Literature DB >> 23666440

Clinical course outcomes for store and forward teledermatology versus conventional consultation: a randomized trial.

John D Whited1, Erin M Warshaw, Kush Kapur, Karen E Edison, Lizy Thottapurathu, Srihari Raju, Bethany Cook, Holly Engasser, Samantha Pullen, Thomas E Moritz, Santanu K Datta, Lucinda Marty, Neal A Foman, Pitiporn Suwattee, Dana S Ward, Domenic J Reda.   

Abstract

We assessed the clinical course of patients after store and forward teledermatology in comparison with conventional consultations. Patients being referred from primary care to dermatology clinics were randomly assigned to teledermatology or a conventional consultation. A total of 392 patients were randomized; 261 patients completed the study and were included in the analysis. Their clinical course was rated on a five-point scale by a panel of three dermatologists, blinded to study assignment, who reviewed serial digital image sets. The clinical course was assessed by comparing images sets between baseline and first clinic visit (if one occurred) and between baseline and nine months. There was no evidence to suggest a difference between the two groups in either clinical course between baseline and nine months post-referral (P = 0.88) or between baseline and the first dermatology clinic visit (P = 0.65). Among teledermatology referrals, subsequent presentation for an in-person dermatology clinic visit was significantly correlated with clinical course (P = 0.023). Store and forward teledermatology did not result in a significant difference in clinical course at either of two post-referral time periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23666440     DOI: 10.1177/1357633x13487116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Pediatric Teledermatology Using Parent-Submitted Photographs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Daniel M O'Connor; Olivia S Jew; Marissa J Perman; Leslie A Castelo-Soccio; Flaura K Winston; Patrick J McMahon
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 2.  The Empirical Foundations of Teledermatology: A Review of the Research Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Trilokraj Tejasvi; Joseph C Kvedar; Michael Gates
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Using Network Oriented Research Assistant (NORA) Technology to Compare Digital Photographic With In-Person Assessment of Acne Vulgaris.

Authors:  Hannah M Singer; Timothy Almazan; Noah Craft; Consuelo V David; Samantha Eells; Crisel Erfe; Cynthia Lazzaro; Kathy Nguyen; Katy Preciado; Belinda Tan; Vishal A Patel
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care.

Authors:  Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Ana Rita J Maria; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Gemma Villanueva; Marita S Fønhus; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Nicholas Henschke; Brian S Buckley; Garrett L Mehl; Tigest Tamrat; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18

5.  Store-and-forward teledermatology: a case report.

Authors:  Matthew A Lenardis; Robert S Solomon; Fok-Han E Leung
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-09-01

6.  Improving cooperation between general practitioners and dermatologists via telemedicine: study protocol of the cluster-randomized controlled TeleDerm study.

Authors:  Roland Koch; Andreas Polanc; Hannah Haumann; Gudula Kirtschig; Peter Martus; Christian Thies; Leonie Sundmacher; Carmen Gaa; Leonard Witkamp; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.