Literature DB >> 23672501

Temporal dynamics of direct reciprocal and indirect effects in a host-parasite network.

Shai Pilosof1, Miguel A Fortuna, Maxim V Vinarski, Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya, Boris R Krasnov.   

Abstract

1. Temporal variation in the direct and indirect influence that hosts and parasites exert on each other is still poorly understood. However, variation in species' influence due to species and interactions turnover can have important consequences for host community dynamics and/or for parasite transmission dynamics, and eventually for the risk of zoonotic diseases. 2. We used data on a network of small mammals and their ectoparasites surveyed over 6 years to test hypotheses exploring (i) the temporal variability in direct and indirect influences species exert on each other in a community, and (ii) the differences in temporal variability of direct/indirect influences between temporally persistent (TP) and temporally intermittent species. 3. We modelled the temporal variation in (i) direct reciprocal influence between hosts and parasites (hosts providing resources to parasites and parasites exploiting the resources of hosts), using an asymmetry index, and (ii) indirect influence among species within a community (e.g. facilitation of parasite infestation by other parasites), using betweenness centrality. We also correlated asymmetry and centrality to examine the relationship between them. 4. Network dynamics was determined by TP species but even those species had strong among-species heterogeneity in the temporal variation of the direct/indirect effects they exerted. In addition, there was a significant positive linear correlation between asymmetry and centrality. 5. We conclude that the temporal dynamics of host-parasite interactions is driven by TP hosts. However, even within this group of persistent species, some exhibit large temporal variation, such that the functional roles they play (e.g. in promoting parasite transmission) change over time. In addition, parasites having a large negative impact on hosts are also those facilitating the spread of other parasites through the entire host community. Our results provide new insights into community dynamics and can be applied in the management of antagonistic networks aimed at preventing disease outbreaks.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antagonistic interactions; antagonistic networks; community ecology; disease ecology; ecological networks; fleas; generalized least‐squares models; host–parasite interactions; mites; network analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23672501     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  4 in total

1.  Potential parasite transmission in multi-host networks based on parasite sharing.

Authors:  Shai Pilosof; Serge Morand; Boris R Krasnov; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Top-down network analysis characterizes hidden termite-termite interactions.

Authors:  Colin Campbell; Laura Russo; Alessandra Marins; Og DeSouza; Karsten Schönrogge; David Mortensen; John Tooker; Réka Albert; Katriona Shea
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Parasite spread at the domestic animal - wildlife interface: anthropogenic habitat use, phylogeny and body mass drive risk of cat and dog flea (Ctenocephalides spp.) infestation in wild mammals.

Authors:  Nicholas J Clark; Jennifer M Seddon; Jan Šlapeta; Konstans Wells
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Urbanization-induced habitat fragmentation erodes multiple components of temporal diversity in a Southern California native bee assemblage.

Authors:  Keng-Lou James Hung; John S Ascher; David A Holway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.