Literature DB >> 23674781

Application of basic principles of physics to head and neck MR angiography: troubleshooting for artifacts.

Shilpa Pandey1, Michael Hakky, Ellie Kwak, Hernan Jara, Carl A Geyer, Sami H Erbay.   

Abstract

Neurovascular imaging studies are routinely used for the assessment of headaches and changes in mental status, stroke workup, and evaluation of the arteriovenous structures of the head and neck. These imaging studies are being performed with greater frequency as the aging population continues to increase. Magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic imaging techniques are helpful in this setting. However, mastering these techniques requires an in-depth understanding of the basic principles of physics, complex flow patterns, and the correlation of MR angiographic findings with conventional MR imaging findings. More than one imaging technique may be used to solve difficult cases, with each technique contributing unique information. Unfortunately, incorporating findings obtained with multiple imaging modalities may add to the diagnostic challenge. To ensure diagnostic accuracy, it is essential that the radiologist carefully evaluate the details provided by these modalities in light of basic physics principles, the fundamentals of various imaging techniques, and common neurovascular imaging pitfalls. ©RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23674781     DOI: 10.1148/rg.333125148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  A vascular cause of neck pain.

Authors:  Brian Reed Curtis; Evan Fitchett
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Fractional Flow on TOF-MRA as a Measure of Stroke Risk in Children with Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.

Authors:  A Y Ibrahim; A Amirabadi; M M Shroff; N Dlamini; P Dirks; P Muthusami
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition in subtraction-based magnetic resonance angiography to assess saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Qing Fu; Ding-Xi Liu; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Xian-Bo Deng; Chuan-Sheng Zheng
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Visualization of basilar artery atherosclerotic plaques by conventional T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: A case-control study.

Authors:  Mi Ji Lee; Soohyun Cho; Jihoon Cha; Seonwoo Kim; Sung Tae Kim; Oh Young Bang; Chin-Sang Chung; Kwang Ho Lee; Gyeong-Moon Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Pearls and Pitfalls in the Magnetic Resonance Diagnosis of Dural Sinus Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Guide for the Trainee Radiologist.

Authors:  Vivek Pai; Iram Khan; Yih Yian Sitoh; Bela Purohit
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-11-28

6.  Data fusion and 3D visualization for optimized representation of neurovascular relationships in the posterior fossa.

Authors:  Peter Hastreiter; Barbara Bischoff; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Arnd Doerfler; Michael Buchfelder; Ramin Naraghi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  3D-Visualization of Neurovascular Compression at the Ventrolateral Medulla in Patients with Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Panagiota Manava; Ramin Naraghi; Roland Schmieder; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Arnd Doerfler; Michael M Lell; Michael Buchfelder; Peter Hastreiter
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Hyperintense Thyroid Incidentaloma on Time of Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Authors:  Soo Chin Kim; Inseon Ryoo; Hye Young Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.