| Literature DB >> 23668239 |
Johann G Zaller1, Myriam Parth, Ilona Szunyogh, Ines Semmelrock, Susanne Sochurek, Marcia Pinheiro, Thomas Frank, Thomas Drapela.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biodiversity loss and species invasions are among the most importantEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23668239 PMCID: PMC3656784 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-13-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Plant species composition (# of planted individuals in the community) of mesocosms with low (3 spp.) and high (12 spp.) plant diversity
| Grasses | | |
| 20 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| Forbs | | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| 20 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| Legumes | | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
| 20 | 5 | |
| 0 | 5 | |
Leaf length and number of tillers in response to earthworms (−Ew…no earthworms, +Ew…earthworm addition) and plant community composition (low diversity…3 spp.; high diversity…12 spp.)
| Maximum leaf length | | | | |
| 54.1 ± 4.1a | 54.5 ± 2.6a | 59.9 ± 1.3a | 57.8 ± 2.3a | |
| 6.4 ± 0.7b | 5.7 ± 0.6b | 7.5 ± 0.5a | 8.5 ± 0.4a | |
| 23.6 ± 1.3c | 20.2 ± 1.5c | 30.4 ± 1.2a | 27.4 ± 1.0b | |
| Number of tillers | | | | |
| 10.7 ± 1.1a | 11.6 ± 1.3a | 15.3 ± 2.2a | 11.7 ± 1.1a | |
| 6.1 ± 0.9b | 6.7 ± 0.8b | 9.6 ± 1.4a | 8.8 ± 0.8a | |
| 7.4 ± 0.6c | 6.1 ± 0.4b | 9.9 ± 1.0a | 8.5 ± 1.1a | |
Different letters after values refer to significant differences within a species (Tukey-Tests, p < 0.05). Means ± SE, n = 6.
ANOVA results for the effects of earthworms and plant community composition on plant growth, plant quality and slug herbivory
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |
| 0.030 | 0.863 | 2.307 | 0.130 | 0.056 | 0.813 | |
| 0.092 | 0.763 | 2.819 | 0.098 | 0.208 | 0.650 | |
| 0.048 | 0.828 | 2.438 | 0.124 | |||
| 0.028 | 0.866 | |||||
| 1.425 | 0.234 | 1.643 | 0.201 | |||
| 0.815 | 0.370 | 2.481 | 0.120 | 2.364 | 0.129 | |
| 0.014 | 0.906 | 0.507 | 0.479 | |||
| 2.700 | 0.105 | |||||
| 1.119 | 0.290 | 2.200 | 0.138 | |||
| 0.629 | 0.428 | 0.187 | 0.665 | 0.163 | 0.687 | |
| 0.009 | 0.926 | 0.006 | 0.936 | |||
| 3.375 | 0.073 | |||||
| Total shoot biomass | 2.511 | 0.120 | ||||
| Total root biomass | 2.770 | 0.103 | 1.281 | 0.264 | ||
| Total grass shoots | 0.344 | 0.560 | 2.302 | 0.136 | ||
| Total forb shoots | 2.744 | 0.105 | ||||
| Total legume shoots | 0.891 | 0.350 | 0.115 | 0.736 | 0.304 | 0.584 |
| | | | | | | |
| 0.096 | 0.758 | 0.114 | 0.736 | 0.004 | 0.949 | |
| 3.229 | 0.080 | 1.800 | 0.187 | 0.003 | 0.955 | |
| 0.001 | 0.988 | 0.018 | 0.893 | 0.010 | 0.922 | |
| 1.467 | 0.232 | 0.073 | 0.789 | 1.416 | 0.240 | |
| 0.215 | 0.643 | 0.159 | 0.691 | |||
| 0.127 | 0.723 | 0.056 | 0.814 | |||
| 2.070 | 0.160 | 0.098 | 0.756 | |||
| 0.121 | 0.730 | 3.394 | 0.072 | |||
| 0.232 | 0.631 | 0.045 | 0.833 | |||
| 0.001 | 0.985 | 0.095 | 0.756 | |||
| 0.360 | 0.553 | 1.484 | 0.232 | 0.073 | 0.789 | |
| 0.001 | 0.992 | 2.561 | 0.117 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| 0.406 | 0.531 | 2.075 | 0.165 | 0.002 | 0.965 | |
| 0.006 | 0.939 | 0.028 | 0.869 | |||
| 0.138 | 0.714 | 0.138 | 0.714 | |||
| 0.754 | 0.395 | 0.087 | 0.771 | |||
| 2.621 | 0.121 | 1.555 | 0.227 | |||
| 0.754 | 0.387 | 3.432 | 0.066 | |||
| 0.374 | 0.543 | 1.750 | 0.191 | |||
| 0.606 | 0.440 | 0.010 | 0.922 | |||
P-values after sequential Bonferroni corrrections.
Figure 1Biomass production of grasses, non-leguminous forbs and leguminous forbs in mesocosms planted with different community composition (low diversity - 3 spp.; high diversity - 12 spp.) without (−Ew) or with earthworms (+Ew). Only total roots are shown as they could not be assigned to certain functional groups. Different lower case letters denote significant differences among functional groups (Tukey, P < 0.05); different capital letters denote differences of total shoot mass. Means ± SE, n = 6.
Leaf C, N and C:N ratios in response to earthworms (−Ew…no earthworms, +Ew…earthworm addition) and plant community composition (low diversity…3 spp.; high diversity…12 spp.)
| Ctot | | | | |
| 41.6 ± 0.3a | 40.5 ± 0.4a | 40.8 ± 0.5a | 39.7 ± 1.0a | |
| 38.4 ± 1.0a | 38.5 ± 0.5a | 38.6 ± 0.1a | 38.5 ± 0.8a | |
| 40.9 ± 0.3a | 40.9 ± 0.3a | 40.6 ± 0.3a | 41.3 ± 0.4a | |
| Ntot | | | | |
| 2.9 ± 0.2b | 3.5 ± 0.3a | 2.8 ± 0.2b | 3.4 ± 0.3a | |
| 2.7 ± 0.1b | 3.1 ± 0.1a | 2.9 ± 0.1b | 3.4 ± 0.3a | |
| 3.0 ± 0.1ab | 3.1 ± 0.2ab | 2.8 ± 0.1c | 3.3 ± 0.1a | |
| C:N ratio | | | | |
| 15.9 ± 1.5a | 12.3 ± 1.1b | 15.3 ± 1.2a | 12.7 ± 1.3b | |
| 14.3 ± 0.7a | 12.8 ± 0.5b | 13.9 ± 0.6a | 11.5 ± 1.2b | |
| 13.9 ± 0.5a | 13.5 ± 0.4a | 14.7 ± 0.6a | 12.7 ± 0.5b | |
Different letters after values refer to significant differences within a species (Tukey-Tests, p < 0.05). Means ± SE, n = 6.
Figure 2Slug herbivory on the forb , the legume and to total plant community measured three days (uppermost graphs) and six days after slug introduction (middle graphs and bottom graphs). Different letters denote significant differences among treatments within each plant species (Tukey, P < 0.05). Means ± SE, n = 6.