Literature DB >> 23669268

Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review.

Sarah F Barnett1, Ravi K Alagar, Michael P W Grocott, Savvas Giannaris, John R Dick, Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe.   

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is an important measure of the quality of health care and is used as an outcome measure in interventional and quality improvement studies. Previous studies have found that there are few appropriately developed and validated questionnaires available. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify all tools used to measure patient satisfaction with anesthesia, which have undergone a psychometric development and validation process, appraised the quality of these processes, and made recommendations of tools that may be suitable for use in different clinical and academic settings. There are a number of robustly developed and subsequently validated instruments, however, there are still many studies using nonvalidated instruments or poorly developed tools, claiming to accurately assess satisfaction with anesthesia. This can lead to biased and inaccurate results. Researchers in this field should be encouraged to use available validated tools, to ensure that patient satisfaction is measured and reported fairly and accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669268     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  19 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction survey scores are not an appropriate metric to differentiate performance among anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Gen Li; Brendan Grant; Paul St Jacques; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Matthew S Shotwell; Jonathan P Wanderer
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Patient satisfaction with divided anesthesia care.

Authors:  Kira-Lee Koster; Carolin Björklund; Sebastian Fenner; Wolfgang Johann Flierler; Michael Laupheimer; Katharina Burri; Matthias Nübling; Thomas Heidegger
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-08-29

3.  Development and validation of the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) for assessment of procedural sedation quality.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Bolanle Bukoye; Mandeep Sawhney; Tyler Berzin; Kenneth Sands; Sona Chowdary; Anita Shah; Sheila Barnett
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The impact of parental health mindset on postoperative recovery in children.

Authors:  Alexandra Kain; Claudia Mueller; Brenda J Golianu; Brooke N Jenkins; Michelle A Fortier
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.556

5.  Self-Reported, Structured Measures of Recovery to Detect Postoperative Morbidity.

Authors:  Aida Anetsberger; Manfred Blobner; Veronika Krautheim; Katrin Umgelter; Sebastian Schmid; Bettina Jungwirth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Design and methodology of SNAP-1: a Sprint National Anaesthesia Project to measure patient reported outcome after anaesthesia.

Authors:  Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe; Eleanor Mary Kate Walker; Madeline Bell
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-17

7.  Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Infusion for Procedural Comfort and Intraoperative Sedation in Patients Undergoing Surgeries with Subarachnoid Block: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dewan Roshan Singh; Kusha Nag; Amrutha Bindu Nagella; V R Hemanth Kumar; Antony John Charles
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

8.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on measurement to maintain and improve quality of enhanced recovery pathways for elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  S Ramani Moonesinghe; Michael P W Grocott; Elliott Bennett-Guerrero; Roberto Bergamaschi; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Thomas J Hopkins; Stuart McCluskey; Tong J Gan; Michael Monty G Mythen; Andrew D Shaw; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-17

9.  Regional anaesthesia is associated with less patient satisfaction compared to general anaesthesia following distal upper extremity surgery: a prospective double centred observational study.

Authors:  Wouter Droog; Sanne E Hoeks; G Peter van Aggelen; D-Yin Lin; J Henk Coert; Robert Jan Stolker; Eilish M Galvin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Investigating determinants for patient satisfaction in women receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daryl Jian An Tan; Rehena Sultana; Nian Lin Reena Han; Alex Tiong Heng Sia; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.