| Literature DB >> 23671449 |
Hualin Ma1, Xianggui Zhang, Xinzhou Zhang, Dan Yang, Lingguo Meng, Yi Zhang, Shuyan Zhou.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: EsA was reported to have the effect of modulating immune response, cell proliferation and apoptosis as well as anti-inflammatory effects in acute and chronic experimental models. However, the effects of EsA on LN remain poorly understood. To investigate the roles of EsA in LN, the effects of EsA were tested on BXSB mice, a SLE model, in which male SB/Le mice and female C57BL/6 mice were hybridized through recombinant inbred species.Entities:
Keywords: BXSB mice; apoptosis; cytokine; esculentoside A; proliferation
Year: 2012 PMID: 23671449 PMCID: PMC3648817 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2012.31439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Laboratory parameters in each group
| Parameter | Control group | Dexamethasone-treated group | EsA-treated group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-treatment urine protein [mg/l] | 752.79 ±64.29 | 761.57 ±66.84 | 742.4 ±49.63 |
| Post-treatment urine protein [mg/l] | 1071.25 ±134.09 | 726.76 ±109.05 | 773.75 ±128.80 |
| Creatinine [µmol/l] | 52.76 ±10.56 | 40.53 ±8.94 | 36.54 ±6.73 |
| BUN [mmol/l] | 9.69 ±1.58 | 7.04 ±1.29 | 7.73 ±1.45 |
| Post-treatment urine protein/urine creatinine [mg/g] | 14.13 ±4.96 | 10.77 ±4.49 | 10.54 ±3.72 |
Values presented as mean ± SEM.
Value of p < 0.05 vs. control group
Comparison of TNF-α and IL-6 concentration in each group
| Group |
| TNF-α [pg/ml] | IL-6 [pg/ml] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 8 | 144.36 ±13.49 | 43.44 ±7.62 |
| Dexamethasone-treated group | 8 | 119.68 ±12.95 | 20.06 ±6.45 |
| EsA-treated group | 8 | 115.67 ±13.48 | 21.70 ±6.56 |
Values presented as mean ± SEM.
Value of p < 0.05 vs. control group
Figure 1HE staining showed that the mesangial cell proliferation and mesangial matrix decreased and capillary opened in the dexamethasone-treated group and EsA-treated group (A-C). TUNEL positive cells (yellow particles in the nucleus) were apparent in glomerular cells and tubular epithelial cells (D-I). Magnification: 400×
Apoptosis index of renal cells in each group
| Group | Fields ( | Glomerular cells apoptosis index [%] | Tubular cells apoptosis index [%] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 60 | 14.34 ±2.66 | 27.35 ±4.44 |
| Dexamethasone-treated group | 60 | 22.82 ±4.29 | 35.81 ±5.71 |
| EsA-treated group | 60 | 29.42 ±3.94 | 43.62 ±6.48 |
Values presented as mean ± SEM.
Value of p < 0.05 vs. control group
p < 0.05 vs. dexamethasone-treated group
Figure 2Fas and FasL were expressed in each group. The number of positive cells (brown granules in the cytoplasm) in glomerular and renal interstitium of the dexamethasone-treated group and EsA-treated group was higher than that in the control group (A-F). PCNA mRNA was expressed in each group. The number of positive cells (brown granules in the cytoplasm) in glomerular and renal interstitium of the dexamethasone-treated group and EsA-treated group was lower than that in the control group (G-I). Caspase-3 mRNA was expressed in each group. The number of positive cells (brown granules in the cytoplasm) in glomerular and renal interstitium of the dexamethasone-treated group and EsAtreated group was higher than that in the control group (J-L). Magnification: 400×
Comparison of mean optical density values of Fas, FasL, PCNA-mRNA and caspase-3 mRNA in each group
| Group | Fields ( | Fas | FasL | PCNA-mRNA | Caspase-3 mRNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 60 | 0.215 ±0.010 | 0.196 ±0.013 | 0.363 ±0.025 | 0.200 ±0.038 |
| Dexamethasone-treated group | 60 | 0.253 ±0.012 | 0.257 ±0.021 | 0.241 ±0.075 | 0.265 ±0.024 |
| EsA-treated group | 60 | 0.271 ±0.023 | 0.277 ±0.016 | 0.216 ±0.015 | 0.282 ±0.017 |
Values presented as mean ±SEM.
p < 0.05 vs. control group