BACKGROUND: Studies of mechanisms mediating resistance to chemotherapy led to the discovery of the multidrug transporter ABCB1 (ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1), often expressed in leukemic cells of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Most clinical trials evaluating the strategy of inhibiting efflux-mediated chemotherapeutic resistance have been unsuccessful, clearly indicating the need for a better approach. METHODS: This study investigated the clinical relevance of 380 genes whose expression has been shown to affect the response to chemotherapy, mostly through in vitro studies, in 11 paired samples obtained at AML diagnosis and at relapse. The expression profiling of these 380 genes was performed using TaqMan-based quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Patients had a median age of 58 years at diagnosis, a median duration of complete remission of 284.5 days, and a median overall survival of 563 days. Cytogenetic abnormalities were detected at diagnosis in 4 patients, whereas 5 displayed a normal karyotype and 2 were not investigated. RESULTS: Hierarchical clustering shows that samples taken at diagnosis and relapse clustered in pairs for 6 patients of the 11 studied, suggesting recurrence of the same leukemic blast, whereas for the other 5 patients, the data indicate their relapse blasts arose from different origins. A patient-by-patient analysis of the paired samples led to the striking observation that each had a unique gene signature representing different mechanisms of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The data underline the need for personalized molecular analysis to tailor treatment for patients with AML.
BACKGROUND: Studies of mechanisms mediating resistance to chemotherapy led to the discovery of the multidrug transporter ABCB1 (ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1), often expressed in leukemic cells of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Most clinical trials evaluating the strategy of inhibiting efflux-mediated chemotherapeutic resistance have been unsuccessful, clearly indicating the need for a better approach. METHODS: This study investigated the clinical relevance of 380 genes whose expression has been shown to affect the response to chemotherapy, mostly through in vitro studies, in 11 paired samples obtained at AML diagnosis and at relapse. The expression profiling of these 380 genes was performed using TaqMan-based quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Patients had a median age of 58 years at diagnosis, a median duration of complete remission of 284.5 days, and a median overall survival of 563 days. Cytogenetic abnormalities were detected at diagnosis in 4 patients, whereas 5 displayed a normal karyotype and 2 were not investigated. RESULTS: Hierarchical clustering shows that samples taken at diagnosis and relapse clustered in pairs for 6 patients of the 11 studied, suggesting recurrence of the same leukemic blast, whereas for the other 5 patients, the data indicate their relapse blasts arose from different origins. A patient-by-patient analysis of the paired samples led to the striking observation that each had a unique gene signature representing different mechanisms of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The data underline the need for personalized molecular analysis to tailor treatment for patients with AML.
Authors: Brian C Shaffer; Jean-Pierre Gillet; Chirayu Patel; Maria R Baer; Susan E Bates; Michael M Gottesman Journal: Drug Resist Updat Date: 2012-03-11 Impact factor: 18.500
Authors: Matthew J Walter; Dong Shen; Li Ding; Jin Shao; Daniel C Koboldt; Ken Chen; David E Larson; Michael D McLellan; David Dooling; Rachel Abbott; Robert Fulton; Vincent Magrini; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki-Veizer; Michelle O'Laughlin; Xian Fan; Marcus Grillot; Sarah Witowski; Sharon Heath; John L Frater; William Eades; Michael Tomasson; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Daniel C Link; Elaine R Mardis; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Timothy A Graubert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: C Wuchter; K Leonid; V Ruppert; M Schrappe; T Büchner; C Schoch; T Haferlach; J Harbott; R Ratei; B Dörken; W D Ludwig Journal: Haematologica Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Torsten Haferlach; Alexander Kohlmann; Lothar Wieczorek; Giuseppe Basso; Geertruy Te Kronnie; Marie-Christine Béné; John De Vos; Jesus M Hernández; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Ken I Mills; Amanda Gilkes; Sabina Chiaretti; Sheila A Shurtleff; Thomas J Kipps; Laura Z Rassenti; Allen E Yeoh; Peter R Papenhausen; Wei-Min Liu; P Mickey Williams; Robin Foà Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea N Robinson; Bethelihem G Tebase; Sonia C Francone; Lyn M Huff; Hanna Kozlowski; Dominique Cossari; Jung-Min Lee; Dominic Esposito; Robert W Robey; Michael M Gottesman Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Kaycee B Moshofsky; Hyun J Cho; Guanming Wu; Kyle A Romine; Matthew T Newman; Yoko Kosaka; Shannon K McWeeney; Evan F Lind Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-10-22
Authors: Karin Klauke; Mathilde J C Broekhuis; Ellen Weersing; Albertina Dethmers-Ausema; Martha Ritsema; Marta Vilà González; Erik Zwart; Leonid V Bystrykh; Gerald de Haan Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 7.765