Literature DB >> 23669182

Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of hemodynamic instability following carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Brant W Ullery1, Derek P Nathan, Eric K Shang, Grace J Wang, Benjamin M Jackson, Erin H Murphy, Ronald M Fairman, Edward Y Woo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of hemodynamic instability (HI) following carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS).
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data on 257 CAS procedures performed in 245 patients from 2002 to 2011 at a single institution. The presence of periprocedural HI, as defined by hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg), and/or bradycardia (heart rate <60 beats per minute), was recorded. Clinically significant HI (CS-HI) was defined as periprocedural HI lasting greater than 1 hour in total duration. Logistic regression was used to analyze the role of multiple demographic, clinical, and procedural variables.
RESULTS: Mean age was 70.9 ± 9.9 years (67% male). HI occurred following 84% (n = 216) of procedures. The incidence of hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia was 54%, 31%, and 60%, respectively. Sixty-three percent of cases involved CS-HI. Recent stroke was an independent risk factor for the development of CS-HI (odds ratio, 5.24; confidence interval, 1.28-21.51; P = .02), whereas baseline chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was protective against CS-HI (odds ratio, 0.34; confidence interval, 0.15-0.80; P = .01). Patients with CS-HI were more likely to experience periprocedural stroke compared to other patients (8% vs 1%; P = .03). There were no significant differences in the incidence of mortality or other major complications between those with and without CS-HI.
CONCLUSIONS: HI represents a common occurrence following CAS. While the presence of periprocedural HI alone did not portend a worse clinical outcome, CS-HI was associated with increased risk of stroke. Expeditious intervention to prevent and manage CS-HI is of critical importance in order to minimize adverse clinical events following CAS.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669182     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Fatal delayed hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  George Joseph; Varsha Kiron; Bobby John
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-10-29

2.  Complications and Predictors of Hypotension Requiring Vasopressor after Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Masataka Nanto; Yudai Goto; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Seisuke Tanigawa; Hayato Takeuchi; Yoshikazu Nakahara; Hiroshi Tenjin; Michiko Takado
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 3.  Predictors of Perioperative Stroke/Death after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Review Article.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-25

4.  Incidence and predictive factors associated with hemodynamic instability among adult surgical patients in the post-anesthesia care unit, 2021: A prospective follow up study.

Authors:  Melkam Mulugeta Abebe; Nurhusen Riskey Arefayne; Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen; Biruk Adie Admass
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Hemodynamic depression after carotid surgery: Incidence, risk factors and outcomes.

Authors:  Lauro A C Bogniotti; Marcelo P Teivelis; Francisco A M Cardozo; Bruno Caramelli; Nelson Wolosker; Pedro Puech-Leão; Nelson De Luccia; Daniela Calderaro
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.898

Review 6.  Recommendations for carotid stenting in Korea.

Authors:  Hyuk Won Chang; Shang Hun Shin; Sang-Il Suh; Hae Woong Jeong; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2015-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.