination of the tooth and the state of impaction after the usual age of eruption.1 Moreover, the alveolar bone loss on the distal side of the second molar has been well described in horizontal impacted third molar, regardless of the presence of AP.2–7 On the other hand, a correlation between the inflammatory infiltrate and histological alveolar bone loss has been observed,8 and endothelial-derived cytokines,9 T cells,10–13 mast cells,14 and interleukin-1 (IL-1)15,16 may be involved in bone resorption. Hou and colleagues17 noted that intact Toll-like receptor (TLR) function mediates increased proinflammatory responses and bone destruction in response to mixed anaerobic infections, while there is a reduction of bone destruction in TLR4-17 and TLR2-deficient mice.18 Moreover, a transient inhibition of bone formation during acute inflammation has also been shown.19 However, it remains to be determined whether the level of bone resorption is associated with the emergence of AP. We postulated that AP in young individuals differed from that in the elderly possibly due to chronic inflammation in aging leading to bone resorption. The objective of the present study was to clarify the relationship between the degree of radiolucency and acute inflammation with aging in mesio-angular incomplete impaction.

Methods

Radiological examination of the following was performed: 12 teeth of 12 young men (mean age ± SD: 19.8 ± 1.5 years; range: 18–22 years), 32 teeth of 32 older men (mean age ± SD: 49.5 ± 6.1 years; range: 41–67 years), 15 teeth of 15 young women (mean age ± SD: 20.0 ± 1.5 years; range: 18–22 years), and 26 teeth of 26 older women (mean age ± SD: 50.5 ± 8.6 years; range: 41–82 years). On initial examination, these patients had acute inflammation with spontaneous pain, redness, and swelling of the gingiva around incompletely impacted mesio-angular mandibular third molars. Some patients also had functional disorders of mastication, trismus and/or difficulty in swallowing. Patients with AP were administered a dose of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs. Thirty-eight teeth of 30 young men (mean age ± SD, 20.2 ± 1.3 years; range: 18–22 years), 51 teeth of 49 older men (mean age ± SD, 47.4 ± 6.0 years; range: 41–68 years), 55 teeth of 47 young women (mean age ± SD, 20.5 ± 1.3 years; range: 18–22 years), and 33 teeth of 30 older women (mean age ± SD, 47.7 ± 6.2 years; range: 41–69 years) showed no features of inflammation. Moreover, the patients did not have any history of acute inflammation of the third molars. These patients were referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Matsumoto Dental University Hospital, for diagnosis and treatment between April 1985 and August 2005. All patients with AP on initial examination were selected, and those without AP were classified based on the absence of acute inflammation on initial examination, as well as their response to a questionnaire regarding the absence of acute inflammation. All the participants were Japanese, and all of them were covered by the Japanese health insurance system. Patients with the following conditions at the initial examination were excluded from the study: patients with apical radiolucency of the second or third molar, root fragment of the second or third molar, an unreadable crestal status because of teeth crowding between the second and third molars, restoration ending below the cemento-enamel junction of the second or third molar, cyst in the second and/or third molars, loss of the second molar, complete impaction of the third molar, a vertical third molar, distal inclination of the third molar, third molars with root curvatures angled more than 90° to the long axis of the tooth at the point close to the apex in the cervico-apical direction, and patients with immunosuppressive conditions, including AIDS.

Radiographs were obtained with an X-ray machine (Morita Corp., Tokyo or Asahi Roentgen Co., Kyoto, Japan) and Ultra- Speed Dental Film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) at 70 kVp and 20 mA in 0.32 s or Insight dental film (Eastman Kodak) at 70 kVp and 7 mA in 0.16 s using the parallel technique. Reference points for measurements are shown in Figure 1. The bone crest of the distal aspect of the second molar, that of the proximal aspect of the third molar, and that of the distal aspect of the third molar are shown as points A, B, and C, respectively. The bone crest is shown by the point where the periodontal space becomes parallel to the root surface. Resorption of the bone crest was assessed by visual observation using a millimeter ruler and 2 × magnification. Measurements were rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm. The radiographs were measured by the linear distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the alveolar crest and the cemento-enamel junction to the apex of both proximal and distal roots, respectively, and evaluated for the ratio of bone crest resorption against the root length from the cemento-enamel junction to the apex in the proximal and distal aspects of the third molar and the distal aspect of the second molar. Measurement of radiograms were performed twice by the same oral surgeon; the second time being performed after a period of few months without seeing the primary data. The mean values of both the measurements were calculated. Teeth with bone resorption which could not be measured, and thereby the length, at any point on either measurement were excluded from the study.

Figure 1

Schematic drawing presenting the method of measurement of the radiographic cervico-apical lengths and the distances between the cemento-enamel junction and crest of the bone on the long axis of the tooth. The distance was measured on both the proximal and distal aspects of the third molar.

Statistical analysis

Mean values ± SD of the age and mean ratios of the bone crest in the distal aspect in the second molar and those in the proximal and distal aspects in the third molar were calculated and analyzed statistically using Student t-test among patient groups with and without AP.

Results

Bone resorption in the distal aspect of the second molar (A), proximal (B) and distal (C) aspects of the third molar in young men with AP was not different from those without AP. Bone resorption in young adult women with AP was also not different from those without AP except in the proximal aspect of the third molar (B). Bone resorption in older adult men and women with AP was significantly higher than those without AP at the points of A, B, and C, respectively (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.01 in men, and p < 0.0001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 in women) (Table 1) (Figures 2–5).

Table 1

Bone resorption in young adults and older adults with or without AP

Age (y)	18–22			41<
AP	With	Without	P	With	Without	P
Mean ± SD of years of age (n: number of subjects)
Men	19.833 ± 1.467 (12)	20.167 ± 1.289 (30)	ns	49.469 ± 6.069 (32)	47.449 ± 6.000 (49)	ns
Women	20.000 ± 1.464 (15)	20.489 ± 1.266 (47)	ns	50.462 ± 8.613 (26)	47.700 ± 6.249 (30)	ns
Number of teeth
Men	12	38		32	51
Women	15	55		26	33
Bone resorption at the distal aspect of the second molar (A)
Men	0.227 ± 0.086a	0.290 ± 0.167a,b	ns	0.680 ± 0.249a	0.422 ± 0.209a,b	p < 0.0001
Women	0.187 ± 0.115a,b,c	0.261 ± 0.161a,b	ns	0.677 ± 0.186a	0.381 ± 0.166a,b	p < 0.0001
Bone resorption at the proximal aspect of the third molar (B)
Men	0.063 ± 0.074a,c	0.056 ± 0.056b	ns	0 253 ± 0 256a,c	0 090 ± 0 144a	p < 0.001
Women	0.086 ± 0.101c	0.041 ± 0.056a	p < 0.05	0.164 ± 0.206a	0.028 ± 0.059a	p < 0.001
Bone resorption at the distal aspect of the third molar (C)
Men	0.066 ± 0.06Sa	0.057 ± 0.069a	ns	0.200 ± 0.281a	0.063 ± 0.101a	P < 0.01
Women	0.068 ± 0.060b	0.077 ± 0.096a	ns	0.171 ± 0.249a	0.013 ± 0.039a	p < 0.001

Notes:

p < 0.0001,

p < 0.01,

p < 0.05.

Abbreviations: ns, net significant; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 2

Left mandibular third molar of an 18-year-old man without acute pericoronitis.

Figure 5

Right mandibular third molar of a 49-year-old woman with acute pericoronitis.

The level of bone resorption in the distal aspect of the second molars was 68% in older men, and 67.7% in older women, and significantly higher than those in the proximal surface (25.3%, p < 0.0001 in men, and 16.4%, p < 0.0001 in women, and distal (20%, p < 0.0001 in men, and 17.1%, p < 0.0001 in women) aspect with AP. The findings in older adults were similar to those in young adults with AP.

In older adults without AP, bone resorption between the distal aspect of the second molar (42.2% in men, and 38.1% in women) and the proximal aspect of the third molar (9% in men, and 2.8% in women), showed a significant difference (p < 0.0001 in both). The difference between bone resorption in the distal aspect of the second molar and the distal aspect of the third molar (6.3% in men, and 1.3% in women) was also significant (p < 0.0001 in both). No apparent difference was noted between bone resorption in the proximal and distal aspects of the third molar in both men and women. These findings were the same in young adults without AP.

In adults with AP, bone resorption at the distal aspect of the second molar showed a significant difference (p < 0.0001 in men and women) between young and older adults, as well as at the proximal aspect of the third molar (p < 0.05). However, no apparent difference was noted between bone resorption at the proximal aspect of the third molar in young and older women. There were no differences in bone resorption at the distal aspect of the third molar between young and older adults (in both of men and women).

In adults without AP, bone resorption at the distal aspect of the second molar between young and older adults showed significant difference (p < 0.01 in men and women). There was no difference in bone resorption at the proximal aspect of the third molar between young and older adults. No difference was seen in bone resorption at the distal aspect of the third molar between young and older adults.

Moreover, SD in these data in older adults was larger than that in young individuals.

Discussion

The present study included patients who had acute inflammation in the mesio-angular, incompletely impacted, mandibular third molars, and those without a history of acute inflammation, as assessed by a questionnaire. A remarkable increase in the mean depth of bone resorption was seen in incompletely impacted third molars at the points of A, B, and C in older adults with AP, unlike in young adults, except in the proximal aspect of the third molar in young women. Older adults without AP showed significant bone resorption at point A compared to young adults (p < 0.01), and there were no differences at B and C. There seems to be not much difference compared to participants with AP. Thus, increased radiolucency in individuals of middle or advanced age renders bone sensitive to infection. This is supported by the finding that T cells may regulate bone loss during chronic inflammation, as noted by Rifas and colleagues.13 Bone resorption, which seems to be an etiological factor leading to the emergence of current AP, is likely to be accelerated as a pronounced effect with aging, whereas there is a threshold age of 25 years for improvement of the alveolar bone level, as shown by Kugelberg6 and Blakey and colleagues.2 Rapid progression of infection can be followed by absence of resistance due to loss of periodontal membrane around the crown of incompletely impacted third molars. These indicate that bone defects could allow pathogenic infection through the bone surfaces and/or reduce periodontal tissue defense. On the contrary, steady-state bone may maintain an anti-inflammatory state in older adults without AP, and resistance to AP could be demonstrated by the level of bone resorption. Thus, bone resorption might be a factor for the prediction of risk of the emergence of AP in older adults, if pre-existing bone resorption due to chronic inflammation could effect a rise of AP. Indeed, age-related decrease of bone of mandible20,21 has been well-known as a physiological consequence of aging, and Cao and colleagues22 have shown that aging significantly increases stromal/osteoblastic cell-induced osteoclastogenesis, promotes expansion of the osteoclast precursor pool and alters the relationship between osteoblasts and osteoclasts in cancellous bone. However, the value of these findings for prediction of risk of acute inflammation is limited. Bone resorption could be a response to AP, since AP contributes to not only the decrease in bone formation but also aggressive bone resorption. Il-123,24 and tumor necrosis factor,23 cytosolic phospholipase A2-α,25 prostaglandin E2 (PGE2),26 cytokine signaling-1 and -3,27 PGE synthases,28 and Th129 have been viewed to promote severe bone resorption. Further studies are necessary to assess the effect of AP on bone resorption.

The significant increase of bone resorption at all of the distal aspects of the second molar (A), and the proximal (B) and the distal (C) aspects of the third molar in older adults with AP compared with older adults without AP suggest a threshold for an increase of AP in A, B, and C; with A having the most important association with an increase of AP. No differences were seen at B between young and older women with AP, and at C between young and older adults with AP. An increased bone resorption at A in older adults without AP was seen compared to young adults without AP (p < 0.01 in both men and women), which seems to show no significant difference between them, whereas, there were no differences regarding B in older and young adults without AP, and regarding point C in older and young adults without AP. These suggest that the effects of aging could be appended to a threshold for a rise of AP in A in the older adults. Vertical bone resorption seen in A could be characterized by aging as shown in alveolar bone resorption of periodontitis, whereas ventro-dorsal directional bone resorption seen in B and C could not be influenced by aging. Naturally, bone resorption in the mandible could not develop along the tooth axis but vertically with aging. Thus, the elderly might be expected to develop AP and bone resorption when compared to young adults. Various factors might define a threshold for the development of AP as a consequence of aging, since the elderly have latent instability of physiological capacity, and decreased protection from pathogens due to low immunological and neutrophil functions.

It was also found that bone resorption at the proximal and distal aspects of the third molar with AP in the older adults showed a larger SD than bone resorption in young adults and bone resorption without AP, indicating a substantial proportion of the marked inter-individual variation in the mean depth of bone resorption in older adults with AP. This finding indicates that responses to chronic pericoronitis could be viewed as an inter-individual variability in immuno-inflammatory mechanism, biological aging as well as the individual’s medical history. This variation seems to be similar to the perceptions of pain in the elderly. Wide individual variation including other clinical correlations and genetic associations should be studied regarding the development of AP in the elderly, incorporating a longitudinal design to determine the prerequisites for AP.

Furthermore, the reasons for the significant increase of bone resorption at the proximal aspect (B) in young women with AP than without AP was unclear, although estrogen may exert its bone-sparing effects on periodontal tissues by altering the expression of inflammatory cytokines in human periodontal ligament cells.30 This finding may be the likely result of a temporal phenomenon seen in the young against stimuli of acute inflammation, or due to a statistical problem of a small sample.

In conclusion, bone resorption was not related to acute pericoronitis in young individuals but related in older adults. Incompletely impacted third molars with significant bone resorption should point to acute inflammation in the elderly, since AP might be associated with bone resorption.