Literature DB >> 2366775

A dose-response analysis of ethylnitrosourea-induced recessive specific-locus mutations in treated spermatogonia of the mouse.

J Favor1, M Sund, A Neuhäuser-Klaus, U H Ehling.   

Abstract

A dose-response analysis was carried out with 2 independent data sets available for ethylnitrosourea-induced specific-locus mutations in spermatogonia of the mouse. It was assumed that the occurrence of mutation is binomially distributed and maximum-likelihood procedures were employed to determine the appropriateness of 4 alternative models, Linear, Linear-Quadratic, Power, and Threshold, in describing the dependence of the binomial parameter on dose. For both data sets, the Threshold model yielded a far superior fit and the threshold dose was estimated to be between 34 and 39 mg/kg. These results are supported by the relatively inefficient response of ethylnitrosourea at lower doses in inducing DNA adducts. Relevant specific-locus mutation results in the mouse for low-dose fractionated treatment as well as the recovery of mutation mosaics indicate the threshold model to be an oversimplification. Rather than a threshold dose below which 100% of the induced DNA adducts are repaired, we propose that some DNA adducts which may eventually be fixed as a mutation persist through a number of repair-competent cell divisions and do not interfere with normal cell function nor do they induce a repair response before being eventually fixed as a mutation. We interpret the thresholded response for ethylnitrosourea-induced specific-locus mutations to be due to a saturable repair process which at lower doses results in ethylnitrosourea being less efficient in inducing mutation. Once this repair process is saturated, a clear dose-related increase in the mutation rate is observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2366775     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(90)90175-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the genetic effects of equimolar doses of ENU and MNU: while the chemicals differ dramatically in their mutagenicity in stem-cell spermatogonia, both elicit very high mutation rates in differentiating spermatogonia.

Authors:  Liane B Russell; Patricia R Hunsicker; William L Russell
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Characterization of mutations induced by ethylnitrosourea in seminiferous tubule germ cells of transgenic B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  G S Provost; J M Short
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research.

Authors:  Anna M Wobus; Peter Löser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Carcinogens induce reversion of the mouse pink-eyed unstable mutation.

Authors:  R H Schiestl; J Aubrecht; F Khogali; N Carls
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Efficient recovery of ENU-induced mutations from the zebrafish germline.

Authors:  L Solnica-Krezel; A F Schier; W Driever
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Future research directions to study genetic damage in germ cells and estimate genetic risk.

Authors:  I D Adler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Unlocking the bottleneck in forward genetics using whole-genome sequencing and identity by descent to isolate causative mutations.

Authors:  Katherine R Bull; Andrew J Rimmer; Owen M Siggs; Lisa A Miosge; Carla M Roots; Anselm Enders; Edward M Bertram; Tanya L Crockford; Belinda Whittle; Paul K Potter; Michelle M Simon; Ann-Marie Mallon; Steve D M Brown; Bruce Beutler; Christopher C Goodnow; Gerton Lunter; Richard J Cornall
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Genetic effects from exposure to hazardous agents.

Authors:  J Favor
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.