Literature DB >> 23668398

Comparison of p40 (ΔNp63) and p63 expression in prostate tissues--which one is the superior diagnostic marker for basal cells?

Verena Sailer1, Carsten Stephan, Nicolas Wernert, Sven Perner, Klaus Jung, Manfred Dietel, Glen Kristiansen.   

Abstract

AIMS: p63 is one of the standard markers for basal cells of the prostate gland. Recently, it has been suggested that the p63 isoform p40 might be more specific as a basal cell marker. In this study we compare the staining characteristics of p63 and p40 in normal and malignant prostate tissues. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A prostatectomy cohort (n = 640) in tissue microarray format was evaluated for p63 (clone 4A4) and for p40 (rabbit polyclonal) immunoreactivity in malignant and normal tissues. Immunoreactivity of basal and secretory cells was evaluated in a semiquantitative manner and compared case-wise. In normal tissues, p40 showed highly similar immunoreactivity compared to p63. The staining patterns were absolutely identical in 88% of cases. Additional cytoplasmic p40 staining in tumour cells occurred in 59.6% of cancer cases. Differences were seen in nuclear staining of carcinomas: 1.4% of carcinomas were p63-positive, whereas 0.6% were p40-positive.
CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, p40 stains prostatic basal cells as reliably as p63, with only minor differences. Aberrant staining of tumour cells is seen more rarely than with p63 (clone 4A4), establishing its higher specificity. However, additional cytoplasmic immunoreactivity narrows its eligibility for antibody cocktails (e.g. with alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase).
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23668398     DOI: 10.1111/his.12116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  7 in total

1.  Immunostaining of ∆Np63 (using the p40 antibody) is equal to that of p63 and CK5/6 in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Verena Sailer; Christine Lüders; Walther Kuhn; Volker Pelzer; Glen Kristiansen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  TAp63 and ΔNp63 (p40) in prostate adenocarcinomas: ΔNp63 associates with a basal-like cancer stem cell population but not with metastasis.

Authors:  Michaela Galoczova; Rudolf Nenutil; Zuzana Pokorna; Borivoj Vojtesek; Philip J Coates
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Loss of Sirt1 promotes prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, reduces mitophagy, and delays PARK2 translocation to mitochondria.

Authors:  Gabriele Di Sante; Timothy G Pestell; Mathew C Casimiro; Sara Bisetto; Michael J Powell; Michael P Lisanti; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Dennis M Bonal; Valentina Debattisti; Ke Chen; Liping Wang; Xiaohong He; Michael W McBurney; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  p40 as a Basal Cell Marker in the Diagnosis of Prostate Glandular Proliferations: A Comparative Immunohistochemical Study with 34betaE12.

Authors:  Hermann Brustmann
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2015-03-08

5.  Prognostic Significance and Functional Role of CEP57 in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Josef Mang; Nina Korzeniewski; Dimo Dietrich; Verena Sailer; Yanis Tolstov; Sam Searcy; Jost von Hardenberg; Sven Perner; Glen Kristiansen; Alexander Marx; Wilfried Roth; Esther Herpel; Carsten Grüllich; Valentin Popeneciu; Sascha Pahernik; Boris Hadaschik; Markus Hohenfellner; Stefan Duensing
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Evaluation of Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein D Expression as a Diagnostic Marker for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vikas Kumar; Moien Rasheed Lone; Anurag Kumar; Vinnyfred Vincent; Himani Thakkar; Deepika Mishra; Shyam S Chauhan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 7.  Glyoxalases in Urological Malignancies.

Authors:  Cinzia Antognelli; Vincenzo Nicola Talesa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.