Literature DB >> 23674218

Coracoclavicular ligament attachment regions of the Chinese population: a quantitative anatomic study.

Cheng Xue1, Li-Jun Song, Ming Zhang, Tian-Sheng Zheng, Jia-Hu Fang, Xiang Li.   

Abstract

It is reported that the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments arise at a constant region, which is proportional to the size of the clavicle and the coracoid process. However, all cadavers in those studies were from whites or African-Americans. The aim of this study was to evaluate dimension and orientation of CC footprints in Chinese cadavers and to determine whether race-dependent differences in these measurements exist. A total of 172 shoulders from 87 Chinese cadavers were used in this study, and the CC ligaments including the coracoid and the lateral clavicle were exposed. After measurement of the length of the CC ligaments, the ligaments were dissected and the insertion sites as well as the footprint centers were identified and marked. Each CC insertion dimension and its distance to the bony landmarks were recorded. Ratios representing the distance from the clavicular landmarks to each footprint center divided by clavicular length and clavicular width were calculated. These ratios were calculated for the coracoid process as well. The mean length of the clavicle and the coracoid process was 139.9 ± 9.4 and 40.5 ± 4.0 mm. The distance from the lateral edge of the clavicle to the conoidal center and to the trapezoidal center was 35.7 ± 3.4 and 21.8 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The distance from the tip of the coracoid to the conoidal center and to the trapezoidal center was 35.1 ± 3.2 and 29.7 ± 2.9 mm, respectively. The ratios of the distance to the conoidal center and to the trapezoidal center divided by clavicular length and coracoidal length were 25.5, 15.6, 86.8 and 73.4 %, respectively. While absolute differences in the origin of the CC ligaments exist between different races, the ratio of these origins to the size of the clavicle and the coracoid process is constant.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23674218     DOI: 10.1007/s12565-013-0179-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Int        ISSN: 1447-073X            Impact factor:   1.741


  9 in total

1.  Two large processes at the acromial end of a clavicle: a case report.

Authors:  T Totlis; G Paparoidamis; G Sofidis; K Natsis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyra A Benavent; Dafang Zhang; Elizabeth G Matzkin; Brandon E Earp
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-10

3.  Midterm results of coracoclavicular stabilization with double augmentation for acute acromioclavicular dislocation.

Authors:  Sungwook Choi; Tong-Joo Lee; Myung-Ku Kim; Ji Eun Park; Hyunseong Kang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-22

4.  Predictors of safety margin for coracoid transfer: a cadaveric morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Terufumi Shibata; Teruaki Izaki; Satoshi Miyake; Nobunao Doi; Yasuhara Arashiro; Yozo Shibata; Yutaka Irie; Katsuro Tachibana; Takuaki Yamamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Anteroinferior bundle of the acromioclavicular ligament plays a substantial role in the joint function during shoulder elevation and horizontal adduction: a finite element model.

Authors:  Ausberto Velasquez Garcia; Farid Salamé Castillo; Max Ekdahl Giordani; Joaquin Mura Mardones
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Qualitative and Quantitative Anatomic Descriptions of the Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligaments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liam A Peebles; Zachary S Aman; Matthew J Kraeutler; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-14

7.  Computed Tomography-Based Determination of the Optimal Locations of Bone Tunnels for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Lujing Xiong; Xin Zhou; Bingkun Li; Xiaogao Tang; Guo-You Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Biomechanical Comparison of Fracture Risk Created by 2 Different Clavicle Tunnel Preparations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael S Nuzzo; Gregory J Adamson; Thay Q Lee; Michelle H McGarry; Lisa Husak
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-05

9.  Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for the Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Daisuke Mori; Fumiharu Yamashita; Kazuha Kizaki; Noboru Funakoshi; Yasuyuki Mizuno; Masahiko Kobayashi
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2017-08-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.