Literature DB >> 23674790

Penetrating diaphragmatic injury: accuracy of 64-section multidetector CT with trajectography.

David Dreizin1, Maria J Borja, Gary H Danton, Kevin Kadakia, Kim Caban, Luis A Rivas, Felipe Munera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To (a) determine the diagnostic performance of 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) trajectography for penetrating diaphragmatic injury (PDI), (b) determine the diagnostic performance of classic signs of diaphragmatic injury at 64-section multidetector CT, and (c) compare the performance of these signs with that of trajectography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study had institutional review board approval, with a waiver of the informed consent requirement. All patients who had experienced penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma, who had undergone preoperative 64-section multidetector CT of the chest and abdomen, and who had surgical confirmation of findings during a 2.5-year period were included in this study (25 male patients, two female patients; mean age, 32.6 years). After a training session, four trauma radiologists unaware of the surgical outcome independently reviewed all CT studies and scored the probability of PDI on a six-point scale. Collar sign, dependent viscera sign, herniation, contiguous injury on both sides of the diaphragm, discontinuous diaphragm sign, and transdiaphragmatic trajectory were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). Accuracies were determined and receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sensitivities for detection of PDI by using 64-section multidetector CT with postprocessing software ranged from 73% to 100%, specificities ranged from 50% to 92%, NPVs ranged from 71% to 100%, PPVs ranged from 68% to 92%, and accuracies ranged from 70% to 89%. Discontinuous diaphragm, herniation, collar, and dependent viscera signs were highly specific (92%-100%) but nonsensitive (0%-60%). Contiguous injury was generally more sensitive (80%-93% vs 73%-100%) but less specific (50%-67% vs 83%-92%) than transdiaphragmatic trajectory when patients with multiple entry wounds were included in the analysis. Transdiaphragmatic trajectory was a much more sensitive sign of PDI than previously reported (73%-100% vs 36%), with NPVs ranging from 71% to 100% and PPVs ranging from 85% to 92%.
CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-section multidetector CT trajectography facilitates the identification of transdiaphragmatic trajectory, which accurately rules in PDI when identified. Contiguous injury remains a highly sensitive sign, even when patients with multiple injuries are considered, and is useful for excluding PDI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23674790     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Damage control surgery: use of diagnostic CT after life-saving laparotomy.

Authors:  Armonde A Baghdanian; Arthur H Baghdanian; Maria Khalid; Anthony Armetta; Christina A LeBedis; Stephan W Anderson; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-11

2.  MDCT of complications and common postoperative findings following penetrating torso trauma.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Uttam K Bodanapally; Felipe Munera
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27

3.  An international survey to assess use of oral and rectal contrast in CT protocols for penetrating torso trauma.

Authors:  Cory J Ozimok; Vincent M Mellnick; Michael N Patlas
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-10-21

Review 4.  Evolving concepts in MDCT diagnosis of penetrating diaphragmatic injury.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Peter J Bergquist; Anil T Taner; Uttam K Bodanapally; Nikki Tirada; Felipe Munera
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-07-22

Review 5.  Diaphragmatic injuries: why do we struggle to detect them?

Authors:  Michael N Patlas; Vincent A Leung; Luigia Romano; Nicola Gagliardi; Gianluca Ponticiello; Mariano Scaglione
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: epidemiology, associated injuries, and outcome-an analysis based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.

Authors:  Carsten Weber; Arnulf Willms; Dan Bieler; Christof Schreyer; Rolf Lefering; Sebastian Schaaf; Robert Schwab; Erwin Kollig; Christoph Güsgen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Computed tomography of blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic injury: sensitivity and inter-observer agreement of CT Signs.

Authors:  Mark M Hammer; Eric Flagg; Vincent M Mellnick; Kristopher W Cummings; Sanjeev Bhalla; Constantine A Raptis
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-19

8.  CT of Penetrating Abdominopelvic Trauma.

Authors:  Muhammad Naeem; Mark J Hoegger; Frank W Petraglia; David H Ballard; Maria Zulfiqar; Michael N Patlas; Constantine Raptis; Vincent M Mellnick
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Diagnosis of diaphragm injuries using modern 256-slice CT scanners: too early to abandon operative exploration.

Authors:  Rindi Uhlich; Jeffrey David Kerby; Patrick Bosarge; Parker Hu
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-11-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.