BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few data are available to support the clinical relevance of infliximab (IFX) trough levels for prediction of endoscopic disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD). This study evaluated the endoscopic disease activities in relation to clinical outcome using several laboratory markers including serum IFX trough levels in patients with CD undergoing scheduled IFX maintenance treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 78 sessions of endoscopy were performed on 45 patients with CD. Endoscopic activity was assessed using the modified Rutgeerts scoring system. IFX trough levels and anti-IFX antibodies (ATIs) were determined by immunoassays. RESULTS: Endoscopic activity negatively correlated with serum IFX trough levels (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) = -0.54, P < 0.0001) and serum albumin levels (ρ = -0.46, P < 0.0001), and positively correlated with CRP (C-reactive protein) levels (ρ = 0.55, P < 0.0001), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) (ρ = 0.47, P < 0.0001) and fecal calprotectin levels. IFX trough levels and serum albumin levels were significantly elevated in the mucosal healing (MH) group, but ATIs, CRP, ESR and fecal calprotectin levels were significantly elevated in the nonmucosal healing group. Receiver operation curve revealed that the optimal cutoff value of IFX trough levels for identifying normal laboratory markers was 0.6 μg/ml for CRP, 1.0 μg/ml for serum albumin and 1.1 μg/ml for fecal calprotectin. Identification of mucosal healing needed a higher cutoff value of 4.0 μg/ml. Thiopurine treatment did not affect IFX trough and ATI levels. CONCLUSION: Mucosal healing requires higher IFX trough levels, compared to those to achieve normalization of routine clinical markers.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few data are available to support the clinical relevance of infliximab (IFX) trough levels for prediction of endoscopic disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD). This study evaluated the endoscopic disease activities in relation to clinical outcome using several laboratory markers including serum IFX trough levels in patients with CD undergoing scheduled IFX maintenance treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 78 sessions of endoscopy were performed on 45 patients with CD. Endoscopic activity was assessed using the modified Rutgeerts scoring system. IFX trough levels and anti-IFX antibodies (ATIs) were determined by immunoassays. RESULTS: Endoscopic activity negatively correlated with serum IFX trough levels (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) = -0.54, P < 0.0001) and serum albumin levels (ρ = -0.46, P < 0.0001), and positively correlated with CRP (C-reactive protein) levels (ρ = 0.55, P < 0.0001), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) (ρ = 0.47, P < 0.0001) and fecal calprotectin levels. IFX trough levels and serum albumin levels were significantly elevated in the mucosal healing (MH) group, but ATIs, CRP, ESR and fecal calprotectin levels were significantly elevated in the nonmucosal healing group. Receiver operation curve revealed that the optimal cutoff value of IFX trough levels for identifying normal laboratory markers was 0.6 μg/ml for CRP, 1.0 μg/ml for serum albumin and 1.1 μg/ml for fecal calprotectin. Identification of mucosal healing needed a higher cutoff value of 4.0 μg/ml. Thiopurine treatment did not affect IFX trough and ATI levels. CONCLUSION: Mucosal healing requires higher IFX trough levels, compared to those to achieve normalization of routine clinical markers.
Authors: Severine Vermeire; Maja Noman; Gert Van Assche; Filip Baert; Geert D'Haens; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Gut Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jean-Frédéric Colombel; William J Sandborn; Paul Rutgeerts; Robert Enns; Stephen B Hanauer; Remo Panaccione; Stefan Schreiber; Dan Byczkowski; Ju Li; Jeffrey D Kent; Paul F Pollack Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-11-29 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Allez; S Vermeire; N Mozziconacci; P Michetti; D Laharie; E Louis; M-A Bigard; X Hébuterne; X Treton; A Kohn; P Marteau; A Cortot; C Nichita; G van Assche; P Rutgeerts; M Lémann; J-F Colombel Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Fabian Schnitzler; Herma Fidder; Marc Ferrante; Maja Noman; Ingrid Arijs; Gert Van Assche; Ilse Hoffman; Kristel Van Steen; Séverine Vermeire; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz; Gil Y Melmed; Peter M Irving; Niels Vande Casteele; Patricia L Kozuch; Laura E Raffals; Leonard Baidoo; Brian Bressler; Shane M Devlin; Jennifer Jones; Gilaad G Kaplan; Miles P Sparrow; Fernando S Velayos; Thomas Ullman; Corey A Siegel Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: María Chaparro; Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta; Ana Echarri; Rosendo Almendros; Jesús Barrio; Jordina Llao; Fernando Gomollón; Maribel Vera; José Luis Cabriada; Jordi Guardiola; Iván Guerra; Belén Beltrán; Oscar Roncero; David Busquets; Carlos Taxonera; Xavier Calvet; Rocío Ferreiro-Iglesias; Virginia Ollero Pena; David Bernardo; María G Donday; Ana Garre; Ana Godino; Ana Díaz; Javier P Gisbert Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Ilana Reinhold; Sena Blümel; Jens Schreiner; Onur Boyman; Jan Bögeholz; Marcus Cheetham; Gerhard Rogler; Luc Biedermann; Michael Scharl Journal: Inflamm Intest Dis Date: 2020-11-20