Literature DB >> 23674485

0.5 Mb array as a first-line prenatal cytogenetic test in cases without ultrasound abnormalities and its implementation in clinical practice.

Malgorzata I Srebniak1, Lisanne Mout, Diane Van Opstal, Robert-Jan H Galjaard.   

Abstract

Using whole-genome array testing instead of karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis for all indications may be desirable because of the higher diagnostic yield and shorter reporting time. The goal of this research was finding the optimal array resolution that could replace routine prenatal karyotyping in cases without ultrasound abnormalities, for example, referred for advanced maternal age or abnormal first trimester screening. As variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS), if reported, might complicate decision-making about continuation of pregnancy, such an optimal array resolution should have a high abnormality detection rate and reveal a minimal amount of VOUS. The array data of 465 fetuses were retrospectively evaluated with several resolution levels, and the Decipher microdeletion/microduplication syndrome list was reviewed to assess what could be theoretically missed with a lower resolution. A 0.5-Mb resolution showed a high diagnostic yield potential and significantly minimized the number of VOUS. Based on our experience, we recommend genomic SNP array as a first-tier test in prenatal diagnosis. The resolution should be chosen based on the indication. In cases of fetal ultrasound abnormalities or intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), high-resolution analysis should be done. In other cases, we advise replacing karyotyping by SNP array analysis with 0.5 Mb resolution.
© 2013 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VOUS; abnormal first trimester screening cytogenetic test; advanced maternal age; prenatal array testing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23674485     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  8 in total

1.  Offering a choice between NIPT and invasive PND in prenatal genetic counseling: the impact of clinician characteristics on patients' test uptake.

Authors:  Sanne L van der Steen; Diewertje Houtman; Iris M Bakkeren; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Marike G Polak; Jan J Busschbach; Aad Tibben; Sam R Riedijk
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Chromosomal Microarrays in Prenatal Diagnosis: Time for a Change of Policy?

Authors:  Peter Miny; Friedel Wenzel; Sevgi Tercanli; Isabel Filges
Journal:  Microarrays (Basel)       Date:  2013-12-05

3.  Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Olav B Petersen; Eric Smith; Diane Van Opstal; Marike Polak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Karin E M Diderich; Caterina M Bilardo; Lidia R Arends; Ida Vogel; Malgorzata I Srebniak
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Is prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis with genomic array indicated in pregnancies at risk for a molecular or metabolic disorder?

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Karin E M Diderich; Marieke Joosten; Femke A T de Vries; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Sam Riedijk; Karin E M Diderich; Sanne L van der Steen; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Femke A T de Vries; Diane van Opstal; Aad Tibben; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Walker-Warburg Syndrome Using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array: A Clinical Experience from Three Related Palestinian Families with Congenital Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Iman S Abumansour; Eman Al Sulmi; Bernard N Chodirker; Jennifer C Hunt
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-04-27

7.  The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents' Experiences.

Authors:  S L van der Steen; S R Riedijk; J Verhagen-Visser; L C P Govaerts; M I Srebniak; D Van Opstal; M Joosten; M F C M Knapen; A Tibben; K E M Diderich; R J H Galjaard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.