Saurabh Pratap Singh1, Naresh Kumar Tripathy, Soniya Nityanand. 1. Saurabh Pratap Singh, Naresh Kumar Tripathy, Soniya Nityanand, Stem Cell Research Facility, Department of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the phenotypic and neural differentiation potential of human bone marrow derived multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPC) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). METHODS: Cultures of MAPC and MSC were established in parallel from same samples of human bone marrow (n = 5). Both stem cell types were evaluated for expression of pluripotency markers including Oct-4 and Nanog by immunocytochemistry and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and expression of standard mesenchymal markers including CD14, CD34, CD44, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105 and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-ABC by flow cytometry. After treatment with neural induction medium both MAPC and MSC were evaluated for expression of neural proteins [neuronal filament-200 (NF-200) and glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP)] by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting and neural genes [NF-200, GFAP, Tau, microtubule-associated protein (MAP)-1B, MAP-2, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and oligodendrocyte-1 (Olig-1)] by quantitative real-time-PCR. RESULTS: MAPC had small trigonal shaped while MSC had elongated spindle-shaped morphology. The MAPC expressed Oct-4 and Nanog both at gene and protein levels, whereas MSC were negative for these pluripotent markers. MAPC were negative for HLA-ABC while MSC had high expression of HLA-ABC. In addition, MAPC as compared to MSC had significantly lower expression of CD44 (36.56% ± 1.92% vs 98.23% ± 0.51%), CD73 (15.11% ± 2.24% vs 98.53% ± 2.22%) and CD105 (13.81% ± 3.82% vs 95.12% ± 5.65%) (P < 0.001, for all) MAPC cultures compared to MSC cultures treated with neural induction medium had significantly higher fold change expression of NF-200 (0.64), GFAP (0.52), Tau (0.59), MAP-2 (0.72), Olig-1 (0.18) and NSE (0.29) proteins (P < 0.01 for Olig-1 and P < 0.001 for rest) as well as higher fold change expression of genes of NF-200 (1.34), GFAP (1.12), Tau (1.08), MAP-1B (0.92), MAP-2 (1.14) and NSE (0.4) (P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: MAPC can be differentially characterized from MSC as Oct-4 and Nanog positive stem cells with no expression of HLA-ABC and low expression of mesenchymal markers CD44, CD73 and CD105 and when compared to MSC they possess greater predilection for differentiation into neuro-ectodermal lineage.
AIM: To compare the phenotypic and neural differentiation potential of human bone marrow derived multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPC) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). METHODS: Cultures of MAPC and MSC were established in parallel from same samples of human bone marrow (n = 5). Both stem cell types were evaluated for expression of pluripotency markers including Oct-4 and Nanog by immunocytochemistry and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and expression of standard mesenchymal markers including CD14, CD34, CD44, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105 and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-ABC by flow cytometry. After treatment with neural induction medium both MAPC and MSC were evaluated for expression of neural proteins [neuronal filament-200 (NF-200) and glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP)] by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting and neural genes [NF-200, GFAP, Tau, microtubule-associated protein (MAP)-1B, MAP-2, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and oligodendrocyte-1 (Olig-1)] by quantitative real-time-PCR. RESULTS:MAPC had small trigonal shaped while MSC had elongated spindle-shaped morphology. The MAPC expressed Oct-4 and Nanog both at gene and protein levels, whereas MSC were negative for these pluripotent markers. MAPC were negative for HLA-ABC while MSC had high expression of HLA-ABC. In addition, MAPC as compared to MSC had significantly lower expression of CD44 (36.56% ± 1.92% vs 98.23% ± 0.51%), CD73 (15.11% ± 2.24% vs 98.53% ± 2.22%) and CD105 (13.81% ± 3.82% vs 95.12% ± 5.65%) (P < 0.001, for all) MAPC cultures compared to MSC cultures treated with neural induction medium had significantly higher fold change expression of NF-200 (0.64), GFAP (0.52), Tau (0.59), MAP-2 (0.72), Olig-1 (0.18) and NSE (0.29) proteins (P < 0.01 for Olig-1 and P < 0.001 for rest) as well as higher fold change expression of genes of NF-200 (1.34), GFAP (1.12), Tau (1.08), MAP-1B (0.92), MAP-2 (1.14) and NSE (0.4) (P < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION:MAPC can be differentially characterized from MSC as Oct-4 and Nanog positive stem cells with no expression of HLA-ABC and low expression of mesenchymal markers CD44, CD73 and CD105 and when compared to MSC they possess greater predilection for differentiation into neuro-ectodermal lineage.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone marrow; Human mesenchymal; Human multipotent adult progenitor cells; Neural differentiation; Phenotypic markers; Stem cells
Authors: Enrico Pierantozzi; Barbara Gava; Ivana Manini; Franco Roviello; Giuseppe Marotta; Mario Chiavarelli; Vincenzo Sorrentino Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Selim Kuçi; Zyrafete Kuçi; Hatixhe Latifi-Pupovci; Dietrich Niethammer; Rupert Handgretinger; Michael Schumm; Gernot Bruchelt; Peter Bader; Thomas Klingebiel Journal: Curr Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Ignacio García-Gómez; Gema Elvira; Agustín G Zapata; María L Lamana; Manuel Ramírez; Javier García Castro; Mariano García Arranz; Angeles Vicente; Juan Bueren; Damián García-Olmo Journal: Expert Opin Biol Ther Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Xabier L Aranguren; Aernout Luttun; Carlos Clavel; Cristina Moreno; Gloria Abizanda; Miguel A Barajas; Beatriz Pelacho; Maialen Uriz; Miriam Araña; Ana Echavarri; Mario Soriano; Enrique J Andreu; Juana Merino; Jose Manuel Garcia-Verdugo; Catherine M Verfaillie; Felipe Prósper Journal: Blood Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: C M Cabrera; A Nieto; J L Cortes; R M Montes; P Catalina; F Cobo; A Barroso-Del-Jesus; A Concha Journal: Cell Biol Int Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jin Young Jeong; Sekar Suresh; Mi Jang; Mi Na Park; Kuppannan Gobianand; Seungkwon You; Sung-Heom Yeon; Hyun-Jeong Lee Journal: Cell Biol Int Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.612