Sebastien Crouzet1, Jean Yves Chapelon2, Olivier Rouvière3, Florence Mege-Lechevallier4, Marc Colombel5, Hélène Tonoli-Catez5, Xavier Martin5, Albert Gelet6. 1. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France; Inserm, U1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: sebastien.crouzet@chu-lyon.fr. 2. Inserm, U1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. 3. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Radiology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France. 4. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pathology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France. 5. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France. 6. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France; Inserm, U1032, LabTau, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a nonsurgical therapy for selected patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: The long-term oncologic and morbidity outcomes of primary HIFU therapy for localized PCa were evaluated in a prospective, single-arm, single-institution cohort study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were patients treated with HIFU for localized PCa from 1997 to 2009. Excluded were patients with local recurrence following radiotherapy. A second HIFU session was systematically performed in patients with biopsy-proven local recurrence. INTERVENTION: Whole-gland prostate ablation with transrectal HIFU. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Incontinence was assessed using the Ingelman-Sundberg score, and potency was assessed using the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores. Primary outcomes were survival rates (biochemical-free, cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and overall survival). Secondary outcomes were morbidity rates. Median follow-up was 6.4 yr (range: 0.2-13.9). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival estimates, and multivariate analysis was used to determine predictive factors of biochemical progression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 1002 patients were included. The median nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 0.14 ng/ml, with 63% of patients reaching a nadir PSA ≤0.3 ng/ml. Sixty percent of patients received one HIFU session, 38% received two sessions, and 2% received three sessions. The 8-yr biochemical-free survival rates (Phoenix definition) were 76%, 63%, and 57% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively (p < 0.001). At 10 yr, the PCa-specific survival rate and metastasis-free survival rate (MFSR) were 97% and 94%, respectively. Salvage therapies included external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (13.8%), EBRT plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) (9.7%), and ADT alone (12.1%). Severe incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction decreased with refinement in the technology, from 6.4% and 34.9% to 3.1% and 5.9%, respectively. Limitations included the fact that the study was a single-arm study without a comparison group, technological improvements, changes in surgical protocol during the study, and the use of ADT to downsize the prostate in 39% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU is a potentially effective treatment of localized PCa, with a low PCa-specific mortality rate and a high MFSR at 10 yr as well as acceptable morbidity.
BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a nonsurgical therapy for selected patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: The long-term oncologic and morbidity outcomes of primary HIFU therapy for localized PCa were evaluated in a prospective, single-arm, single-institution cohort study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were patients treated with HIFU for localized PCa from 1997 to 2009. Excluded were patients with local recurrence following radiotherapy. A second HIFU session was systematically performed in patients with biopsy-proven local recurrence. INTERVENTION: Whole-gland prostate ablation with transrectal HIFU. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Incontinence was assessed using the Ingelman-Sundberg score, and potency was assessed using the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores. Primary outcomes were survival rates (biochemical-free, cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and overall survival). Secondary outcomes were morbidity rates. Median follow-up was 6.4 yr (range: 0.2-13.9). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival estimates, and multivariate analysis was used to determine predictive factors of biochemical progression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 1002 patients were included. The median nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 0.14 ng/ml, with 63% of patients reaching a nadir PSA ≤0.3 ng/ml. Sixty percent of patients received one HIFU session, 38% received two sessions, and 2% received three sessions. The 8-yr biochemical-free survival rates (Phoenix definition) were 76%, 63%, and 57% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively (p < 0.001). At 10 yr, the PCa-specific survival rate and metastasis-free survival rate (MFSR) were 97% and 94%, respectively. Salvage therapies included external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (13.8%), EBRT plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) (9.7%), and ADT alone (12.1%). Severe incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction decreased with refinement in the technology, from 6.4% and 34.9% to 3.1% and 5.9%, respectively. Limitations included the fact that the study was a single-arm study without a comparison group, technological improvements, changes in surgical protocol during the study, and the use of ADT to downsize the prostate in 39% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU is a potentially effective treatment of localized PCa, with a low PCa-specific mortality rate and a high MFSR at 10 yr as well as acceptable morbidity.
Authors: Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Tatiana D Khokhlova; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Bryan W Cunitz; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pavel B Rosnitskiy; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Adam D Maxwell; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 2.725