Literature DB >> 23670849

Competition and quality in home health care markets.

Kyoungrae Jung1, Daniel Polsky.   

Abstract

Market-based solutions are often proposed to improve health care quality; yet evidence on the role of competition in quality in non-hospital settings is sparse. We examine the relationship between competition and quality in home health care. This market is different from other markets in that service delivery takes place in patients' homes, which implies low costs of market entry and exit for agencies. We use 6 years of panel data for Medicare beneficiaries during the early 2000s. We identify the competition effect from within-market variation in competition over time. We analyze three quality measures: functional improvements, the number of home health visits, and discharges without hospitalization. We find that the relationship between competition and home health quality is nonlinear and its pattern differs by quality measure. Competition has positive effects on functional improvements and the number of visits in most ranges, but in the most competitive markets, functional outcomes and the number of visits slightly drop. Competition has a negative effect on discharges without hospitalization that is strongest in the most competitive markets. This finding is different from prior research on hospital markets and suggests that market-specific environments should be considered in developing polices to promote competition.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competition; home health care markets; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670849      PMCID: PMC3858441          DOI: 10.1002/hec.2938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  15 in total

1.  The Medicare home health benefit implications of recent payment changes.

Authors:  C E Bishop; J Kerwin; S S Wallack
Journal:  Care Manag J       Date:  1999

2.  Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chou
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes.

Authors:  R A Hirth
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Home care.

Authors:  Sharon A Levine; Jeremy Boal; Peter A Boling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The use of Medicare home health care services.

Authors:  H G Welch; D E Wennberg; W P Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Medicare-certified home health services: national and regional supply in the 1980s.

Authors:  C C Scalzi; J S Zinn; M J Guilfoyle; S T Perdue
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The effect of financial pressure on the quality of care in hospitals.

Authors:  Yu-Chu Shen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Assessing competition in hospital care markets: the importance of accounting for quality differentiation.

Authors:  Abigail Tay
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2003
View more
  3 in total

1.  Market Competition and Health Outcomes in Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Yuanchao Zheng; Vivian Ho; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jay Bhattacharya; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Effect of Interdependences of Referral Behaviors on the Quality of Ambulatory Care: Evidence from Taiwan.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-11-20

3.  Entry regulation and the effect of public reporting: Evidence from Home Health Compare.

Authors:  Bingxiao Wu; Jeah Jung; Hyunjee Kim; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.046

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.