Literature DB >> 23671490

The incidence of prostate cancer and urothelial cancer in the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens in a tertiary care Canadian centre.

Sri Sivalingam1, Darrel Drachenberg.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystoprostatectomy remains the gold standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer. However, given the treatment related complications of compromised potency and continence with this procedure, prostate/sexuality sparing cystectomy in orthotopic neobladder candidates has emerged in an effort to minimize these quality of life concerns. Recent evidence suggests only a marginal functional benefit from these technical refinements. We sought to determine the incidence of occult prostate cancer and urothelial cancer of the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens conducted for muscle invasive bladder cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 83 male patients who underwent radical cystoprostatectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer between April 2004 and March 2007. The median age of our study group was 71 years. Pathologic findings of prostate/urothelial cancer in the prostate were identified. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as Gleason score >6, tumour volume >0.5cc, extracapsular extension or perineural invasion.
RESULTS: Our review yielded a 30% (±10%, 0.95 CI) rate of prostate cancer, with 19% (± 8.5%, 0.95 CI) of total specimens being positive for clinically significant prostate cancer. Urothelial cancer in the prostate was identified in 16% (±8.5%, 0.95 CI) of patients, with an overlap with prostate cancer in 2 patients. The overall rate of an underlying cancer within the prostate of our cystoprostatectomy specimens was about 46% (±10.7%, 0.95 CI).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the oncological risk of leaving behind residual cancer may not justify the practice of prostate-sparing cystectomies.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23671490      PMCID: PMC3650820          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  22 in total

1.  Is incidentally detected prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy clinically significant?

Authors:  Roberta Mazzucchelli; Francesca Barbisan; Marina Scarpelli; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Liang Cheng; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Concomitant pathology in the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens: a prospective study and review.

Authors:  Mohamed Saad; Mona Abdel-Rahim; Hassan Abol-Enein; Mohammed A Ghoneim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Developing selection criteria for prostate-sparing cystectomy: a review of cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Kyle A Richards; Graham E Parks; Gopal H Badlani; A Karim Kader; Ashok K Hemal; Joseph A Pettus
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Pathology of the prostate in radical cystectomy specimens: a critical review.

Authors:  Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Rocco Damiano; Gianluca Giannarini; Marco De Sio; Liang Cheng; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Cystectomy with prostate sparing for bladder cancer in 100 patients: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Guy Vallancien; Hazem Abou El Fettouh; Xavier Cathelineau; Herve Baumert; Gaelle Fromont; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Oncological evaluation of prostate sparing cystectomy: the Montsouris long-term results.

Authors:  François Rozet; Guillaume Lesur; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Gordon Smyth; Shawn Soon; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Current status of prostate-sparing cystectomy.

Authors:  John C Kefer; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Prostate-sparing cystectomy: long-term oncological results.

Authors:  Remco R de Vries; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; Harm van Tinteren; Jorg R Oddens; Otto Visser; Henk G van der Poel; Axel Bex; Willem Meinhardt; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Optimal timing of radical cystectomy for patients with T1 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup.

Authors:  R E Hautmann; R de Petriconi; H W Gottfried; K Kleinschmidt; R Mattes; T Paiss
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Left behind: The potential problem of residual cancer.

Authors:  Bobby Shayegan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Preoperative findings, pathological stage PSA recurrence in men with prostate cancer incidentally detected at radical cystectomy: our experience in 242 cases.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Filippo Fraggetta; Antonio Galia; Paolo Panella; Michele Pennisi; Maurizio Colecchia; Francesco Aragona
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Detection of Incidental Prostate Cancer or Urothelial Carcinoma Extension in Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients by Using Multiparametric MRI: A Retrospective Study Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.0.

Authors:  Sang Eun Yoon; Byung Chul Kang; Hyun-Hae Cho; Sanghui Park
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Incidental prostate cancer at the time of cystectomy: the incidence and clinicopathological features in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Jiahua Pan; Wei Xue; Jianjun Sha; Hu Yang; Fan Xu; Hanqing Xuan; Dong Li; Yiran Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.