Literature DB >> 23667698

FTY720/fingolimod, a sphingosine analogue, reduces amyloid-β production in neurons.

Nobumasa Takasugi1, Tomoki Sasaki, Ihori Ebinuma, Satoko Osawa, Hayato Isshiki, Koji Takeo, Taisuke Tomita, Takeshi Iwatsubo.   

Abstract

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a pluripotent lipophilic mediator working as a ligand for G-protein coupled S1P receptors (S1PR), which is currently highlighted as a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases including relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Sphingosine related compounds, FTY720 and KRP203 known as S1PR modulators, are phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2) to yield the active metabolites FTY720-P and KRP203-P, which work as functional antagonists for S1PRs. Here we report that FTY720 and KRP203 decreased production of Amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), a pathogenic proteins causative for Alzheimer disease (AD), in cultured neuronal cells. Pharmacological analyses suggested that the mechanism of FTY720-mediated Aβ decrease in cells was independent of known downstream signaling pathways of S1PRs. Unexpectedly, 6-days treatment of APP transgenic mice with FTY720 resulted in a decrease in Aβ40, but an increase in Aβ42 levels in brains. These results suggest that S1PR modulators are novel type of regulators for Aβ metabolisms that are active in vitro and in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23667698      PMCID: PMC3646787          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Bioactive lipids, such as sphingolipids, have effect on various neuronal activities, including signal transduction, inflammatory response, and neuronal survivals [1]. It has been reported that the sphingolipid metabolism in brain was altered under neurodegenerative conditions, e.g., Alzheimer disease (AD) [2], [3], [4]. However, the relationship between changes in brain sphingolipids with the pathological mechanisms of AD has remained largely unclear. Interestingly, the production of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, the major component of senile plaques deposited in the brains of patients with AD, is known to be modulated by sphingolipids [5]. Aβ is produced from amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) through a sequential cleavage by two aspartate proteases, β- and γ-secretases [6], [7]. BACE1 (β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1) [8] is a type-1 transmembrane protein responsible for the β-secretase activity, and γ-secretase is comprised of four integral membrane proteins, Presenilin (PS) as the catalytic subunit associated with Nicastrin (Nct), Aph1, and Pen2 [9]. Both enzymes are located in lipid rafts [10], a membrane microdomain enriched in sphingolipids and cholesterol, and the activities of the secretases are affected by the lipid composition [11], [12], [13]. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is produced from sphingosine by sphingosine kinase (SphK). S1P works as a ligand for a subset of G-protein coupled receptor (S1PR) proteins, and functions on various cellular events including neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune response [14]. S1PR modulator FTY720 (Fingolimod/Gilenya) is a sphingosine-related molecule exhibiting an immunomodulatory function, which has recently been approved as an oral treatment for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis [14], [15]. FTY720 is phosphorylated by SphK2 to function as an agonist for S1P receptors, i.e., S1PR1, S1PR3, S1PR4, and S1PR5 (Fig. 1) [16], [17], [18]. Despite its agonistic action, FTY720 promotes endocytosis and degradation of the S1P receptors, thereby resulting in functional antagonistic effects. FTY720 interferes with the neuroinflammatory responses of auto-active T-cells and glial cells [19] and ameliorates the symptoms of autoimmune encephalomyelitis in rodents, the latter being a model for multiple sclerosis [20], [21].
Figure 1

S1P receptor modulators, FTY720 and KRP203 decreased Aβ production from neuronal cells.

(A) The chemical structures of FTY720 and KRP203 and their phosphorylated forms. (B) Levels of Aβ secretion from mouse primary neurons after treatment with FTY720 or KRP203 for 24 hrs. The levels of secreted Aβ in conditioned media were quantified by ELISAs. For vehicle control, we used DMSO for FTY720 treatment and EtOH for KRP203 treatment, respectively. The percentages of the relative ratio to levels in vehicle control of each group (mean ± SEM) are indicated in the figures. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 by Student's t test. (n = 4). (C) Effects of FTY720 on cell viability in N2aNH cells. (D) Levels of Aβ secretion and Notch activity in N2aNH cells after treatment with FTY720 (n = 4, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). 10 µM of DAPT was used as a positive control. (E) Immunoblot analysis of NICD in FTY720-treated N2a cells, which was transiently transfected with cDNA encoding NΔE.

S1P receptor modulators, FTY720 and KRP203 decreased Aβ production from neuronal cells.

(A) The chemical structures of FTY720 and KRP203 and their phosphorylated forms. (B) Levels of Aβ secretion from mouse primary neurons after treatment with FTY720 or KRP203 for 24 hrs. The levels of secreted Aβ in conditioned media were quantified by ELISAs. For vehicle control, we used DMSO for FTY720 treatment and EtOH for KRP203 treatment, respectively. The percentages of the relative ratio to levels in vehicle control of each group (mean ± SEM) are indicated in the figures. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 by Student's t test. (n = 4). (C) Effects of FTY720 on cell viability in N2aNH cells. (D) Levels of Aβ secretion and Notch activity in N2aNH cells after treatment with FTY720 (n = 4, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). 10 µM of DAPT was used as a positive control. (E) Immunoblot analysis of NICD in FTY720-treated N2a cells, which was transiently transfected with cDNA encoding NΔE. Recently, we reported that SphK2, one of the rate limiting enzymes for the production of S1P, is upregulated in AD brains, and that S1P interacts with BACE1 to regulate its proteolytic activity [22]. To examine the effects of S1P receptor modulators on AD, we investigated the effects of FTY720, and another S1PR modulator KRP203 harboring a more specific agonist activity against S1PR1 [23], on Aβ production in cultured neuronal cells and brain Aβ levels in AD model mice.

Materials and Methods

Compounds

2-amino-2-[2-(4-octylphenyl)ethyl]-1,3-propanediol, hydrochloride (FTY720), 2-amino-2-[2-[2-chloro-4-[[3-(phenylmethoxy)phenyl]thio]phenyl]ethyl]-1,3-propanediol, hydrochloride (KRP203), 3-(2-(3-hexylphenylamino)-2-oxoethylamino) propanoic acid (W123), 5-[4-phenyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-thienyl]-3-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,2,4-oxadiazole (SEW2871) (Cayman chemicals), phosphorylated form of FTY720 (FTY720-P) (Echelon bioscience), and suramin (Sigma-Aldrich) were purchased from indicated venders. N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-(S)-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) was synthesized as previously described [24]. FTY720, W123, suramin and DAPT were dissolved in DMSO. KRP203 and FTY720-P was dissolved in ethanol and chloroform, respectively.

Antibodies and immunological methods

A polyclonal antibody against presnilin1 (PS1) CTF (G1L3) was raised as described [25]. Following antibodies were purchased from indicated venders: 82E1 (Immuno-Biological Laboratories) against the N terminus of human Aβ for detection of Aβ and βCTF, anti-APP (C) (Immuno-Biological Laboratories) for detection of APP CTFs and AICD, anti-mouse/rat APP (597) for detection of sAPPα, anti-sAPPβwt (Immuno-Biological Laboratories), anti-α-Tubulin DM1A (Sigma Aldrich), anti-SphK2 P-19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Myc 9B11 and anti-phospho specific ERK antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). Protein samples were analyzed by immunoblotting or two-site ELISAs for the detection of Aβ as previously described [26], [27]. Specificities of the APP antibodies used have previously been shown [22]. To analyze Aβ species with different C-terminal lengths, samples were separated by modified Tris/Tricine/8M urea gels as reported previously, followed by immunoblotting with 82E1 [28], [29].

Cell culture and transfection

Expression plasmids coding for human APP C-terminal 99 amino acid fragment (pcDNA3.1-SC100), Notch C-terminal fragment (pCS2-NΔE), human Sphingosine kinase 2 (pcDNA3.1-SphK2-V5) and an inactive mutant of SphK2 (G243D) were described previously [22], [26], [30], [31]. Plasmid transfection was performed using Lipofectamine2000 (Invitrogen). Stable mouse Neuro2a neuroblastoma cells line expressing recombinant Notch protein and luciferase reporter (N2aNH) was established by co-transfection with pcDNA3.1/Hygro-NΔE/gvp, pcDNA3-EGFP and pGL3(r2.2)-UAS [32], [33] followed by selection with G418 and hygromycin. After indicated time of treatment, medium and lysate were collected. To monitor the cell viability, we compared GFP fluorescence in each lysate with that of vehicle control samples. We further validated this viability assay using almarBlue assay (Invitrogen) (Figure S1). To monitor the Notch cleavage, luciferase assay was performed as described previously [29], [32], [33]. Primary cortical neurons were prepared from Balb/c mice at embryonic day 16, and grown in Neurobasal medium supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen) for 7 days [34], [35]. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes targeting the mouse Sphk2 sequence (target sequences: Sphk2: 5′-TAG GCC TGG CCT CGT TGC ATA-3′) as well as a negative control sequence were purchased from Qiagen. siRNA was reversely transfected in N2a cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Invitrogen) as previously described [22]. cDNAs encoding NΔE [30] and NΔEgv [36] were originally provided from Drs. Raphael Kopan and Jan Naslund, respectively.

FTY720 treatment in AD model mice

All experiments using animals in this study were performed according to the guidelines provided by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo. All animals were maintained on food and water with a 12 h light/dark cycle. A7 transgenic mice overexpressing human APP695 harboring K670N, M671L, and T714I FAD mutations in neurons under the control of Thy1.2 promoter were used as a mouse model of AD [37]. Female A7 mice at 6 months old were used for treatment of FTY720, in which FTY720 dissolved in saline was injected subcutaneously once a day for 6 days (0.5 mg/kg/day). Brain samples were solubilized with 10 mM Tris buffer containing 1% CHAPS, and subjected to the sandwich ELISA for Aβ (Wako Chemical) [22].

Results

S1P receptor modulators, FTY720 and KRP203, decreased Aβ production in neuronal cells

To test if the S1PR modulators alter Aβ production in neuronal cells, we treated mouse primary cortical neurons with FTY720 and KRP203 (structures shown in Figure 1A) and found that FTY720 and KRP203 decreased secretion of both Aβ40 and Aβ42 in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 1B). To further investigate the effect of these compounds, we tested a mouse neuronal N2a cell line stably expressing GFP, truncated Notch fused with Gal4/VP16 (NΔE/gvp) and a luciferase reporter under UAS promoter [32], [33], [36] (N2aNH cell line), which enables us to simultaneously analyze the effects of compounds on Aβ production, Notch signaling (as luciferase activity) and cell viability (as GFP fluorescence). Treatment with FTY720 decreased the production of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in a dose dependent fashion below the toxic concentration (Fig. 1C and S1) without affecting the Notch signaling (Fig. 1D and E). To further identify the molecular target of S1PR modulators, we analyzed their effect on N2a cells transiently expressing SC100, corresponding to βCTF of human APP that is a direct substrate of γ-secretase. SC100 is endoproteolyzed by γ-secretase at ε-site to release the intracellular domain (AICD), and resultant intramembrane stub is trimmed by carboxypeptidase-like activity of the γ-secretase at multiple γ-sites to generate Aβ. FTY720 and KRP203 decreased secretion of Aβ40 and Aβ42 from SC100 (Fig. 2A), suggesting that S1PR modulators affected the γ-secretase activity. Recently, small compounds that specifically lower Aβ42, and Aβ40 to a lesser extent, have been termed as γ-secretase modulators [6], [29]. However, FTY720 treatment decreased all Aβ species with different Aβ C-termini, including Aβ38, Aβ39, Aβ40 and Aβ42 (Fig. 2B). Concomitantly, a slight accumulation of αCTF (from endogenous mouse APP) and SC100 was observed (Fig. 2C–F), whereas the levels of sAPPα and sAPPβ products of α- or β-secretase-mediated APP cleavage of endogenous APP, respectively, were not altered by FTY720 treatment (Fig. 2G). Intriguingly, AICD production was not altered by FTY720 treatment (Fig. 2F) similarly to the processing of NΔE, a direct Notch substrate for γ-secretase (see Fig. 1D and E). Because both AICD and NICD are produced from ε-cleavage by γ-secretase, these data suggest that S1PR modulators specifically regulate the γ-cleavage irrespective of the substrate.
Figure 2

FTY720 decreased the γ-secretase-mediated cleavage of APP.

SC100 were transiently transfected in N2a cells. After 24 hrs transfection, cells were treated with FTY720 or KRP203 for 24 hrs. (A) Levels of secreted human Aβ detected by human Aβ-specific ELISA (n = 4, mean ± SEM **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). (B) Immunoblotting analysis of secreted human Aβ separated by modified Tris/Tricin/8M Urea gel system. (C) Immunoblot analysis of APP CTFs including overexpressed SC100 and endogenous PS1 in FTY720-treated cell lysates. Quantification analysis of (C) for βCTF (D), αCTF (E) and AICD (F) (n = 4, mean ± SEM *P<0.05). (G) Immunoblot analysis of endogenous sAPPα and sAPPβ in the conditioned media of N2a cells.

FTY720 decreased the γ-secretase-mediated cleavage of APP.

SC100 were transiently transfected in N2a cells. After 24 hrs transfection, cells were treated with FTY720 or KRP203 for 24 hrs. (A) Levels of secreted human Aβ detected by human Aβ-specific ELISA (n = 4, mean ± SEM **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). (B) Immunoblotting analysis of secreted human Aβ separated by modified Tris/Tricin/8M Urea gel system. (C) Immunoblot analysis of APP CTFs including overexpressed SC100 and endogenous PS1 in FTY720-treated cell lysates. Quantification analysis of (C) for βCTF (D), αCTF (E) and AICD (F) (n = 4, mean ± SEM *P<0.05). (G) Immunoblot analysis of endogenous sAPPα and sAPPβ in the conditioned media of N2a cells.

Mode of action of inhibition of Aβ production mediated by FTY720

Phosphorylation of FTY720 by SphK2 yields the active metabolite, FTY720-phosphate (FTY720-P), which is known as a potent agonist of the S1P receptors (Fig. 1A). To determine whether FTY720-P is involved in the regulation of Aβ production, we treated N2a cells with FTY720 after RNAi knock-down of the endogenous expression of SphK2. We observed a ∼60% of decrease in SphK2 expression after siRNA treatment (Fig 3A). As reported previously, knockdown of SphK2 decreased Aβ secretion [22]. However, additional decrease was not observed in FTY720-treated SphK2 knockdown cells, suggesting that SphK2 is required for lowering Aβ secretion by FTY720 (Fig. 3B). Next, we examined the effects of overexpression of SphK2 or its dominant negative mutant (G243D) in N2a cells. As reported previously, overexpression of SphK2 increased Aβ production [22] (Fig. 3C). Intriguingly, FTY720 treatment significantly decreased Aβ secretion from N2a cells that overexpress wild-type (WT) SphK2, but not dominant negative mutant, to levels lower than those of untransfected cells treated by FTY720. Quantitative comparison of the inhibitory effects of FTY720 revealed that an increase in SphK2 activity significantly sensitized N2a cells to the inhibitory effect of FTY720 on Aβ production (Fig. 3D). These data strongly suggest SphK2 activity is involved in the mechanism of action of FTY720 to lower Aβ production, raising the possibility that FTY720-P is the bona fide regulator of the γ-secretase activities.
Figure 3

SphK2 activity is required for FTY720 mediated decrease of Aβ secretion.

(A) N2a cells were transfected with siRNA against murine SphK2. After 48 hrs transfection of siRNA, levels of SphK2 was detected by immunoblotting (upper panel) and quantified (lower graph n = 3, mean ± SEM). (B) After 48 hrs transfection of siRNA, cells were treated with FTY720 for 24 hrs. Levels of secreted Aβ were quantified by ELISA (n = 3, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared with DMSO treatment or siRNA against SphK2 (indicated by line)). One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test for individual treatment differences was used for statistical analysis. (C, D) N2a cells were transiently transfected with LacZ, wild-type (WT) or dominant negative mutant (G243D) SphK2. After 24 hrs transfection, cells were treated with FTY720 for 24 hrs. (C) Levels of secreted Aβ (n = 4, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared with DMSO treatment or SphK2 (indicated by line)). (D) The inhibitory efficiency of FTY720 on Aβ secretion compared with DMSO treatment in each transfection of (C). Secreted Aβ levels of FTY720 were standardized by vehicle control in each group (mean ± SEM; **P<0.01).

SphK2 activity is required for FTY720 mediated decrease of Aβ secretion.

(A) N2a cells were transfected with siRNA against murine SphK2. After 48 hrs transfection of siRNA, levels of SphK2 was detected by immunoblotting (upper panel) and quantified (lower graph n = 3, mean ± SEM). (B) After 48 hrs transfection of siRNA, cells were treated with FTY720 for 24 hrs. Levels of secreted Aβ were quantified by ELISA (n = 3, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared with DMSO treatment or siRNA against SphK2 (indicated by line)). One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test for individual treatment differences was used for statistical analysis. (C, D) N2a cells were transiently transfected with LacZ, wild-type (WT) or dominant negative mutant (G243D) SphK2. After 24 hrs transfection, cells were treated with FTY720 for 24 hrs. (C) Levels of secreted Aβ (n = 4, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared with DMSO treatment or SphK2 (indicated by line)). (D) The inhibitory efficiency of FTY720 on Aβ secretion compared with DMSO treatment in each transfection of (C). Secreted Aβ levels of FTY720 were standardized by vehicle control in each group (mean ± SEM; **P<0.01). Phosphorylation of FTY720 by SphK takes place in the cytosol, and the resultant FTY720-P translocates to the extracellular side and acts as an agonist for S1PRs [38]. Next we examined whether known downstream signaling pathway of S1PRs was involved in the modulation of Aβ production. S1PR1, a major target of FTY720-P, is a Gi coupled receptor [39]. FTY720-P caused a significant phosphorylation of ERK1/2, a known downstream event of S1PR1-Gi signaling cascade (Fig. S2) in a similar fashion to that by SEW2871 [40]. Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 induced by SEW2871 was decreased by an authentic S1PR1 antagonist, W123 [41]. However, neither SEW2871 nor W123 affected the Aβ productions at indicated doses (Fig. S3). Then we tested co-treatment of W123 or suramin, the latter being known to work as a Gi protein inhibitor [42] together with FTY720. We found that both compounds failed to affect the decremental effect of FTY720 on Aβ production (Fig. 4A and B). In sharp contrast, extracellular addition of FTY720-P did not affect the Aβ production from N2a cells (Fig. 4C). These results raise the possibility that the molecular mechanism whereby FTY720 lowers Aβ production is independent of its antagonistic effects neither on S1PR1 nor Gi pathways and that intracellular FTY720-P lowers Aβ by an as yet identified mechanism.
Figure 4

The effect of FTY720 on Aβ production is independent of downstream signaling of S1P receptors.

(A) Levels of secreted Aβ from N2a cells co-treated with FTY720 and S1PR1 receptor antagonist W123 for 24 hrs (n = 4, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, N.S. no significant difference). (B) Levels of secreted Aβ from N2a cells co-treated with FTY720 and Gi protein inhibitor suramin for 24 hrs (n = 4, mean ± SEM; ***P<0.001, N.S. no significant difference). (C) Levels of secreted Aβ from N2a cells treated with FTY720-P for 24 hrs (n = 4, mean ± SEM). (D) In vivo effect of FTY720 on Aβ levels in AD model mice brain. Levels of soluble Aβ in the cerebral cortices of female A7 mice at 6 months of age after 6-days treatment with FTY720 (0.5 mg/kg/day, s.c.). Total brain human Aβ levels were measured by human-Aβ specific sandwich ELISA (n = 3–4, mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, ** p<0.01).

The effect of FTY720 on Aβ production is independent of downstream signaling of S1P receptors.

(A) Levels of secreted Aβ from N2a cells co-treated with FTY720 and S1PR1 receptor antagonist W123 for 24 hrs (n = 4, mean ± SEM; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, N.S. no significant difference). (B) Levels of secreted Aβ from N2a cells co-treated with FTY720 and Gi protein inhibitor suramin for 24 hrs (n = 4, mean ± SEM; ***P<0.001, N.S. no significant difference). (C) Levels of secreted Aβ from N2a cells treated with FTY720-P for 24 hrs (n = 4, mean ± SEM). (D) In vivo effect of FTY720 on Aβ levels in AD model mice brain. Levels of soluble Aβ in the cerebral cortices of female A7 mice at 6 months of age after 6-days treatment with FTY720 (0.5 mg/kg/day, s.c.). Total brain human Aβ levels were measured by human-Aβ specific sandwich ELISA (n = 3–4, mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, ** p<0.01).

In vivo effects of FTY720 on Aβ levels in brains of AD model mice

FTY720 is known to cross the blood brain barrier and be accumulated in brains to suppress the inflammatory response in model mice of MS [19]. These data prompted us to test the in vivo effects of FTY720 in AD model mice. We subcutaneously injected FTY720 (0.5 mg/kg/day) for 6 days into 6-month-old female A7 transgenic mice overexpressing human APP carrying Swedish and Austrian double mutations [37]. At 6 months, A7 mice do not show amyloid plaques, whereas the levels of soluble Aβ are moderately increased compared to those in younger animals. Unexpectedly, we found that the level of soluble Aβ40 was decreased, whereas that of Aβ42 was significantly increased by a 6-days treatment with FTY720. This suggests that FTY720 treatment impacts on brain Aβ levels in vivo, although with some difference to its cellular effects.

Discussion

In this study, we examined the effect of S1PR modulators, FTY720 and KRP203, on brain Aβ and showed these compounds decreased Aβ production in neuronal cells. S1PR modulators decreased Aβ production also from βCTF, an APP-derived direct substrate of γ-secretase, without affecting AICD production nor the cleavage of Notch, suggesting that these reagents inhibited the carboxypeptidase-like γ-secretase activity. Sphk2 activity was required for the FTY720-mediated decrease of Aβ production, whereas the signaling cascade downstream of S1PR was dispensable for the effects of the FTY720. FTY720 was active also in vivo and decreased the levels of Aβ40 but increased those of Aβ42 in brains of APP transgenic mice. These results shed light on the complex regulatory function of S1PR modulators on brain Aβ. Phosphorylation of FTY720 or KRP203 by SphK2 yields the active metabolite FTY720-P or KRP203-P, respectively, which acts as the ligand for S1PR1 [14], [15], [38]. It has been shown that phosphorylated S1PR modulators induce endocytosis of S1PR1 from the cell surface after binding to S1PR1, thereby causing the antagonistic effects [14], [15]. Our RNAi suppression and overexpression studies showed that the SphK2 level was correlated to the capacity of FTY720 to decrease Aβ production (Fig. 3), supporting the view that phosphorylated forms of S1PR modulators are the bona fide active species that lower Aβ production. However, neither an authentic S1PR1 receptor an agonist SEW2871 nor antagonist W123 altered the Aβ production (Fig. S3). Moreover, co-treatment with W123 [41] or suramin [42] failed to cancel the inhibitory effect of FTY720 (Fig. 4), raising the possibility that the unconventional GPCR cascade is involved in the modulation of Aβ production. Interestingly, it has been shown that β2 adrenergic receptor [43] and an orphan G-protein receptor GPR3, the latter exhibiting a significant homology to S1PRs [44], affect the γ-secretase activity through the β-arrestin pathway [45], [46], [47]. β-Arrestins redistributes the γ-secretase complex toward detergent-resistant membranes, thereby increasing the catalytic activity of the complex [45], [47]. This raises the possibility that S1PR modulators also alter the distribution of γ-secretase to regulate the APP-specific processing to generate Aβ. Another possibility would be that FTY720-P directly binds to γ-secretase or APP. FTY720 is known to accumulate within endosomes [48], in which mature γ-secretase and APP reside [10]. Interestingly, it has been shown that phosphatidylinositol 4,5-diphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), a representative phospholipid with a second messenger activity, directly binds to γ-secretase and inhibits its activity [49]. However, we observed extracellularly treated FTY720-P did not significantly alter the Aβ production. It would be important to note that controlled phosphorylation of S1PR modulators at appropriate intracellular locations is critical to their function [50]. Moreover, we are unable to rule out the possibility that other S1PRs or unknown receptor is involved in the FTY720-mediated γ-secretase inhibition. Further study is required to determine the precise intracellular site of phosphorylation, and distribution, of FTY720-P in specific membrane microdomains or organelles. The binding of FTY720-P to γ-secretase or APP should also be examined. In contrast to the in vitro results in cells, a 6-days treatment of FTY720 decreased Aβ40, but increased Aβ42 in the brains of APP transgenic mice in vivo (Fig. 4D). We used a similar dosage of FTY720 that had been adopted in autoimmune model mice, which is expected to yield submicromolar levels of FTY720 in brains [19]. Thus, the unexpected rise in Aβ42 levels caused by FTY720 in vivo in brains might have been due to other mechanisms that are distinct from the modulation of the γ-secretase activity in cultured cells. Another possibility is that FTY720 affected the Aβ42 levels by negatively regulating the inflammatory responses in the central nervous system. FTY720 has been reported to inhibit the egress of T cell into the spinal cord in autoinflammatory response [19], as well as into the ischemic lesions in brain ischemia [51]. Interestingly, FTY720 also inhibited the migration of human monocytes induced by Aβ42 [52]. It is tempting to speculate that the FTY720 might have impacted on the Aβ42 metabolism in vivo through altering the clearance of Aβ42 by microglial cells, overriding the inhibitory effects on neurons. As FTY720 has been approved for MS therapy in clinics, the regulatory mechanisms whereby S1PR modulators impact on Aβ42 metabolism, as well as on the inflammatory responses in AD brains, should further be characterized, in the light of therapeutics as well as adverse effects in humans. In sum, we identified a novel role of S1PR modulators on Aβ, which may open up a novel aspect in Aβ metabolism and lead to a novel therapeutic strategy for AD. AlamarBlue assay of N2aNH cells treated with S1PR modulators. After 24 hr treatment with S1PR modulators, N2aNH cells were incubated with cultured medium containing almarBlue (Invitrogen). Medium was collected to monitor fluorescence at 530–560/590 nm excitation/emission wavelengthes. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Effect of S1PR1 agonist and antagonist on ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Immunoblotting analysis of N2a cell lysates for ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Prior to stimulation with the indicated compounds, N2a cells were starved in serum free medium for 6 hr. Results of densitometric analysis of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (compared with control) are shown below the columns. (A) N2a cells were incubated for 10 min with the FTY720 (1 µM), FTY720-P (1 µM), SEW2871 (1 µM), and PKC activator PMA (Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-acetate; 1 µM), which in known as an activator of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. (B) N2a cells were preincubated with or without 1 µM W123 for 10 min. After addition of 1 µM SEW2871, cells were further incubated for 30 min and harvested for immunoblotting. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Dose dependent responses of S1PR1 agonist and antagonist on N2aNH cells. N2aNH cells were treated with SEW2871 or W123 for 24 hr at indicated doses. These reagents have no toxicity at 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 µM (A; alamarBlue assay), and failed to affect the Aβ40 production at indicated doses (B). (TIF) Click here for additional data file.
  52 in total

1.  A sensitive and quantitative assay for measuring cleavage of presenilin substrates.

Authors:  Helena Karlström; Anna Bergman; Urban Lendahl; Jan Näslund; Johan Lundkvist
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Fingolimod (FTY720): discovery and development of an oral drug to treat multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Volker Brinkmann; Andreas Billich; Thomas Baumruker; Peter Heining; Robert Schmouder; Gordon Francis; Shreeram Aradhye; Pascale Burtin
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  FTY720 modulates human oligodendrocyte progenitor process extension and survival.

Authors:  Veronique E Miron; Cha Gyun Jung; Hye Jung Kim; Timothy E Kennedy; Betty Soliven; Jack P Antel
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Phosphorylation by sphingosine kinase 2 is essential for in vivo potency of FTY720 analogues.

Authors:  Klemens Högenauer; Andreas Billich; Charles Pally; Markus Streiff; Trixie Wagner; Karl Welzenbach; Peter Nussbaumer
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Signal transduction by activated mNotch: importance of proteolytic processing and its regulation by the extracellular domain.

Authors:  R Kopan; E H Schroeter; H Weintraub; J S Nye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Essential requirement for sphingosine kinase 2 in a sphingolipid apoptosis pathway activated by FTY720 analogues.

Authors:  Anthony S Don; Carolina Martinez-Lamenca; William R Webb; Richard L Proia; Ed Roberts; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Sphingosine kinase type 2 is essential for lymphopenia induced by the immunomodulatory drug FTY720.

Authors:  Barbara Zemann; Bernd Kinzel; Matthias Müller; Roland Reuschel; Diana Mechtcheriakova; Nicole Urtz; Frédéric Bornancin; Thomas Baumruker; Andreas Billich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Neural expression of G protein-coupled receptors GPR3, GPR6, and GPR12 up-regulates cyclic AMP levels and promotes neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  Shigeru Tanaka; Ken Ishii; Kazue Kasai; Sung Ok Yoon; Yoshinaga Saeki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Phosphoinositides suppress gamma-secretase in both the detergent-soluble and -insoluble states.

Authors:  Satoko Osawa; Satoru Funamoto; Mika Nobuhara; Satoko Wada-Kakuda; Masafumi Shimojo; Sosuke Yagishita; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Abeta immunotherapy: intracerebral sequestration of Abeta by an anti-Abeta monoclonal antibody 266 with high affinity to soluble Abeta.

Authors:  Kaoru Yamada; Chiori Yabuki; Peter Seubert; Dale Schenk; Yukiko Hori; Sumio Ohtsuki; Tetsuya Terasaki; Tadafumi Hashimoto; Takeshi Iwatsubo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  34 in total

1.  Prominence of central sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1 in attenuating aβ-induced injury by fingolimod.

Authors:  Masoumeh Asle-Rousta; Zeynab Kolahdooz; Leila Dargahi; Abolhassan Ahmadiani; Sanaz Nasoohi
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 2.  Nuclear Lipids in the Nervous System: What they do in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Mercedes Garcia-Gil; Elisabetta Albi
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Crosstalk between sphingolipids and vitamin D3: potential role in the nervous system.

Authors:  Mercedes Garcia-Gil; Federica Pierucci; Ambra Vestri; Elisabetta Meacci
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Beneficial Effects of Fingolimod in Alzheimer's Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.

Authors:  Efthalia Angelopoulou; Christina Piperi
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 5.  Druggable Sphingolipid Pathways: Experimental Models and Clinical Opportunities.

Authors:  Victoria A Blaho
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Age-Related Transcriptional Deregulation of Genes Coding Synaptic Proteins in Alzheimer's Disease Murine Model: Potential Neuroprotective Effect of Fingolimod.

Authors:  Henryk Jęśko; Iga Wieczorek; Przemysław Leonard Wencel; Magdalena Gąssowska-Dobrowolska; Walter J Lukiw; Robert Piotr Strosznajder
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 7.  Role of sphingolipid metabolism in neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Manal Alaamery; Nour Albesher; Nora Aljawini; Moneera Alsuwailm; Salam Massadeh; Michael A Wheeler; Chun-Cheih Chao; Francisco J Quintana
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.546

8.  FTY720 attenuates excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Raffaela Cipriani; Juan Carlos Chara; Alfredo Rodríguez-Antigüedad; Carlos Matute
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 8.322

9.  Neurodegeneration in Autoimmune Optic Neuritis Is Associated with Altered APP Cleavage in Neurons and Up-Regulation of p53.

Authors:  Sabine Herold; Prateek Kumar; Sven P Wichert; Benedikt Kretzschmar; Mathias Bähr; Moritz J Rossner; Katharina Hein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sphingosine-1-phosphate and its effect on glucose deprivation/glucose reload stress: from gene expression to neuronal survival.

Authors:  Kinga Czubowicz; Magdalena Cieślik; Joanna Pyszko; Joanna B Strosznajder; Robert P Strosznajder
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.