Literature DB >> 23667846

Modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter medium for direct detection of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter strains in nasal and rectal swab samples.

Wonkeun Song1, Jacob Lee, Taek-Kyung Kim, Min-Jeong Park, Han-Sung Kim, Jae-Seok Kim.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether CHROMagar Acinetobacter medium (CHROMagar, France) in combination with an antimicrobial supplement (modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter; CHROMagar, France) can be used for detecting and isolating multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species (MRA) in nasal and rectal surveillance cultures. Nasal and rectal swab samples were collected from patients in an intensive care unit at a teaching hospital. The samples were used to inoculate modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter plates, which were examined after 24 and 48 hr of incubation at 37℃. Their susceptibility against the antimicrobial agents meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin was analyzed using the Etest (bioMerieux, France). A total of 406 paired samples (406 nasal swabs and 406 rectal swabs) were obtained from 226 patients, and 120 samples (28 nasal and 28 rectal cultures, 47 nasal cultures only, and 17 rectal cultures only) yielded MRA. Seventy-five MRA isolates (18.5%) were recovered from the 406 nasal samples, and 45 MRA isolates (11.1%) were recovered from the 406 rectal samples. Of the 120 MRA isolates, 3 (2.5%) were detected only after 48 hr of incubation. The use of modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter together with nasal and rectal swabs and 1-day incubation is an effective surveillance tool for detecting MRA colonization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter; Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.; Nasal swab; Rectal swab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23667846      PMCID: PMC3646194          DOI: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.3.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Lab Med        ISSN: 2234-3806            Impact factor:   3.464


Acinetobacter species has emerged as an important cause of healthcare-associated infections [1-3]. In many parts of the world, strains resistant to almost all available antimicrobial agents, including carbapenems, have been reported and implicated in numerous hospital outbreaks. These outbreaks usually occur in intensive care units (ICUs). Acinetobacter spp. are extremely difficult to eradicate from the environment [4-7]. Increased morbidity and mortality associated with these outbreaks have prompted some hospitals to begin active surveillance in high-risk patients to control the spread of Acinetobacter spp. [8]. CHROMagar Acinetobacter (CHROMagar, Paris, France) is a recently developed medium for selective and rapid identification of Acinetobacter spp. It contains agents that inhibit the growth of most yeasts and gram-positive cocci and uses a color-change method that permits identification of Acinetobacter spp. as red colonies within 18-24 hr of incubation. Previous studies have reported that CHROMagar Acinetobacter is highly sensitive (91.7%) and specific (89.7%) for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) [9]. Although CHROMagar Acinetobacter cannot distinguish carbapenem-resistant from carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii [10], it may be a useful medium for diagnostic screening and for improving strategies to control infections and limit the spread of MRAB. However, this requires improvement of the medium for better selection for MRAB [11]. The objective of this study was to analyze the performance of CHROMagar Acinetobacter modified by the addition of an antimicrobial supplement for the detection and isolation of MRA in nasal and rectal surveillance cultures. Modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter was prepared from dehydrated powder and liquid supplement added in the form of the antimicrobial selective supplement (CR 102; CHROMagar, Paris, France), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Nasal and rectal swab samples were collected from ICU patients as part of active surveillance screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, respectively. The samples were used to inoculate the modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter plates, which were then incubated at 37℃ and examined after 24 and 48 hr for oxidase-negative and bright salmon-red colonies indicative of MRA. Isolates identified as Acinetobacter spp. were tested using the Vitek 2 system (bioMerieux Vitek, Hazelwood, MO, USA) to confirm their identity. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were analyzed using Etest strips (bioMerieux, Marcy-I'Etoile, France) and interpreted on the basis of the current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [12]. Resistance of the Acinetobacter spp. isolates was tested against meropenem, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin, and multidrug resistance (MR) was defined as resistance against 3 or all of these antimicrobial agents. A total of 406 paired samples (406 nasal swabs and 406 rectal swabs) were obtained from 226 patients admitted to the medical and surgical ICUs at a teaching hospital in Korea during a 2-month study period (February-March 2012). A total of 120 samples (28 nasal and 28 rectal cultures, 47 nasal cultures only, 17 rectal cultures only) yielded MRA (Table 1). In a previous study that had assessed the MRA colonization rates of 3 body sites, including skin, pharynx, and digestive tract, the detection rates of Acinetobacter spp. were similar (75-77%) for armpit, pharynx, and rectum [13]. However, our findings demonstrated that the use of the nasal swab resulted in higher sensitivity (nasal, 18.5% vs. rectal, 11.1%) for the detection of MRA colonization than the rectal swab, and that a combination of nasal and rectal swabs increased the detection rates (22.7%) of MRA colonization. The identity of all 120 isolates as Acinetobacter spp., as diagnosed with the modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter medium, was confirmed using the Vitek 2 system (bioMerieux Vitek).
Table 1

Samples used and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of four antimicrobial drugs for 120 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter strains identified with modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter

Abbrebiations: R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible.

All the 120 Acinetobacter spp. isolates were confirmed to be MR by the Etest (Table 1). In another study that yielded similar results, addition of the KPC supplement (CHROMagar, Paris, France) to CHROMagar Acinetobacter enabled selective recovery of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii [14]. In the current study, 75 MRA isolates (18.5%) were recovered from 406 nasal samples, and 45 MRA isolates (11.1%) were recovered from 406 rectal samples (Table 1). Three (2.5%) of the 120 MRA isolates were detected only after 48 hr of incubation. Another 10 samples appeared as pinpoint-sized, colorless colonies at 24 hr that turned red at 48 hr. These 10 isolates tested oxidase positive and were identified as Pseudomonas spp. (data not shown). Therefore, extension of the incubation time does not improve the detection of MRA. The limitations of this study are that these evaluations were performed only in a clinical setting and in the absence of a comparable medium. However, these results show that the use of modified CHROMagar Acinetobacter together with nasal and rectal swabs and 1-day incubation is an effective active surveillance tool for the detection of MRA colonization.
  13 in total

1.  Multicity outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates producing the carbapenemase OXA-40.

Authors:  Karen Lolans; Thomas W Rice; L Silvia Munoz-Price; John P Quinn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Short-term effect of the application of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on different body site reservoir ICU patients colonized by multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  C Agustí; M Pujol; M J Argerich; J Ayats; M Badía; M A Domínguez; X Corbella; J Ariza
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Impact of imipenem resistance on mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteraemia.

Authors:  Ki Tae Kwon; Won Sup Oh; Jae-Hoon Song; Hyun-Ha Chang; Sook-In Jung; Shin-Woo Kim; Seong Yeol Ryu; Sang Taek Heo; Dong Sik Jung; Ji-Young Rhee; Sang Yop Shin; Kwan Soo Ko; Kyong Ran Peck; Nam Yong Lee
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Comparison of culture media for detection of Acinetobacter baumannii in surveillance cultures of critically-ill patients.

Authors:  A O Ajao; G Robinson; M S Lee; T D Ranke; R A Venezia; J P Furuno; A D Harris; J K Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Epidemiological significance of cutaneous, pharyngeal, and digestive tract colonization by multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii in ICU patients.

Authors:  J Ayats; X Corbella; C Ardanuy; M A Domínguez; A Ricart; J Ariza; R Martin; J Liñares
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  A nosocomial outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates expressing the carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinase OXA-58.

Authors:  Claire Héritier; Anne Dubouix; Laurent Poirel; Nicole Marty; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Bloodstream infection due to Acinetobacter spp: epidemiology, risk factors and impact of multi-drug resistance.

Authors:  D W Wareham; D C Bean; P Khanna; E M Hennessy; D Krahe; A Ely; M Millar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection mortality rate and length of hospitalization.

Authors:  Rebecca H Sunenshine; Marc-Oliver Wright; Lisa L Maragakis; Anthony D Harris; Xiaoyan Song; Joan Hebden; Sara E Cosgrove; Ashley Anderson; Jennifer Carnell; Daniel B Jernigan; David G Kleinbaum; Trish M Perl; Harold C Standiford; Arjun Srinivasan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Evaluation of CHROMagar Acinetobacter for detection of enteric carriage of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in samples from critically ill patients.

Authors:  N C Gordon; D W Wareham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carrying the carbapenemase OXA-23 in a German university medical centre.

Authors:  Anke Kohlenberg; Sophie Brümmer; Paul G Higgins; Dorit Sohr; Brar C Piening; Clemens de Grahl; Elke Halle; Henning Rüden; Harald Seifert
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Carbapenem-Resistant Non-Glucose-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli: the Missing Piece to the Puzzle.

Authors:  Thomas J Gniadek; Karen C Carroll; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  John D Perry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Clinically relevant pathogens on surfaces display differences in survival and transcriptomic response in relation to probiotic and traditional cleaning strategies.

Authors:  Jinglin Hu; Weitao Shuai; Jack T Sumner; Anahid A Moghadam; Erica M Hartmann
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 8.462

4.  Rapid identification of nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from a surgical intensive care unit in Egypt.

Authors:  Doaa Mohammad Ghaith; Reem Mostafa Hassan; Ahmed Mohamed Hasanin
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.526

5.  Risk factor for intestinal carriage of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and the impact on subsequent infection among patients in an intensive care unit: an observational study.

Authors:  Fu Qiao; Wenzhi Huang; Shan Gao; Lin Cai; Shichao Zhu; Li Wei; Yan Kang; Chuanmin Tao; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.