Literature DB >> 23674008

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of standard-dose and low-dose pediatric head computed tomography: a retrospective study assessing the effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.

Koray Kilic1, Gonca Erbas, Melike Guryildirim, Oznur Leman Konus, Mehmet Arac, Erhan Ilgit, Sedat Isik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on pediatric head computed tomography (CT) examinations.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 305 pediatric head CT examinations. The study population consisted of standard dose (STD, n = 152) examinations reconstructed with filtered back projection and low dose (LD, n = 153) examinations reconstructed with 30% (LD30) and 0% (LD0) ASIR. We compared groups by means of radiation dose, noise measures, and visual grading. Student t test, 1-way analysis of variance test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The dose in the LD30 group was significantly lower (29%) than that in the STD group (P < 0.001). The noise in the white matter (P < 0.001), SNR (P < 0.001), and subjective image noise (P = 0.044) was significantly better in the STD group than those in the LD30 group. There was no significant difference between LD30 and STD groups in the sharpness (P = 0.141), diagnostic acceptability (P = 0.079), and artifacts (P = 0.750) and contrast-to-noise ratio (P = 0.718).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we found that a blend of 30% ASIR in a 16-slice multidetector CT produces diagnostically acceptable pediatric head CT examinations with a 29% less dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23674008     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828426de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality, and Image-Reconstruction Times.

Authors:  R N Southard; D M E Bardo; M H Temkit; M A Thorkelson; R A Augustyn; C A Martinot
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Pediatric head computed tomography with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction: focus on image quality and reduction of radiation dose.

Authors:  Hyun-Hae Cho; So Mi Lee; Sun Kyoung You
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-19

3.  Radiation dose reduction using 100-kVp and a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm in adolescent head CT: Impact on grey-white matter contrast and image noise.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Takeshi Nakaura; Akinori Tsuji; Joji Urata; Mitsuhiro Furusawa; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirarta; Masafumi Kidoh; Seitaro Oda; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Can use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduce radiation dose in unenhanced head CT? An analysis of qualitative and quantitative image quality.

Authors:  Bjørn Helge Østerås; Kristin Livelten Heggen; Hans Kristian Pedersen; Hilde Kjernlie Andersen; Anne Catrine T Martinsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2016-08-17

5.  The Impact of Iterative Reconstruction on Computed Tomography Radiation Dosimetry: Evaluation in a Routine Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Rachael E Moorin; David A J Gibson; Rene K Forsyth; Richard Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Benefits of Low-Dose CT Scan of Head for Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Dan Wu; Gang Wang; Bingyang Bian; Zhuohang Liu; Dan Li
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.658

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.