Literature DB >> 23673055

Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.

Katya Tentori1, Vincenzo Crupi.   

Abstract

We agree with Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) that formal tools can be fruitfully employed to model human judgment under uncertainty, including well-known departures from principles of classical probability. However, existing findings either contradict P&B's quantum probability approach or support it to a limited extent. The conjunction fallacy serves as a key illustration of both kinds of problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23673055     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  4 in total

1.  From is to ought, and back: how normative concerns foster progress in reasoning research.

Authors:  Vincenzo Crupi; Vittorio Girotto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-13

Review 2.  The Bayesian boom: good thing or bad?

Authors:  Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-08

3.  Is experiential-intuitive cognitive style more inclined to err on conjunction fallacy than analytical-rational cognitive style?

Authors:  Yong Lu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-06

4.  The Conjunction and Disjunction Fallacies: Explanations of the Linda Problem by the Equate-to-Differentiate Model.

Authors:  Yong Lu
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2016-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.