BACKGROUND: Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is a target of the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolic acid (MPA). A 12-hour clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was conducted to compare IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 gene expression, IMPDHI and IMPDHII protein levels, and enzyme activity between kidney transplant recipients with respect to diabetes status. METHODS: Nondiabetic (ND, n = 11) and diabetic (D, n = 9) kidney transplant recipients and on nontransplant nondiabetic (n = 10) and diabetic (n = 10) volunteers were included in the study. RESULTS: Area under the effect curve values for gene expression: IMPDH1 [ND: 22.1 (13.8-31.3) versus D: 4.5 (2.3-6.5), P < 0.001] and IMPDH2 [ND: 15.3 (11.0-21.7) versus D: 6.1 (4.6-8.6), P < 0.001], protein level: IMPDHI [ND: 1.0 (0.5-1.3) versus 0.5 (0.4-0.7), P = 0.002] and IMPDHII [ND: 1.0 (0.6-1.6) versus D: 0.7 (0.6-0.8) P < 0.001] and enzyme activity [ND: 180 (105-245) versus D: 29.9 (15.3-35.6) µmole·s(-1)·mole(-1) adenosine monophosphate, P < 0.001] was significantly lower in transplant recipients with diabetes. Similar results were observed in nontransplanted volunteers. Kinetic studies of MPA-mediated suppression of IMPDH activity in nontransplanted individuals revealed an approximately 2.5-fold lower half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) for diabetic as compared with nondiabetic [ND: 50.2 (49.8-50.7) versus D: 15.8 (15.6-16.3) nmole/L, P = 0.004] volunteers. This difference was not related to several IMPDH gene variants. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a significantly lower IMPDH gene expression, protein level, and enzyme activity in diabetic patients. Further clinical studies in a larger number of patients are warranted to verify whether MPA dosing must be optimized for kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.
BACKGROUND:Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is a target of the immunosuppressive drug, mycophenolic acid (MPA). A 12-hour clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was conducted to compare IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 gene expression, IMPDHI and IMPDHII protein levels, and enzyme activity between kidney transplant recipients with respect to diabetes status. METHODS: Nondiabetic (ND, n = 11) and diabetic (D, n = 9) kidney transplant recipients and on nontransplant nondiabetic (n = 10) and diabetic (n = 10) volunteers were included in the study. RESULTS: Area under the effect curve values for gene expression: IMPDH1 [ND: 22.1 (13.8-31.3) versus D: 4.5 (2.3-6.5), P < 0.001] and IMPDH2 [ND: 15.3 (11.0-21.7) versus D: 6.1 (4.6-8.6), P < 0.001], protein level: IMPDHI [ND: 1.0 (0.5-1.3) versus 0.5 (0.4-0.7), P = 0.002] and IMPDHII [ND: 1.0 (0.6-1.6) versus D: 0.7 (0.6-0.8) P < 0.001] and enzyme activity [ND: 180 (105-245) versus D: 29.9 (15.3-35.6) µmole·s(-1)·mole(-1) adenosine monophosphate, P < 0.001] was significantly lower in transplant recipients with diabetes. Similar results were observed in nontransplanted volunteers. Kinetic studies of MPA-mediated suppression of IMPDH activity in nontransplanted individuals revealed an approximately 2.5-fold lower half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) for diabetic as compared with nondiabetic [ND: 50.2 (49.8-50.7) versus D: 15.8 (15.6-16.3) nmole/L, P = 0.004] volunteers. This difference was not related to several IMPDH gene variants. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a significantly lower IMPDH gene expression, protein level, and enzyme activity in diabeticpatients. Further clinical studies in a larger number of patients are warranted to verify whether MPA dosing must be optimized for kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.
Authors: P Glander; K P Braun; P Hambach; S Bauer; I Mai; I Roots; J Waiser; L Fritsche; H H Neumayer; K Budde Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: K Budde; K-P Braun; P Glander; T Böhler; P Hambach; L Fritsche; J Waiser; I Mai; H-H Neumayer Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Jonathan P Whitehead; Fiona Simpson; Michelle M Hill; Elaine C Thomas; Lisa M Connolly; Frank Collart; Richard J Simpson; David E James Journal: Traffic Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.215
Authors: Ying He; Zhousan Zheng; Yi Xu; Huiwen Weng; Ying Gao; Kai Qin; Jian Rong; Cui Chen; Miao Yun; Jiaxing Zhang; Sheng Ye Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: L Zhou; D Xia; J Zhu; Y Chen; G Chen; R Mo; Y Zeng; Q Dai; H He; Y Liang; F Jiang; W Zhong Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2014-03-22 Impact factor: 3.405