OBJECTIVE: To investigate if serum C-reactive protein (s-CRP) and interleukin 6 (s-IL6) provide information for predicting renal damage and for DMSA patient selection in children with urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: This observational study was carried out in children with UTI. s-CRP and s-IL6 were measured at UTI diagnosis. Patients forming renal scarring were identified by DMSA scans. The usefulness of s-CRP and s-IL6 measurements for nephropathy scarring diagnosis was evaluated using diagnostic quality and efficiency indexes. RESULTS: Thirty-two children were included in the study. Eight showed renal scarring after the follow-up. The s-CRP was 110.23 ± 59.69 mg/L and 52.46 ± 63.13 mg/L for patients with and without renal scarring. The s-IL6 concentration was 18.34 ± 11.80 pg/mL and 8.07 ± 9.51 pg/mL respectively. The cut-off points for optimum nephropathy scarring diagnosis were 115 mg/L for s-CRP and 20 pg/mL for s-IL6. The value of highest sensitivity for s-CRP was >5 mg/L (S:100 %) and greatest specificity was >150 mg/L (Sp:95.83). The highest sensitivity for s-IL6 was >4 pg/mL (S:100 %) and the maximum specificity was >40 pg/mL (Sp:100 %). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm that children who will develop renal scarring show higher levels of s-IL6 and s-CRP at UTI diagnosis. However, none of the techniques provide sufficient information for predicting renal damage in all patients and for DMSA patient selection.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if serum C-reactive protein (s-CRP) and interleukin 6 (s-IL6) provide information for predicting renal damage and for DMSApatient selection in children with urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: This observational study was carried out in children with UTI. s-CRP and s-IL6 were measured at UTI diagnosis. Patients forming renal scarring were identified by DMSA scans. The usefulness of s-CRP and s-IL6 measurements for nephropathy scarring diagnosis was evaluated using diagnostic quality and efficiency indexes. RESULTS: Thirty-two children were included in the study. Eight showed renal scarring after the follow-up. The s-CRP was 110.23 ± 59.69 mg/L and 52.46 ± 63.13 mg/L for patients with and without renal scarring. The s-IL6 concentration was 18.34 ± 11.80 pg/mL and 8.07 ± 9.51 pg/mL respectively. The cut-off points for optimum nephropathy scarring diagnosis were 115 mg/L for s-CRP and 20 pg/mL for s-IL6. The value of highest sensitivity for s-CRP was >5 mg/L (S:100 %) and greatest specificity was >150 mg/L (Sp:95.83). The highest sensitivity for s-IL6 was >4 pg/mL (S:100 %) and the maximum specificity was >40 pg/mL (Sp:100 %). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm that children who will develop renal scarring show higher levels of s-IL6 and s-CRP at UTI diagnosis. However, none of the techniques provide sufficient information for predicting renal damage in all patients and for DMSApatient selection.
Authors: Silvia Bressan; Barbara Andreola; Pietro Zucchetta; Giovanni Montini; Marta Burei; Giorgio Perilongo; Liviana Da Dalt Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Luis Miguel Rodríguez; Belén Robles; José Manuel Marugán; Angeles Suárez; Fernando Santos Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 3.714