Literature DB >> 23670997

The spontaneous fluctuation of the excitability of a single node modulates the internodes connectivity: a TMS-EEG study.

Federica Giambattistelli1, Leo Tomasevic, Giovanni Pellegrino, Camillo Porcaro, Jean Marc Melgari, Paolo Maria Rossini, Franca Tecchio.   

Abstract

Brain effective connectivity can be tracked by cerebral recruitments evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as measured by simultaneous electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). When TMS is targeting the primary motor area, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) can be collected from the "target" muscles. The aim of this study was to measure whether or not effective brain connectivity changes with the excitability level of the corticospinal motor pathway (CSMP) as parameterized by MEP amplitude. After averaging two subgroups of EEG-evoked responses corresponding to high and low MEP amplitudes, we calculated the individual differences between them and submitted the grand average to sLORETA algorithm obtaining localized regions of interest (RoIs). Statistical differences of RoI recruitment strength between low and high CSMP excitation was assessed in single subjects. Preceding the feedback arrival, neural recruitment for stronger CSMP activation were weaker at 6-10 ms of homotopic sensorimotor areas BA3/4/5 of the right nonstimulated hemisphere (trend), weaker at 18-25 ms of left parietal BA2/3/40, and stronger at 26-32 ms of bilateral frontal motor areas BA6/8. The proposed method enables the tracking of brain network connectivity during stimulation of one node by measuring the strength of the connected recruited node activations. Spontaneous increases of the excitation of the node originating the transmission within the hand control network gave rise to dynamic recruitment patterns with opposite behaviors, weaker in homotopic and parietal circuits, stronger in frontal ones. The effective connectivity within bilateral circuits orchestrating hand control appeared dynamically modulated in time even in resting state as probed by TMS.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral connectivity as localized cortical recruitment; spontaneous fluctuation of excitability; transcranial magnetic stimulation simultaneous to electroencephalographic recordings

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670997      PMCID: PMC6869066          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  61 in total

Review 1.  Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans.

Authors:  S Kähkönen; S Komssi; J Wilenius; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study.

Authors:  C Bonato; C Miniussi; P M Rossini
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Variability in the amplitude of skeletal muscle responses to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man.

Authors:  P H Ellaway; N J Davey; D W Maskill; S R Rawlinson; H S Lewis; N P Anissimova
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04

5.  Clinical evaluation of conduction time measurements in central motor pathways using magnetic stimulation of human brain.

Authors:  A T Barker; I L Freeston; R Jabinous; J A Jarratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tanja Kassuba; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Effects of ovarian hormones on human cortical excitability.

Authors:  Mark J Smith; Linda F Adams; Peter J Schmidt; David R Rubinow; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Central motor tract propagation in man: studies with non-invasive, unifocal, scalp stimulation.

Authors:  P M Rossini; M Caramia; F Zarola
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  TMS-induced cortical potentiation during wakefulness locally increases slow wave activity during sleep.

Authors:  Reto Huber; Steve K Esser; Fabio Ferrarelli; Marcello Massimini; Michael J Peterson; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the sensory-motor regions inhibits gamma synchrony.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Giorgio Arcara; Giovanni Di Pino; Cristina Turco; Matteo Maran; Luca Weis; Francesco Piccione; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assessment of brain connectivity and networks.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; Riccardo Di Iorio; Paolo Maria Rossini; Jung E Park; Robert Chen; Pablo Celnik; Antonio P Strafella; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Pre-stimulus Alpha Oscillations and Inter-subject Variability of Motor Evoked Potentials in Single- and Paired-Pulse TMS Paradigms.

Authors:  Zafer Iscan; Maria Nazarova; Tommaso Fedele; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The spectral features of EEG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex depend on the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Matteo Fecchio; Andrea Pigorini; Angela Comanducci; Simone Sarasso; Silvia Casarotto; Isabella Premoli; Chiara-Camilla Derchi; Alice Mazza; Simone Russo; Federico Resta; Fabio Ferrarelli; Maurizio Mariotti; Ulf Ziemann; Marcello Massimini; Mario Rosanova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of corticospinal activity on TMS-evoked activity and connectivity in healthy subjects: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Petrichella; Nessa Johnson; Bin He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reshapes Resting-State Brain Networks: A Magnetoencephalography Assessment.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Matteo Maran; Cristina Turco; Luca Weis; Giovanni Di Pino; Francesco Piccione; Giorgio Arcara
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Tanguy Hedrich; Manuel Porras-Bettancourt; Jean-Marc Lina; Ümit Aydin; Jeffery Hall; Christophe Grova; Eliane Kobayashi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  How cerebral cortex protects itself from interictal spikes: The alpha/beta inhibition mechanism.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Tanguy Hedrich; Viviane Sziklas; Jean-Marc Lina; Christophe Grova; Eliane Kobayashi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Theta Activity in the Left Dorsal Premotor Cortex During Action Re-Evaluation and Motor Reprogramming.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Leo Tomasevic; Damian Marc Herz; Kit Melissa Larsen; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cortical gamma-synchrony measured with magnetoencephalography is a marker of clinical status and predicts clinical outcome in stroke survivors.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Giorgio Arcara; Anna Maria Cortese; Luca Weis; Silvia Di Tomasso; Gino Marioni; Stefano Masiero; Francesco Piccione
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.