OBJECTIVE: To evaluate subclinical macular findings in premature patients at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with the use of handheld spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine prematurely born neonates. METHODS: Forty-nine infants were imaged using a handheld SD-OCT. Images were acquired in nonsedated infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Some patients were followed and reimaged over the course of several weeks. A total of 300 total images were acquired and evaluated for cystoid macular edema (CME) and persistence of inner retinal layers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In vivo determination of foveal retinal lamination, image analysis, and clinical observation. RESULTS: A total of 241 (80%) of the images from 46 patients were usable (defined as having scans passing through the fovea with clearly identifiable retinal layers). Persistence of 1 or more inner retinal layers was seen in 43 of the patients with usable images (93%). Of the patients with at least 1 persistent layer, 17, 4, 8, 12, and 1, had a maximum ROP stage of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4A, respectively. Cystoid macular edema was seen in 25 of the 46 patients (54%) during 1 or more imaging sessions. Cystoid macular edema was present in 9, 1, 5, 9, and 1 patient with maximum ROP stage of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4A, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest there is persistence of inner retinal layers in premature infants regardless of maximal ROP stage. Subclinical CME is seen in premature infants; however, CME does not appear to be correlated with ROP stage. This suggests that there may be other causes for the CME seen in this patient population. Hand-held SD-OCT imaging is a viable technique for evaluating subclinical macular findings in premature infants, although larger datasets are needed from multiple centers to further evaluate the generalizability of these findings. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate subclinical macular findings in premature patients at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with the use of handheld spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine prematurely born neonates. METHODS: Forty-nine infants were imaged using a handheld SD-OCT. Images were acquired in nonsedated infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Some patients were followed and reimaged over the course of several weeks. A total of 300 total images were acquired and evaluated for cystoid macular edema (CME) and persistence of inner retinal layers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In vivo determination of foveal retinal lamination, image analysis, and clinical observation. RESULTS: A total of 241 (80%) of the images from 46 patients were usable (defined as having scans passing through the fovea with clearly identifiable retinal layers). Persistence of 1 or more inner retinal layers was seen in 43 of the patients with usable images (93%). Of the patients with at least 1 persistent layer, 17, 4, 8, 12, and 1, had a maximum ROP stage of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4A, respectively. Cystoid macular edema was seen in 25 of the 46 patients (54%) during 1 or more imaging sessions. Cystoid macular edema was present in 9, 1, 5, 9, and 1 patient with maximum ROP stage of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4A, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest there is persistence of inner retinal layers in premature infants regardless of maximal ROP stage. Subclinical CME is seen in premature infants; however, CME does not appear to be correlated with ROP stage. This suggests that there may be other causes for the CME seen in this patient population. Hand-held SD-OCT imaging is a viable technique for evaluating subclinical macular findings in premature infants, although larger datasets are needed from multiple centers to further evaluate the generalizability of these findings. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Authors: José Carlos Rivera; Przemyslaw Sapieha; Jean-Sébastien Joyal; François Duhamel; Zhuo Shao; Nicholas Sitaras; Emilie Picard; Ellen Zhou; Pierre Lachapelle; Sylvain Chemtob Journal: Neonatology Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Daniel X Hammer; Nicusor V Iftimia; R Daniel Ferguson; Chad E Bigelow; Teoman E Ustun; Amber M Barnaby; Anne B Fulton Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David L J Epstein; Peep V Algvere; Gunvor von Wendt; Stefan Seregard; Anders Kvanta Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ramiro S Maldonado; Rachelle V O'Connell; Neeru Sarin; Sharon F Freedman; David K Wallace; C Michael Cotten; Katrina P Winter; Sandra Stinnett; Stephanie J Chiu; Joseph A Izatt; Sina Farsiu; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Sai H Chavala; Sina Farsiu; Ramiro Maldonado; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Xi Chen; Shwetha Mangalesh; Alexandria Dandridge; Du Tran-Viet; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-03-21
Authors: Adam L Rothman; Du Tran-Viet; Lejla Vajzovic; Vincent Tai; Neeru Sarin; Sandra Holgado; Kathryn E Gustafson; C Michael Cotten; Sharon F Freedman; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Retina Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Adam L Rothman; Du Tran-Viet; Kathryn E Gustafson; Ricki F Goldstein; Maureen G Maguire; Vincent Tai; Neeru Sarin; Amy Y Tong; Jiayan Huang; Laura Kupper; C Michael Cotten; Sharon F Freedman; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 12.079